There Was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra

S. Oyewole
{"title":"There Was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra","authors":"S. Oyewole","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review of There Was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra by Chinua Achebe (London: Penguin Book, 2012. 352 pp., ISBN: 978-0143124030) by Samuel Oyewole (Samueloyewole47@yahoo.co.uk), Instructor, Department of Political Science; University of Ilorin, Ilorin, NigeriaThe Nigerian Civil War remains one of the most important political incidents in the history of the country. The Civil War covers the period of 30 months (1967-1970) of confrontation between the secessionist eastern region, Republic of Biafra and the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The significant of this event for Nigerian political development cannot be overemphasised. Forty-four years after the war, its legacies have endured against the stability of the nation. Among the legacies of the Civil War and notable reasons for the book are: 1) despite the policy of reintegration pursued by the post-civil war governments, the Igbos (members of the ethnic group that dominated the secession) still continued to feel less secure outside their 'state of origin', and most particularly in the northern region; 2) the Igbo people have remained politically marginalised in the national politics; and 3) Biafra and neo-Biafra ideas have continued to serve as popular points of rally and advocacy. The relevance of violent advocacy groups like Movement for Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) is an instance.Appreciable number of books has appeared on the subject of Nigerian Civil War. Some of the existing accounts have engaged the Civil War broadly, while others focused on aspects of the event, including antecedents of the war, battle experiences, the cost, international dimension, the consequences et-central. It is within the context of antecedents of the war and overall cost incurred by the Igbo nation before and during the war that one could find this book worthwhile. The book contribute to knowledge on civil war, ethno-regional politics, insurgency and terrorism, state viability, regime security, leadership crisis, art, education and diplomacy. The book benefited from the reputation of the author in the world of literature, in terms of attention. This account explains the Biafra secessionist struggle within the framework of leadership crisis in Nigeria. This factor is identified to have interplay the phenomenon of ethnicity, democratic reversal and state failure in Nigerian history. The book explains the trend that accounted for the personality clash between General Yakubu Gowon, the military head of state of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the military governor of the eastern region and the head of (defunct) Biafran state, Lt-Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu. This personality clash plays out well within the framework of ethnic, regional and even religious cleavages. To this understanding, the civil war was identified as ethno-regional struggle within the country, but Ojukwu was successful with propaganda in depicting it as religious war for the Western world.With the account of massacre that preceded the civil war, the author draws readers' attention to the precedence in patterns of modern terrorism in Nigeria. The book captures the dehumanising crusade against the Igbos outside the eastern region before the war. This is identified as a sufficient, logical and moral reason for men to rebel. Therefore, the moral premises of the secessionist war against the Nigerian federation were acknowledged. Despite this, the author went further to identify efforts made by the Igbos to prevent the rapid deterioration of the situation that caused the civil war. In this way, the commitment of the Igbos to the unity of Nigeria was appraised. …","PeriodicalId":92304,"journal":{"name":"The journal of Pan African studies","volume":"79 1","pages":"312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"149","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of Pan African studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 149

Abstract

A review of There Was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra by Chinua Achebe (London: Penguin Book, 2012. 352 pp., ISBN: 978-0143124030) by Samuel Oyewole (Samueloyewole47@yahoo.co.uk), Instructor, Department of Political Science; University of Ilorin, Ilorin, NigeriaThe Nigerian Civil War remains one of the most important political incidents in the history of the country. The Civil War covers the period of 30 months (1967-1970) of confrontation between the secessionist eastern region, Republic of Biafra and the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The significant of this event for Nigerian political development cannot be overemphasised. Forty-four years after the war, its legacies have endured against the stability of the nation. Among the legacies of the Civil War and notable reasons for the book are: 1) despite the policy of reintegration pursued by the post-civil war governments, the Igbos (members of the ethnic group that dominated the secession) still continued to feel less secure outside their 'state of origin', and most particularly in the northern region; 2) the Igbo people have remained politically marginalised in the national politics; and 3) Biafra and neo-Biafra ideas have continued to serve as popular points of rally and advocacy. The relevance of violent advocacy groups like Movement for Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) is an instance.Appreciable number of books has appeared on the subject of Nigerian Civil War. Some of the existing accounts have engaged the Civil War broadly, while others focused on aspects of the event, including antecedents of the war, battle experiences, the cost, international dimension, the consequences et-central. It is within the context of antecedents of the war and overall cost incurred by the Igbo nation before and during the war that one could find this book worthwhile. The book contribute to knowledge on civil war, ethno-regional politics, insurgency and terrorism, state viability, regime security, leadership crisis, art, education and diplomacy. The book benefited from the reputation of the author in the world of literature, in terms of attention. This account explains the Biafra secessionist struggle within the framework of leadership crisis in Nigeria. This factor is identified to have interplay the phenomenon of ethnicity, democratic reversal and state failure in Nigerian history. The book explains the trend that accounted for the personality clash between General Yakubu Gowon, the military head of state of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the military governor of the eastern region and the head of (defunct) Biafran state, Lt-Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu. This personality clash plays out well within the framework of ethnic, regional and even religious cleavages. To this understanding, the civil war was identified as ethno-regional struggle within the country, but Ojukwu was successful with propaganda in depicting it as religious war for the Western world.With the account of massacre that preceded the civil war, the author draws readers' attention to the precedence in patterns of modern terrorism in Nigeria. The book captures the dehumanising crusade against the Igbos outside the eastern region before the war. This is identified as a sufficient, logical and moral reason for men to rebel. Therefore, the moral premises of the secessionist war against the Nigerian federation were acknowledged. Despite this, the author went further to identify efforts made by the Igbos to prevent the rapid deterioration of the situation that caused the civil war. In this way, the commitment of the Igbos to the unity of Nigeria was appraised. …
《曾经有一个国家:比夫拉的个人历史
奇努阿·阿切贝的《有一个国家:比夫拉的个人历史》书评(伦敦:企鹅出版社,2012年)。352页,ISBN: 978-0143124030)由塞缪尔Oyewole (Samueloyewole47@yahoo.co.uk),讲师,政治科学系;伊洛林大学,伊洛林,尼日利亚尼日利亚内战仍然是该国历史上最重要的政治事件之一。内战包括分离主义东部地区、比夫拉共和国和尼日利亚联邦共和国之间长达30个月(1967-1970年)的对抗。这一事件对尼日利亚政治发展的重要性怎么强调都不为过。战争结束44年后,其遗留问题与国家的稳定背道而驰。内战的遗产和这本书值得注意的原因是:1)尽管内战后政府推行了重新融合的政策,但伊博人(主导分离的种族群体的成员)在他们的“原籍国”之外仍然感到不太安全,尤其是在北部地区;2)伊博人在国家政治中仍然处于政治边缘;3) Biafra和新Biafra思想继续作为集会和宣传的流行点。比亚夫拉主权国家实现运动(MASSOB)等暴力倡导团体的相关性就是一个例子。相当数量的书已经出现在尼日利亚内战的主题。一些现存的叙述广泛地涉及了内战,而另一些则侧重于事件的各个方面,包括战争的前奏、战斗经历、成本、国际层面、后果等。在战争的背景和伊博民族在战争前和战争期间所付出的总体代价的背景下,人们可以发现这本书是值得的。这本书有助于了解内战,民族地区政治,叛乱和恐怖主义,国家生存能力,政权安全,领导危机,艺术,教育和外交。这本书受益于作者在文学界的声誉,在关注方面。这一描述解释了尼日利亚领导危机框架内比夫拉分离主义斗争。这一因素被认为与尼日利亚历史上的种族、民主逆转和国家失败现象相互作用。这本书解释了尼日利亚联邦共和国军事元首雅库布·戈万将军与东部地区军事总督和比夫拉州(现已解散)州长中校之间人格冲突的趋势。Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu。这种个性冲突在种族、地区甚至宗教分裂的框架下表现得很好。根据这种理解,内战被确定为国家内部的民族-地区斗争,但Ojukwu成功地将其描述为西方世界的宗教战争。通过对内战前的大屠杀的描述,作者提请读者注意尼日利亚现代恐怖主义模式的先例。这本书捕捉到了战前对东部地区以外的伊博人进行的不人道的十字军东征。这被认为是男人反抗的充分的、合乎逻辑的和合乎道德的理由。因此,反对尼日利亚联邦的分离主义战争的道德前提得到了承认。尽管如此,发件人进一步指出伊博人为防止局势迅速恶化而造成内战所作的努力。这样,伊博人对尼日利亚统一的承诺得到了评价。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信