Evaluation of the Control of Water Sanitation and Hygiene Related Disease Through Community Hygiene Club Intervention in Rwanda

Amans Ntakarutimana, E. Nyandwi, N. Rujeni, C. Ingabire, K. Njunwa, Théoneste Ntakirutimana, G. Rwanyiziri, J. Tuyishimire, Schaddrack Ngabonziza
{"title":"Evaluation of the Control of Water Sanitation and Hygiene Related Disease Through Community Hygiene Club Intervention in Rwanda","authors":"Amans Ntakarutimana, E. Nyandwi, N. Rujeni, C. Ingabire, K. Njunwa, Théoneste Ntakirutimana, G. Rwanyiziri, J. Tuyishimire, Schaddrack Ngabonziza","doi":"10.5590/jsbhs.2022.16.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article consists of a review article reporting the results of previous evaluations of the control of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) related disease through the Community Hygiene Club (CHC) intervention from 2010 to 2020. CHC constitutes the main intervention for the control of WASH-related disease in Rwanda and is implemented countrywide. The study objective was to evaluate if the CHC intervention significantly reduced the prevalence of WASH-related disease after 10 years of its implementation in Rwanda. The study utilized online existing policy documents, research reports, and experiences on the CHC intervention in Rwanda published between 2010 and 2020. We selected and reviewed 12 published documents, and the evaluation followed the steps proposed by ACHI (2020) Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and related frameworks of effective implementation of community health interventions. The primary outcome measure used was the reduction of WASH-related disease while the secondary outcome measure used was the increase of household WASH practices at less than a 5% level of statistical significance. We also described the structure and the implementation process of the CHC intervention. From the case studies where frameworks of effective implementation of community health interventions were applied, the study results showed the intervention significantly (a) increased households’ WASH practices and (b) reduced WASH-related disease. Due to limited publications in the research area and the lack of association of the WASH-related diseases and practices to the CHC intervention’s evaluation for most of published research reports, we recommend additional field data for an extended conclusion and its generalization in Rwanda. The study highlights the need to use appropriate frameworks in the evaluation of community health interventions to (a) attribute the outcome to the intervention and (b) easily identify the shortcomings in case of failure to get expected outcomes.","PeriodicalId":89999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","volume":"44 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5590/jsbhs.2022.16.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article consists of a review article reporting the results of previous evaluations of the control of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) related disease through the Community Hygiene Club (CHC) intervention from 2010 to 2020. CHC constitutes the main intervention for the control of WASH-related disease in Rwanda and is implemented countrywide. The study objective was to evaluate if the CHC intervention significantly reduced the prevalence of WASH-related disease after 10 years of its implementation in Rwanda. The study utilized online existing policy documents, research reports, and experiences on the CHC intervention in Rwanda published between 2010 and 2020. We selected and reviewed 12 published documents, and the evaluation followed the steps proposed by ACHI (2020) Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and related frameworks of effective implementation of community health interventions. The primary outcome measure used was the reduction of WASH-related disease while the secondary outcome measure used was the increase of household WASH practices at less than a 5% level of statistical significance. We also described the structure and the implementation process of the CHC intervention. From the case studies where frameworks of effective implementation of community health interventions were applied, the study results showed the intervention significantly (a) increased households’ WASH practices and (b) reduced WASH-related disease. Due to limited publications in the research area and the lack of association of the WASH-related diseases and practices to the CHC intervention’s evaluation for most of published research reports, we recommend additional field data for an extended conclusion and its generalization in Rwanda. The study highlights the need to use appropriate frameworks in the evaluation of community health interventions to (a) attribute the outcome to the intervention and (b) easily identify the shortcomings in case of failure to get expected outcomes.
评价通过社区卫生俱乐部干预在卢旺达控制水卫生和卫生相关疾病
本文由一篇综述文章组成,报告了2010年至2020年通过社区卫生俱乐部(CHC)干预对水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)相关疾病控制的先前评估结果。卫生保健是卢旺达控制与wash有关疾病的主要干预措施,并在全国范围内实施。该研究的目的是评估CHC干预措施在卢旺达实施10年后是否显著降低了wash相关疾病的患病率。该研究利用了网上现有的政策文件、研究报告以及2010年至2020年间发表的关于卢旺达CHC干预的经验。我们选择并审查了12份已发表的文件,并按照ACHI(2020)健康影响评估(HIA)和有效实施社区卫生干预措施的相关框架提出的步骤进行评估。使用的主要结局指标是与WASH相关疾病的减少,而使用的次要结局指标是家庭WASH实践的增加,其统计显著性水平低于5%。我们还描述了CHC干预的结构和实施过程。从应用有效实施社区卫生干预措施框架的案例研究来看,研究结果表明,干预措施显著地(a)增加了家庭的讲卫生活动,(b)减少了与讲卫生有关的疾病。由于研究领域的出版物有限,并且大多数已发表的研究报告缺乏将wash相关疾病和实践与CHC干预措施的评估联系起来,我们建议增加实地数据,以扩大结论并在卢旺达推广。该研究强调,需要在评估社区卫生干预措施时使用适当的框架,以便(a)将结果归因于干预措施,(b)在未能取得预期结果的情况下,容易查明缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信