Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics; a controlled study of 1,007 cases.

J. Barnes, W. Pace, D. S. Trump, E. H. Ellison
{"title":"Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics; a controlled study of 1,007 cases.","authors":"J. Barnes, W. Pace, D. S. Trump, E. H. Ellison","doi":"10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in general surgery has long been debated. At the time this study was undertaken, sufficient evidence to condemn or justify such use of antibiotics had not been presented. In a complete review of the literature, several studies concerning this problem were found. McKittrick and, more recently, Sanchez-Ubeda published work suggesting that prophylactic postoperative antibiotics do not diminish the incidence of postoperative infections in general surgical patients. Appleton and Wisebrun in urology and Tachdjian and Compere in orthopedics reached similar conclusions. The present investigation studied the effect of routinely administered antibiotics on the postoperative course of general surgical patients. To assure the validity of the findings, it was necessary to meet two criteria. The first was that the number of patients be significantly large. The second was that the study be adequately controlled. Materials and Methods All major operative cases of the general surgical service","PeriodicalId":6876,"journal":{"name":"A.M.A. archives of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1959-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A.M.A. archives of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

The value of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in general surgery has long been debated. At the time this study was undertaken, sufficient evidence to condemn or justify such use of antibiotics had not been presented. In a complete review of the literature, several studies concerning this problem were found. McKittrick and, more recently, Sanchez-Ubeda published work suggesting that prophylactic postoperative antibiotics do not diminish the incidence of postoperative infections in general surgical patients. Appleton and Wisebrun in urology and Tachdjian and Compere in orthopedics reached similar conclusions. The present investigation studied the effect of routinely administered antibiotics on the postoperative course of general surgical patients. To assure the validity of the findings, it was necessary to meet two criteria. The first was that the number of patients be significantly large. The second was that the study be adequately controlled. Materials and Methods All major operative cases of the general surgical service
术后预防性抗生素;1007个病例的对照研究。
普外科术后预防性抗生素的应用价值一直存在争议。在进行这项研究时,并没有足够的证据来谴责或证明这种抗生素的使用是合理的。在完整的文献回顾中,发现了一些关于这个问题的研究。McKittrick和最近的Sanchez-Ubeda发表的研究表明,预防性术后抗生素并不能减少普通外科患者术后感染的发生率。泌尿外科的Appleton和Wisebrun以及矫形外科的Tachdjian和Compere得出了类似的结论。本研究旨在探讨常规抗生素对普通外科患者术后病程的影响。为了确保调查结果的有效性,必须满足两个标准。第一个是病人的数量非常大。第二是研究要有充分的控制。材料与方法普外科主要手术病例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信