Does perpetrator gender influence attitudes towards intimate partner violence (IPV)? Examining the relationship between male-perpetrated and female-perpetrated IPV attitudes among a sample of UK young adults

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Ethan Conroy, D. Willmott, Anthony D. Murphy, B. K. Widanaralalage
{"title":"Does perpetrator gender influence attitudes towards intimate partner violence (IPV)? Examining the relationship between male-perpetrated and female-perpetrated IPV attitudes among a sample of UK young adults","authors":"Ethan Conroy, D. Willmott, Anthony D. Murphy, B. K. Widanaralalage","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-05-2023-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUnderstanding of the role that attitudes and beliefs may play on the judgments people make about intimate partner violence (IPV) is becoming increasingly important, notably in the context of the criminal justice process and in recognising IPV as a public health issue. This study aims to investigate the importance of several established factors predictive of attitudes towards male-perpetrated IPV, which have never previously been explored in relation to female-perpetrated IPV.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn total, 295 young adults (18–28) from across the UK completed an online survey (M Age = 23.82) comprised of four established psychometric inventories; the Rosenberg Self-esteem scale, Satisfaction with Life scale, Attitudes Towards Female Dating Violence scale and newly developed Modern Adolescent Dating Violence Attitudes (MADVA) scale, alongside a suite of associated demographic factors.\n\n\nFindings\nResults derived from a multiple linear regression indicates that three types of attitudes towards male-perpetrated violence against women (physical, sexual, and psychological abuse offline), were significant predictors of attitudes towards female-perpetrated IPV, along with gender and ethnicity. Self-esteem, satisfaction with life, age and education among those surveyed were not associated with attitudes towards female-perpetrated IPV.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results have important implications in developing educational programmes for those who have committed IPV offences, as well as teaching young people about the nature of partner abuse.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results suggest that those who endorse attitudes supportive of male-perpetrated IPV in offline environments, also endorse violence-supportive beliefs towards female-perpetrated IPV. In effect, violence-supportive attitudes are held irrespective of the sex of the perpetrator. However, this may differ in terms of how individuals view online types of abuse, where these attitudes appear to be processed differentially to offline attitudes.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-05-2023-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose Understanding of the role that attitudes and beliefs may play on the judgments people make about intimate partner violence (IPV) is becoming increasingly important, notably in the context of the criminal justice process and in recognising IPV as a public health issue. This study aims to investigate the importance of several established factors predictive of attitudes towards male-perpetrated IPV, which have never previously been explored in relation to female-perpetrated IPV. Design/methodology/approach In total, 295 young adults (18–28) from across the UK completed an online survey (M Age = 23.82) comprised of four established psychometric inventories; the Rosenberg Self-esteem scale, Satisfaction with Life scale, Attitudes Towards Female Dating Violence scale and newly developed Modern Adolescent Dating Violence Attitudes (MADVA) scale, alongside a suite of associated demographic factors. Findings Results derived from a multiple linear regression indicates that three types of attitudes towards male-perpetrated violence against women (physical, sexual, and psychological abuse offline), were significant predictors of attitudes towards female-perpetrated IPV, along with gender and ethnicity. Self-esteem, satisfaction with life, age and education among those surveyed were not associated with attitudes towards female-perpetrated IPV. Practical implications The results have important implications in developing educational programmes for those who have committed IPV offences, as well as teaching young people about the nature of partner abuse. Originality/value The results suggest that those who endorse attitudes supportive of male-perpetrated IPV in offline environments, also endorse violence-supportive beliefs towards female-perpetrated IPV. In effect, violence-supportive attitudes are held irrespective of the sex of the perpetrator. However, this may differ in terms of how individuals view online types of abuse, where these attitudes appear to be processed differentially to offline attitudes.
施暴者的性别是否影响对亲密伴侣暴力的态度?调查了英国年轻人中男性和女性的IPV态度之间的关系
目的了解态度和信仰可能对人们对亲密伴侣暴力行为的判断所起的作用正变得越来越重要,特别是在刑事司法程序和承认亲密伴侣暴力是一个公共卫生问题的背景下。这项研究的目的是调查对男性犯下的IPV态度的几个既定因素的重要性,这些因素以前从未在女性犯下的IPV中进行过探讨。设计/方法/方法来自英国各地的295名年轻人(18-28岁)完成了一项在线调查(M年龄= 23.82),包括四个既定的心理测量量表;Rosenberg自尊量表、生活满意度量表、女性约会暴力态度量表、新开发的现代青少年约会暴力态度量表(MADVA),以及一系列相关的人口统计学因素。多元线性回归的结果表明,对男性对女性实施暴力的三种态度(身体、性和心理虐待)以及性别和种族是对女性实施IPV态度的重要预测因素。在被调查者中,自尊、对生活的满意度、年龄和教育程度与对女性犯下的IPV的态度无关。实际意义研究结果对制定针对IPV罪犯的教育计划,以及教育年轻人关于伴侣虐待的本质具有重要意义。原创性/价值研究结果表明,那些支持在线下环境中男性实施IPV的态度的人,也支持对女性实施IPV的暴力支持信念。实际上,无论施暴者的性别如何,人们都持有支持暴力的态度。然而,这可能在个人如何看待在线类型的虐待方面有所不同,这些态度似乎与线下态度有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信