Latin American Integration against the Backdrop of a Conservative Wave: Between Irrelevance and the Search for New Meanings

Q2 Arts and Humanities
V. Jeifets, Kseniya A. Konovalova
{"title":"Latin American Integration against the Backdrop of a Conservative Wave: Between Irrelevance and the Search for New Meanings","authors":"V. Jeifets, Kseniya A. Konovalova","doi":"10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-3-447-463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evolution of regionalism in Latin America has historically been greatly influenced by changes in governments and their ideological programs. In this article, looking at the courses of the administrations of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Ivan Duque in Colombia, Sebastian Piñera (second term, 2018-2022) in Chile, Mario Abdo Benítez in Paraguay, it is proposed to examine transformations in integration against the backdrop of increased influence of right-wing forces in regional alignments in the mid-2010s to the early 2020s. Analyzing foreign policy steps, rhetoric, content of conceptual documents, the authors focus on the peculiarities of the national views of various right forces on integration initiatives. The paper concentrates on the decline of Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), creation of Forum for the Progress and Integration of South America (PROSUR) and Lima Group, activities of the Pacific Alliance and Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) in the context of the demand for flexible and pragmatic integration “without politicization.” The authors come to several conclusions which show ambiguity of the right turn impact on the integration landscape in Latin America. First, although the rise of liberal-conservative forces has reformatted philosophy, key ideas of integration, participation in multilateral groups remains important for governments that seek to solve pressing problems and expand their own reputational and political capital with its help. Second, despite the fluidity of electoral dynamics, which may soon put an end to the dominance of the right, they have raised a number of issues of long-term relevance in the context of the future path of integration associations in the region. The contribution of the work is explained by its appeal to the very factor of ideology in the development of Latin American integration, detailed analysis of specific country experiences and new conclusions based on it.","PeriodicalId":55752,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","volume":"134 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-3-447-463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The evolution of regionalism in Latin America has historically been greatly influenced by changes in governments and their ideological programs. In this article, looking at the courses of the administrations of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Ivan Duque in Colombia, Sebastian Piñera (second term, 2018-2022) in Chile, Mario Abdo Benítez in Paraguay, it is proposed to examine transformations in integration against the backdrop of increased influence of right-wing forces in regional alignments in the mid-2010s to the early 2020s. Analyzing foreign policy steps, rhetoric, content of conceptual documents, the authors focus on the peculiarities of the national views of various right forces on integration initiatives. The paper concentrates on the decline of Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), creation of Forum for the Progress and Integration of South America (PROSUR) and Lima Group, activities of the Pacific Alliance and Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) in the context of the demand for flexible and pragmatic integration “without politicization.” The authors come to several conclusions which show ambiguity of the right turn impact on the integration landscape in Latin America. First, although the rise of liberal-conservative forces has reformatted philosophy, key ideas of integration, participation in multilateral groups remains important for governments that seek to solve pressing problems and expand their own reputational and political capital with its help. Second, despite the fluidity of electoral dynamics, which may soon put an end to the dominance of the right, they have raised a number of issues of long-term relevance in the context of the future path of integration associations in the region. The contribution of the work is explained by its appeal to the very factor of ideology in the development of Latin American integration, detailed analysis of specific country experiences and new conclusions based on it.
保守浪潮背景下的拉丁美洲一体化:在无关紧要和寻找新意义之间
拉美地区主义的演变在历史上很大程度上受到政府及其意识形态计划变化的影响。本文以巴西的雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)、哥伦比亚的伊万·杜克(Ivan Duque)、智利的塞巴斯蒂安Piñera(2018-2022年第二任期)、巴拉圭的马里奥·阿比多Benítez等人的执政历程为背景,提出在2010年代中期至2020年代初右翼势力在地区联盟中影响力增强的背景下,研究一体化的转型。作者分析了外交政策步骤、修辞、概念性文件的内容,重点分析了各种右翼势力对一体化倡议的民族观点的特殊性。本文集中讨论了南美国家联盟(UNASUR)和拉丁美洲和加勒比国家共同体(CELAC)的衰落,南美进步与一体化论坛(PROSUR)和利马集团的创建,太平洋联盟和南方共同市场(MERCOSUR)在“没有政治化”的灵活和务实一体化需求背景下的活动。作者得出了几个结论,表明右转对拉丁美洲一体化格局的影响是模糊的。首先,尽管自由-保守势力的崛起重塑了哲学、整合的关键理念,但参与多边组织对于寻求解决紧迫问题并在其帮助下扩大自身声誉和政治资本的政府来说仍然很重要。第二,尽管选举动态不稳定,可能很快就会结束右翼的主导地位,但它们在该地区一体化协会的未来道路方面提出了一些长期相关的问题。这项工作的贡献可以解释为它对拉丁美洲一体化发展中的意识形态因素的呼吁,对具体国家经验的详细分析以及在此基础上得出的新结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Vestnik RUDN International Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信