Speculation and exploitation: the Southern Rhodesian mining industry in the company era

Zambezia Pub Date : 2003-11-01 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V30I2.6771
I. Phimister
{"title":"Speculation and exploitation: the Southern Rhodesian mining industry in the company era","authors":"I. Phimister","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V30I2.6771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spekulasie en eksploitasie : die Suid-Rhodesiese Mynboubedryf in die Company -era In die geskiedskrywing oor mynbou in koloniale Zimbabwe word algemeen \nsaamgestem dat die bedryf op die uitbuiting van goedkoop swart arbeid geskoei was. \nEenstemmigheid geld ook in die historiografie wat betref die periodisering van die \ngeskiedenis. 'n Aanvanklike periode van spekulasie en bedrog is na die draai van die \ntwintigste eeu gevolg deur 'n fase waarin die bedryf se winsgewendheid deur 'n \nmeedoenlose beleid van kosteminimalisering verseker is. Terwyl sommige kundiges \ndaarop gewys het dat spekulasie en eksploitasie soms in dieselfde periode voorgekom \nhet, is die verband tussen die twee tot nog toe nie verken nie. In hierdie artikel word \naan die hand van 'n gevallestudie van een belangrike myn, geargumenteer dat \nspekulasie nie so seer eksploitasie vervang het as wat dit 'n intieme verhouding \ndaarmee ontwikkel het nie.\nThat mining in colonial Zimbabwe in general turned on the exploitation of cheap \nblack labour is well established in the subject's historiography. So too is its \nperiodisation. An initial period of speculation and fraud gave way after the turn of the \ntwentieth century to one in which the industry's profitability was secured largely \nthrough ruthless policies of cost minimisation. While some scholars however noted \nthat speculation and exploitation occasionally existed in the same period, the links \nbetween the two have never been explored. By means of a case study of one important \nmine, this article argues that speculation did not so much replace exploitation as \ndevelop an intimate relationship with it.","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"14 1","pages":"178-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V30I2.6771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Spekulasie en eksploitasie : die Suid-Rhodesiese Mynboubedryf in die Company -era In die geskiedskrywing oor mynbou in koloniale Zimbabwe word algemeen saamgestem dat die bedryf op die uitbuiting van goedkoop swart arbeid geskoei was. Eenstemmigheid geld ook in die historiografie wat betref die periodisering van die geskiedenis. 'n Aanvanklike periode van spekulasie en bedrog is na die draai van die twintigste eeu gevolg deur 'n fase waarin die bedryf se winsgewendheid deur 'n meedoenlose beleid van kosteminimalisering verseker is. Terwyl sommige kundiges daarop gewys het dat spekulasie en eksploitasie soms in dieselfde periode voorgekom het, is die verband tussen die twee tot nog toe nie verken nie. In hierdie artikel word aan die hand van 'n gevallestudie van een belangrike myn, geargumenteer dat spekulasie nie so seer eksploitasie vervang het as wat dit 'n intieme verhouding daarmee ontwikkel het nie. That mining in colonial Zimbabwe in general turned on the exploitation of cheap black labour is well established in the subject's historiography. So too is its periodisation. An initial period of speculation and fraud gave way after the turn of the twentieth century to one in which the industry's profitability was secured largely through ruthless policies of cost minimisation. While some scholars however noted that speculation and exploitation occasionally existed in the same period, the links between the two have never been explored. By means of a case study of one important mine, this article argues that speculation did not so much replace exploitation as develop an intimate relationship with it.
投机与开采:公司时代的南罗得西亚采矿业
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信