Randomized Phase II Trial of Either Fluorouracil, Parenteral Hydroxyurea, Interferon‐αt‐2a, and Filgrastim or Doxorubicin/Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer with Quality‐of‐Life Assessment: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E6296

S. Wadler, C. Brain, P. Catalano, A. Einzig, D. Cella, A. Benson
{"title":"Randomized Phase II Trial of Either Fluorouracil, Parenteral Hydroxyurea, Interferon‐αt‐2a, and Filgrastim or Doxorubicin/Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer with Quality‐of‐Life Assessment: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E6296","authors":"S. Wadler, C. Brain, P. Catalano, A. Einzig, D. Cella, A. Benson","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200205000-00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEThe Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase II trial to determine the objective response rates, toxicities, and overall survival and to assess effects on quality of life for two combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODSAll patients had biopsy-proven, untreated metastatic gastric cancer with measurable disease. The FHIG arm employed infusional fluorouracil (F), 2.6 g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once per week for 6 weeks; infusional hydroxyurea (H), 4.3g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once per week for 6 weeks; and interferon-a-2a (I), 9 MU given subcutaneously three times per week, once perweekfor6weeks. The AD arm employed doxorubicin (A), 50 mg/m2, and docetaxel (D), 75 mg/m2, both given intravenously every 21 days. Quality of life was measured by the FACT-Fatigue scale and a novel questionnaire assessing interferon-mediated fatigue. RESULTSTwenty-nine patients were enrolled; 23 were eligible and evaluable. Twelve were enrolled on FHIG and 11 on AD. The major grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neuromotor (46%) in patients receiving FHIG and granulocytopenia (91%) in those receiving AD. There were two fatalities in the AD arm. There was one partial responder on FHIG (8.3%) and none on AD. The median survival was 6.6 months for FHIG and 10.1 months for AD. Quality-of-life analysis did not show substantial cumulative fatigue in patients treated with FHIG. CONCLUSIONSNeither regimen demonstrated enough activity to serve as a platform for the development of further clinical regimens against gastric carcinoma. A subset of patients receiving interferon was able to tolerate therapy without deterioration in quality of life.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200205000-00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

PURPOSEThe Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase II trial to determine the objective response rates, toxicities, and overall survival and to assess effects on quality of life for two combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODSAll patients had biopsy-proven, untreated metastatic gastric cancer with measurable disease. The FHIG arm employed infusional fluorouracil (F), 2.6 g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once per week for 6 weeks; infusional hydroxyurea (H), 4.3g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once per week for 6 weeks; and interferon-a-2a (I), 9 MU given subcutaneously three times per week, once perweekfor6weeks. The AD arm employed doxorubicin (A), 50 mg/m2, and docetaxel (D), 75 mg/m2, both given intravenously every 21 days. Quality of life was measured by the FACT-Fatigue scale and a novel questionnaire assessing interferon-mediated fatigue. RESULTSTwenty-nine patients were enrolled; 23 were eligible and evaluable. Twelve were enrolled on FHIG and 11 on AD. The major grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neuromotor (46%) in patients receiving FHIG and granulocytopenia (91%) in those receiving AD. There were two fatalities in the AD arm. There was one partial responder on FHIG (8.3%) and none on AD. The median survival was 6.6 months for FHIG and 10.1 months for AD. Quality-of-life analysis did not show substantial cumulative fatigue in patients treated with FHIG. CONCLUSIONSNeither regimen demonstrated enough activity to serve as a platform for the development of further clinical regimens against gastric carcinoma. A subset of patients receiving interferon was able to tolerate therapy without deterioration in quality of life.
随机II期试验:氟尿嘧啶、肠外羟基脲、干扰素α - t - 2a和非格昔汀或阿霉素/多西紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌患者的生活质量评估:东部肿瘤合作组研究E6296
目的:东方肿瘤合作小组进行了一项随机II期试验,以确定两种联合方案对晚期胃癌患者的客观缓解率、毒性和总生存率,并评估其对生活质量的影响。患者和方法所有患者均为活检证实的未经治疗的转移性胃癌,伴有可测量的疾病。FHIG组采用输注氟尿嘧啶(F), 2.6 g/m2, 24小时静脉滴注,每周1次,连续6周;羟基脲(H) 4.3g/m2, 24小时静脉滴注,每周1次,连用6周;干扰素a-2a (I), 9 μ m,每周皮下注射3次,每周1次,连用6周。AD组采用阿霉素(A), 50mg /m2,多西紫杉醇(D), 75mg /m2,每21天静脉注射一次。生活质量通过fact -疲劳量表和一份新的干扰素介导的疲劳评估问卷来测量。结果入选患者29例;23个符合条件并可评估。FHIG组12例,AD组11例。≥3级的主要毒性是FHIG患者的神经运动(46%)和AD患者的粒细胞减少(91%)。AD部门有两人死亡。FHIG组有1例部分缓解(8.3%),AD组无。FHIG和AD的中位生存期分别为6.6个月和10.1个月。生活质量分析未显示FHIG治疗患者有明显的累积疲劳。结论:两种方案均未显示出足够的活性,可作为进一步开发抗胃癌临床方案的平台。一部分接受干扰素治疗的患者能够耐受治疗,而生活质量没有恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信