Firefighters’ knowledge of the knowledge of procedures for clearing the respiratory tract in an injured person with suspected infection with biological material (SARS-CoV-2) — a nationwide cross- -sectional study

Łukasz Dudziński, Piotr Konrad Leszczyński, Marcin Glinka, Marek Marzec, Michał Langner, Mariusz Feltynowski, M. Panczyk, P. Glinka
{"title":"Firefighters’ knowledge of the knowledge of procedures for clearing the respiratory tract in an injured person with suspected infection with biological material (SARS-CoV-2) — a nationwide cross- -sectional study","authors":"Łukasz Dudziński, Piotr Konrad Leszczyński, Marcin Glinka, Marek Marzec, Michał Langner, Mariusz Feltynowski, M. Panczyk, P. Glinka","doi":"10.5603/mrj.a2022.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of the procedure for clearing the respiratory tract and updated qualified first aid (QFA) 1a and 2a procedures by firefighters serving in State Fire Service (SFS) rescue and firefighting units, and their knowledge of the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Material and methods: The cross-sectional study covered 19 408 firefighters (officers serving in SFS rescue and firefighting units from all over Poland). The study was conducted using the diagnostic survey method, the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique consisting of a set of particulars regarding a specific officer and the appropriate medical part of the survey. Results: In the group of 19,408 respondents, 99.31% were men (n = 19,275), while women accounted for 0.69% (n = 133; p < 0.001). The age of the respondents was in the range of 18–66 years, and the average age was 35.88 ± 7.14 years. The length of service was 11.95 ± 6.44 years. The knowledge of procedures 1a and 2a declared by the respondents [OR = 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22–1.86), x 2 = 14.76], the ability to operate a suction unit [OR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.44–2.08, x 2 = 34.58)], the frequency of airway clearance training (p < < 0.001, x 2 = 61.74). Only 15% of respondents used a suction unit on an injured person during operations. Conclusions: The knowledge of firefighters in the subject matter covered by the analysis is diverse, some firefighters have additional experience and practice from working in health care units. Professional development in the field of QFA supplemented with procedures 1a and 2a may translate into a lower risk of infection associated with airway clearing in the era of the pandemic. There is a visible need for constant training of SFS officers in terms of medical activities to maintain the knowledge of firefighters at a high initial level.","PeriodicalId":18485,"journal":{"name":"Medical Research Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/mrj.a2022.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of the procedure for clearing the respiratory tract and updated qualified first aid (QFA) 1a and 2a procedures by firefighters serving in State Fire Service (SFS) rescue and firefighting units, and their knowledge of the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Material and methods: The cross-sectional study covered 19 408 firefighters (officers serving in SFS rescue and firefighting units from all over Poland). The study was conducted using the diagnostic survey method, the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique consisting of a set of particulars regarding a specific officer and the appropriate medical part of the survey. Results: In the group of 19,408 respondents, 99.31% were men (n = 19,275), while women accounted for 0.69% (n = 133; p < 0.001). The age of the respondents was in the range of 18–66 years, and the average age was 35.88 ± 7.14 years. The length of service was 11.95 ± 6.44 years. The knowledge of procedures 1a and 2a declared by the respondents [OR = 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22–1.86), x 2 = 14.76], the ability to operate a suction unit [OR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.44–2.08, x 2 = 34.58)], the frequency of airway clearance training (p < < 0.001, x 2 = 61.74). Only 15% of respondents used a suction unit on an injured person during operations. Conclusions: The knowledge of firefighters in the subject matter covered by the analysis is diverse, some firefighters have additional experience and practice from working in health care units. Professional development in the field of QFA supplemented with procedures 1a and 2a may translate into a lower risk of infection associated with airway clearing in the era of the pandemic. There is a visible need for constant training of SFS officers in terms of medical activities to maintain the knowledge of firefighters at a high initial level.
消防员对疑似感染生物材料(SARS-CoV-2)的伤者呼吸道清理程序知识的了解情况——一项全国性的横断面研究
本研究的目的是评估在州消防局(SFS)救援和消防单位工作的消防员对呼吸道清理程序和更新的合格急救(QFA) 1a和2a程序的知识,以及他们对SARS-CoV-2病毒传播的知识。材料和方法:横断面研究涵盖了19 408名消防员(来自波兰各地的SFS救援和消防单位的官员)。该研究采用诊断调查方法,即计算机辅助网络访谈(CAWI)技术,包括一组关于特定官员的细节和调查的适当医疗部分。结果:19408名被调查者中,男性占99.31% (n = 19275),女性占0.69% (n = 133;P < 0.001)。调查对象年龄18 ~ 66岁,平均年龄35.88±7.14岁。服务年限为11.95±6.44年。被调查者对程序1a和2a的了解程度[OR = 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22-1.86), x2 = 14.76],操作吸引器的能力[OR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.44-2.08, x2 = 34.58)],气道间隙训练的频率(p < < 0.001, x2 = 61.74)。只有15%的受访者在手术中对受伤人员使用了抽吸装置。结论:消防员在分析所涵盖的主题方面的知识是多种多样的,一些消防员有在卫生保健单位工作的额外经验和实践。QFA领域的专业发展与1a和2a程序相辅相成,可在大流行时期降低与气道清理相关的感染风险。显然,需要在医疗活动方面不断培训安全服务处官员,以使消防员的初级知识保持在较高水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信