PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP JUDI ONLINE DI POLDA SUMATERA UTARA KAITANNYA DENGAN KEABSAHAN PEMBUKTIAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK

Taryono Raharja, Madiasa Ablisar, Mahmud Mulyadi, S. Sunarmi
{"title":"PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP JUDI ONLINE DI POLDA SUMATERA UTARA KAITANNYA DENGAN KEABSAHAN PEMBUKTIAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK","authors":"Taryono Raharja, Madiasa Ablisar, Mahmud Mulyadi, S. Sunarmi","doi":"10.46576/lj.v3i2.3100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSoccer betting and poker are electronic crimes, but in the process of snaring offenses they often stilluse the provisions of Article 303 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, instead of referring to theprovisions of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The policyposition of Law no. 11 of 2008 is a special position according to the principle of \"lex specialis derogatlex generalis\". The gap in Article 63 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code which still regulates theprovisions of special criminal rules is seen to overlap with the position of Article 27 of the ITE Lawwhich carries a penalty of six years in prison. So it is considered important to discuss the rules ofposition in the online gambling investigation procedure at the North Sumatra Regional Police. Thisresearch will examine and analyze 1) How is criminal law enforcement against online gamblingcrimes at the North Sumatra Regional Police; and 2) The validity of electronic evidence in provingonline gambling crime cases. The results of the research formulate where law enforcement againstonline gambling crimes prioritizes due process of law indicators; and regarding the validity ofelectronic evidence as digital evidence in uncovering criminal cases of online gambling, it must fullymeet the evidentiary requirements, so that it can be used at the investigative level.Keywords: Law enforcement; online gambling; North Sumatra Police","PeriodicalId":33353,"journal":{"name":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i2.3100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTSoccer betting and poker are electronic crimes, but in the process of snaring offenses they often stilluse the provisions of Article 303 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, instead of referring to theprovisions of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The policyposition of Law no. 11 of 2008 is a special position according to the principle of "lex specialis derogatlex generalis". The gap in Article 63 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code which still regulates theprovisions of special criminal rules is seen to overlap with the position of Article 27 of the ITE Lawwhich carries a penalty of six years in prison. So it is considered important to discuss the rules ofposition in the online gambling investigation procedure at the North Sumatra Regional Police. Thisresearch will examine and analyze 1) How is criminal law enforcement against online gamblingcrimes at the North Sumatra Regional Police; and 2) The validity of electronic evidence in provingonline gambling crime cases. The results of the research formulate where law enforcement againstonline gambling crimes prioritizes due process of law indicators; and regarding the validity ofelectronic evidence as digital evidence in uncovering criminal cases of online gambling, it must fullymeet the evidentiary requirements, so that it can be used at the investigative level.Keywords: Law enforcement; online gambling; North Sumatra Police
北苏门答腊地区对在线赌博的惩罚与电子证据证明的有效性有关
【摘要】足球博彩和扑克是电子犯罪,但在诱捕犯罪的过程中,他们仍然经常使用刑法第303条第(1)款的规定,而不是参考2008年第11号法关于信息和电子交易的规定。第1号法律的政策立场。根据“特别法”原则,2008年第11号是一个特殊的职位。《刑法》第63条第(1)款的空白仍然规定了特别刑事规则的规定,这被视为与《刑法》第27条的位置重叠,该条规定了6年监禁的处罚。因此,讨论北苏门答腊地区警察在网络赌博调查程序中的位置规则是很重要的。本研究将检查和分析1)北苏门答腊地区警察如何对网络赌博犯罪进行刑事执法;2)电子证据在网络赌博犯罪案件举证中的有效性。研究结果阐述了打击网络赌博犯罪执法在法律程序指标上的优先地位;而电子证据作为数字证据在破获网络赌博刑事案件中的有效性,必须完全符合证据要求,才能在侦查层面上使用。关键词:执法;在线赌博;北苏门答腊警方
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信