Paraesophageal hernia: the state of the problem and controversial issues. Review

T. Tarasov, L. Markulan
{"title":"Paraesophageal hernia: the state of the problem and controversial issues. Review","authors":"T. Tarasov, L. Markulan","doi":"10.30978/gs-2022-2-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature review focuses on the controversial issues regarding the treatment of paraesophageal hernia. The limitations of the current classification of hiatal hernias are highlighted. It is irrelevant and does not meet clinical needs. Objective criteria for its improvement are proposed. Data on the prevalence and course of hiatal hernias are given. Their pathogenetic factors and diagnostic methods are underlined. Considerable emphasis is placed on the paraesophageal hernia treatment strategies in patients with an asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic clinical course of the disease. Arguments are presented in favour of both wait‑and‑see tactics and planned hernioplasty. The choice of hernioplasty technique, especially in the case of giant hernias, the feasibility and indications for the use of mesh implants depending on their shape and composition, and the potential complications of allogenioplasty are the main topics for discussion. The problem of selecting a fundoplication method is addressed while weighing the advantages and potential side effects of employing various fundoplication modifications. The effects of correcting a short esophagus and eliminating the axial pressure on the esophageal hiatus are thoroughly evaluated, as these conditions increase the risk of hernia recurrence. \nThe authors concluded that there are many controversial issues in the treatment of paraesophageal hernia. A consensus is needed on the classification of paraesophageal hernias, which would meet the urgent needs of choosing the method of operative delivery, and, in particular, the definition of the concepts of «large hernia» and «giant hernia.» Further research is required on issues such as the indications for operative treatment of paraesophageal hernias, especially in the case of asymptomatic large hernias and incarcerated hernias; the feasibility of using implants for plastic surgery of the esophageal hiatus; the choice of a fundoplication method; the diagnosis and correction of a short esophagus; and methodology for evaluating long‑term treatment outcomes. \n ","PeriodicalId":12661,"journal":{"name":"General Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30978/gs-2022-2-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature review focuses on the controversial issues regarding the treatment of paraesophageal hernia. The limitations of the current classification of hiatal hernias are highlighted. It is irrelevant and does not meet clinical needs. Objective criteria for its improvement are proposed. Data on the prevalence and course of hiatal hernias are given. Their pathogenetic factors and diagnostic methods are underlined. Considerable emphasis is placed on the paraesophageal hernia treatment strategies in patients with an asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic clinical course of the disease. Arguments are presented in favour of both wait‑and‑see tactics and planned hernioplasty. The choice of hernioplasty technique, especially in the case of giant hernias, the feasibility and indications for the use of mesh implants depending on their shape and composition, and the potential complications of allogenioplasty are the main topics for discussion. The problem of selecting a fundoplication method is addressed while weighing the advantages and potential side effects of employing various fundoplication modifications. The effects of correcting a short esophagus and eliminating the axial pressure on the esophageal hiatus are thoroughly evaluated, as these conditions increase the risk of hernia recurrence. The authors concluded that there are many controversial issues in the treatment of paraesophageal hernia. A consensus is needed on the classification of paraesophageal hernias, which would meet the urgent needs of choosing the method of operative delivery, and, in particular, the definition of the concepts of «large hernia» and «giant hernia.» Further research is required on issues such as the indications for operative treatment of paraesophageal hernias, especially in the case of asymptomatic large hernias and incarcerated hernias; the feasibility of using implants for plastic surgery of the esophageal hiatus; the choice of a fundoplication method; the diagnosis and correction of a short esophagus; and methodology for evaluating long‑term treatment outcomes.  
食管癌旁疝的现状及争议问题。审查
本文就食道旁疝治疗中存在争议的问题进行综述。强调了目前裂孔疝分类的局限性。这是不相关的,不符合临床需要。提出了改进的客观标准。资料的流行和裂孔疝的过程给出。重点介绍了其发病因素和诊断方法。相当多的重点放在食管旁疝患者的治疗策略与无症状和轻度症状的临床病程的疾病。提出了支持观望策略和计划疝成形术的论点。疝成形术的选择,特别是在巨大疝的情况下,根据其形状和成分使用网状植入物的可行性和适应症,以及同种异体成形术的潜在并发症是讨论的主要主题。在权衡采用各种复底修改的优点和潜在副作用的同时,解决了选择复底方法的问题。矫正食管短段和消除食管裂孔轴向压力的效果被彻底评估,因为这些情况会增加疝复发的风险。作者认为,在食管旁疝的治疗中存在许多有争议的问题。食管旁疝的分类需要有一个共识,以满足手术方式选择的迫切需要,特别是“大疝”和“巨疝”概念的定义。»食管旁疝,特别是无症状大疝和嵌顿疝的手术治疗指征等问题有待进一步研究;种植体用于食管裂孔整形手术的可行性基础复制方法的选择;食管短的诊断与矫正评估长期治疗结果的方法学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信