DNA DOUBLE-STRANDED BREAKS AND REPAIRS IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA

M. Bulegenova, A. Dunayeva, S. Saliyeva, A. Uskenbayeva
{"title":"DNA DOUBLE-STRANDED BREAKS AND REPAIRS IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA","authors":"M. Bulegenova, A. Dunayeva, S. Saliyeva, A. Uskenbayeva","doi":"10.52532/2521-6414-2023-2-68-22-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Double-strand Relevance: Errors in the damage repair system, such as double-stranded DNA breaks, can lead to mutations that will be passed on to subsequent generations of cells, and some of these mutations may have oncogenic potential. \nThe study aimed to evaluate the number of double-stranded breaks and DNA repairs of peripheral blood lymphocytes in a group of conditionally healthy children and in patients diagnosed with acute leukemia (AL) to develop a method for predicting the outcome of the disease and determining the effectiveness of therapy. \nMethods: peripheral blood lymphocytes were studied: a) 38 conditionally healthy children (control group); b) 100 patients diagnosed with acute leukemia (AL); c) 14 children with relapse of the disease. Double-stranded DNA breaks/repairs were examined using the Aklides system (MEDIPAN, Germany), consisting of a fluorescent analyzer and the AKLIDES Nuk software. \nResults: In patients with T-lymphoblastic leukemia, both at admission and the end of Day 7 at the hospital, the number of 53BPI repair foci was, on average, three times higher than the number of DNA damages. In most cases, the ratio of breaks/repairs indicators during treatment did not change among patients with B-line leukemia. Double-stranded DNA breaks prevailed over repairs, with the newly established disease on the 7th, 15th day, and 3rd month of treatment. \nOverall, 22 samples were tested using RT-PCR, and results were considered as follows:1 (4%) – positive, 13 (59%) – negative, 8 (37%) -– invalid. \nConclusion: The level of lymphocyte DNA damage in patients with B-ALL was higher than expected. In addition, the ratio of double-strand breaks to repairs remained unchanged at all stages of therapy in patients with B-ALL. The changes we suggest in these patients can be observed during and/or after maintenance therapy. Monitoring double-strand breaks/reparations was the initial step in developing a method of predicting the disease outcome and determining the therapy efficacy. The results obtained are of direct interest and require further research.","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2023-2-68-22-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance: Double-strand Relevance: Errors in the damage repair system, such as double-stranded DNA breaks, can lead to mutations that will be passed on to subsequent generations of cells, and some of these mutations may have oncogenic potential. The study aimed to evaluate the number of double-stranded breaks and DNA repairs of peripheral blood lymphocytes in a group of conditionally healthy children and in patients diagnosed with acute leukemia (AL) to develop a method for predicting the outcome of the disease and determining the effectiveness of therapy. Methods: peripheral blood lymphocytes were studied: a) 38 conditionally healthy children (control group); b) 100 patients diagnosed with acute leukemia (AL); c) 14 children with relapse of the disease. Double-stranded DNA breaks/repairs were examined using the Aklides system (MEDIPAN, Germany), consisting of a fluorescent analyzer and the AKLIDES Nuk software. Results: In patients with T-lymphoblastic leukemia, both at admission and the end of Day 7 at the hospital, the number of 53BPI repair foci was, on average, three times higher than the number of DNA damages. In most cases, the ratio of breaks/repairs indicators during treatment did not change among patients with B-line leukemia. Double-stranded DNA breaks prevailed over repairs, with the newly established disease on the 7th, 15th day, and 3rd month of treatment. Overall, 22 samples were tested using RT-PCR, and results were considered as follows:1 (4%) – positive, 13 (59%) – negative, 8 (37%) -– invalid. Conclusion: The level of lymphocyte DNA damage in patients with B-ALL was higher than expected. In addition, the ratio of double-strand breaks to repairs remained unchanged at all stages of therapy in patients with B-ALL. The changes we suggest in these patients can be observed during and/or after maintenance therapy. Monitoring double-strand breaks/reparations was the initial step in developing a method of predicting the disease outcome and determining the therapy efficacy. The results obtained are of direct interest and require further research.
急性白血病中DNA双链断裂和修复
相关性:损伤修复系统中的错误,如双链DNA断裂,可导致突变,这些突变将传递给后代的细胞,其中一些突变可能具有致癌潜力。该研究旨在评估一组条件健康儿童和诊断为急性白血病(AL)的患者外周血淋巴细胞双链断裂和DNA修复的数量,以开发一种预测疾病结局和确定治疗效果的方法。方法:外周血淋巴细胞研究:a)条件健康儿童38例(对照组);b)诊断为急性白血病(AL)患者100例;C)疾病复发的14名儿童。使用Aklides系统(MEDIPAN,德国)检测双链DNA断裂/修复,该系统由荧光分析仪和Aklides Nuk软件组成。结果:t淋巴细胞白血病患者入院时和入院第7天结束时,53BPI修复病灶的数量平均是DNA损伤数量的3倍。在大多数情况下,b系白血病患者在治疗期间的断裂/修复指标的比例没有改变。双链DNA断裂优于修复,在治疗的第7、15天和第3个月出现了新建立的疾病。总体而言,使用RT-PCR检测了22个样本,结果如下:1个(4%)阳性,13个(59%)阴性,8个(37%)无效。结论:B-ALL患者淋巴细胞DNA损伤水平高于预期。此外,在B-ALL患者的所有治疗阶段,双链断裂与修复的比例保持不变。我们建议这些患者的变化可以在维持治疗期间和/或之后观察到。监测双链断裂/修复是开发预测疾病结果和确定治疗效果方法的第一步。所得结果具有直接意义,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信