Influence of mean value of the modulus of elasticity in compression parallel to the grain on the design of timber trusses

IF 0.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
A. F. F. Gomes, Fernando Menezes de Almeida Filho, J. C. Molina, F. Mascarenhas, F. Lahr, A. Christoforo
{"title":"Influence of mean value of the modulus of elasticity in compression parallel to the grain on the design of timber trusses","authors":"A. F. F. Gomes, Fernando Menezes de Almeida Filho, J. C. Molina, F. Mascarenhas, F. Lahr, A. Christoforo","doi":"10.4025/actascitechnol.v45i1.58733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian standard ABNT NBR 7190 (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas [ABNT], 1997) recommends adopting the mean value of the modulus of elasticity to compression in the direction parallel to the grain (Ec0,m) in the calculation of displacements. The values of wood stiffness vary considerably, and they can generate displacements above the limit (L 200-1, where L is the span) established by the referred standard, which contributes to the appearance of pathologies in the structure. To evaluate the influence of the adoption of Ec0,m in the calculation of displacements, mechanical properties of wood species were obtained experimentally. With the aid of numerical models and experimental values, ten types of trusses were analyzed (Porch, Inclined Chord, Top Inclined Chord, Parallel Chord, Bowstring, Fink, Howe, K Truss, Pratt, Scissor), three spans (5, 10, and 20 m) and two species (Hymenolobium petraum Ducke e Hymenolobium sp). Initially, adopting Ec0,m for all members and performing a linear analysis, the maximum loads for the displacement L 200-1 were determined. Subsequently, experimental stiffness values were randomly assigned to each bar, and the maximum displacements were determined through nonlinear geometric analyses. Based on 1260 numerical simulations, deflections of approximately 17% (span of 5 m), 30% (span of 10 m), and 34% (span of 20 m) were observed to be higher than the result considering Ec0,m. This problem can be overcome by using non-destructive methods in the pre-classification of the structure bars, positioning the elements rationally in the regions of the highest demand.","PeriodicalId":7140,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum-technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum-technology","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v45i1.58733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brazilian standard ABNT NBR 7190 (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas [ABNT], 1997) recommends adopting the mean value of the modulus of elasticity to compression in the direction parallel to the grain (Ec0,m) in the calculation of displacements. The values of wood stiffness vary considerably, and they can generate displacements above the limit (L 200-1, where L is the span) established by the referred standard, which contributes to the appearance of pathologies in the structure. To evaluate the influence of the adoption of Ec0,m in the calculation of displacements, mechanical properties of wood species were obtained experimentally. With the aid of numerical models and experimental values, ten types of trusses were analyzed (Porch, Inclined Chord, Top Inclined Chord, Parallel Chord, Bowstring, Fink, Howe, K Truss, Pratt, Scissor), three spans (5, 10, and 20 m) and two species (Hymenolobium petraum Ducke e Hymenolobium sp). Initially, adopting Ec0,m for all members and performing a linear analysis, the maximum loads for the displacement L 200-1 were determined. Subsequently, experimental stiffness values were randomly assigned to each bar, and the maximum displacements were determined through nonlinear geometric analyses. Based on 1260 numerical simulations, deflections of approximately 17% (span of 5 m), 30% (span of 10 m), and 34% (span of 20 m) were observed to be higher than the result considering Ec0,m. This problem can be overcome by using non-destructive methods in the pre-classification of the structure bars, positioning the elements rationally in the regions of the highest demand.
平行纹路压缩弹性模量均值对木桁架设计的影响
巴西标准ABNT NBR 7190 (associa o Brasileira de Normas t cnicas [ABNT], 1997)建议在计算位移时采用平行于颗粒方向的压缩弹性模量的平均值(Ec0,m)。木材刚度的值变化很大,它们可以产生超过参考标准规定的极限(l200 -1,其中L是跨度)的位移,这有助于结构出现病态。为了评价采用Ec0、m对位移计算的影响,对不同树种木材的力学性能进行了实验研究。利用数值模型和实验值,对10种桁架类型(Porch、Inclined Chord、Top Inclined Chord、Parallel Chord、Bowstring、Fink、Howe、K Truss、Pratt、Scissor)、3种跨度(5、10和20 m)和2种(Hymenolobium petraum Ducke和Hymenolobium sp .)进行了分析。首先,对所有构件采用Ec0,m并进行线性分析,确定了位移l200 -1的最大载荷。随后,随机分配每个杆的试验刚度值,并通过非线性几何分析确定最大位移。基于1260次数值模拟,观测到挠度约为17%(跨度为5 m), 30%(跨度为10 m)和34%(跨度为20 m)高于考虑Ec0,m的结果。采用非破坏性的方法对结构杆进行预分类,将构件合理定位在需求最高的区域,可以克服这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum-technology
Acta Scientiarum-technology 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Technology, including: Engineerings, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Statistics, Geosciences and Computation Sciences. To establish the public inscription of knowledge and its preservation; To publish results of research comprising ideas and new scientific suggestions; To publicize worldwide information and knowledge produced by the scientific community; To speech the process of scientific communication in Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信