CONCEPTUAL REFERENCES REGARDING RECODIFICATION AND DECODIFICATION AS FORMS OF THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF LEGISLATION

Ion Postu, Elena Tentiuc
{"title":"CONCEPTUAL REFERENCES REGARDING RECODIFICATION AND DECODIFICATION AS FORMS OF THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF LEGISLATION","authors":"Ion Postu, Elena Tentiuc","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.1(243).10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the concepts of recodification and decodification, both from the perspective of legislative technique and systematization of legislation. Being seen as codification modalities or as reverse actions, these two phenomena are approached from the perspective of the activity of legislative creation. This study is the first of its kind, or being new concepts for Eastern European doctrine, decodification and recodification have not yet benefited from in-depth research in our legal literature, so in this article the authors analyze the considerations of Russian and European scientists, who have been the basis for promoting these new terms for local legal science. Practical examples of recodification and decodification include normative acts of the Republic of Moldova. The authors conclude that despite the difference in codification, decodification and recodification tasks, these legal phenomena are characterized by a certain degree of interconnection and ultimately provide their own definition of recodification, adjusted to the national regulatory framework.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.1(243).10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the concepts of recodification and decodification, both from the perspective of legislative technique and systematization of legislation. Being seen as codification modalities or as reverse actions, these two phenomena are approached from the perspective of the activity of legislative creation. This study is the first of its kind, or being new concepts for Eastern European doctrine, decodification and recodification have not yet benefited from in-depth research in our legal literature, so in this article the authors analyze the considerations of Russian and European scientists, who have been the basis for promoting these new terms for local legal science. Practical examples of recodification and decodification include normative acts of the Republic of Moldova. The authors conclude that despite the difference in codification, decodification and recodification tasks, these legal phenomena are characterized by a certain degree of interconnection and ultimately provide their own definition of recodification, adjusted to the national regulatory framework.
关于作为立法系统化形式的再认证和再认证的概念参考
本文从立法技术和立法体制性两个角度分析了再认证和再认证的概念。这两种现象既可以看作是法典化的形式,也可以看作是逆向的行为。“解码”和“再编码”作为东欧学说的新概念,在我国法学文献中尚未得到深入的研究,因此本文作者分析了俄罗斯和欧洲科学家的思考,他们是推动这些新术语进入地方法学的基础。重新编码和解码的实际例子包括摩尔多瓦共和国的规范性行为。作者的结论是,尽管编纂、解码和再编纂的任务不同,但这些法律现象具有一定程度的相互联系,并最终提供了自己的再编纂定义,以适应国家监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书