Determinants of depression and anxiety in patients with refractory epilepsy and cognitive problems

V. Ekaterina
{"title":"Determinants of depression and anxiety in patients with refractory epilepsy and cognitive problems","authors":"V. Ekaterina","doi":"10.14800/MCE.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"800x600 Background and Purpose: Few studies of psychopathology in patients with cognitive problems and refractory epilepsy (RE) have been performed . We aimed to assess depression, anxiety, and their determining factors in Bulgarian patients with RE and cognitive problems. Method s: We conduct ed a study based on questionnaires designed for people with intellectual disability (stigma scale, Glasgow Depression Scale, Glasgow Anxiety Scale) and a purposeful interview on clinical and social factors of 6 4 patients with RE and cognitive problems . Results : We found depression in 40.63% and anxiety in 71.43% of study participants. Depression correlated with female gender P < 0.01 ( c 2 = 6.48), seizure type P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 7.68), seizure severity P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 9.04), educational level P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 3.86), and stigma P < 0.01 ( c 2 = 12.57). Seizure severity, gender, stigma, and educational level proved to be predictors of depression on multivariate regression analysis P < 0.001 (F = 12.08). Anxiety correlated with seizure severity P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 8.65), focal neurological deficit P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 5.91), stigma P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 7.01), and depression P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 5.31). Seizure severity and focal neurological deficit were the only predictors of anxiety on multivariate regression analysis P < 0.001 (F = 6.35). Conclusions : W e have affirmed frequent anxiety and depression in patients with RE and cognitive problems and their clinical, social, and demographic determinants. The results from our study prove the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to these patients. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0cm; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:10.0pt; \n font-family:\"Times New Roman\",\"serif\";}","PeriodicalId":18603,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/MCE.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

800x600 Background and Purpose: Few studies of psychopathology in patients with cognitive problems and refractory epilepsy (RE) have been performed . We aimed to assess depression, anxiety, and their determining factors in Bulgarian patients with RE and cognitive problems. Method s: We conduct ed a study based on questionnaires designed for people with intellectual disability (stigma scale, Glasgow Depression Scale, Glasgow Anxiety Scale) and a purposeful interview on clinical and social factors of 6 4 patients with RE and cognitive problems . Results : We found depression in 40.63% and anxiety in 71.43% of study participants. Depression correlated with female gender P < 0.01 ( c 2 = 6.48), seizure type P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 7.68), seizure severity P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 9.04), educational level P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 3.86), and stigma P < 0.01 ( c 2 = 12.57). Seizure severity, gender, stigma, and educational level proved to be predictors of depression on multivariate regression analysis P < 0.001 (F = 12.08). Anxiety correlated with seizure severity P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 8.65), focal neurological deficit P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 5.91), stigma P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 7.01), and depression P < 0.05 ( c 2 = 5.31). Seizure severity and focal neurological deficit were the only predictors of anxiety on multivariate regression analysis P < 0.001 (F = 6.35). Conclusions : W e have affirmed frequent anxiety and depression in patients with RE and cognitive problems and their clinical, social, and demographic determinants. The results from our study prove the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to these patients. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
难治性癫痫和认知问题患者抑郁和焦虑的决定因素
背景与目的:认知障碍和难治性癫痫(RE)患者的精神病理学研究很少。我们的目的是评估保加利亚患有RE和认知问题的患者的抑郁、焦虑及其决定因素。方法:采用智障人士调查问卷(耻感量表、格拉斯哥抑郁量表、格拉斯哥焦虑量表)和目的访谈法,对64例有认知障碍的智障患者进行临床及社会因素调查。结果:抑郁和焦虑分别占40.63%和71.43%。抑郁症与女性性别P < 0.01 (c 2 = 6.48)、发作类型P < 0.05 (c 2 = 7.68)、发作严重程度P < 0.05 (c 2 = 9.04)、文化程度P < 0.05 (c 2 = 3.86)、病耻感P < 0.01 (c 2 = 12.57)相关。多因素回归分析显示,癫痫发作严重程度、性别、病耻感和受教育程度是抑郁症的预测因素,P < 0.001 (F = 12.08)。焦虑与癫痫发作严重程度P < 0.05 (c 2 = 8.65)、局灶性神经功能缺损P < 0.05 (c 2 = 5.91)、病耻感P < 0.05 (c 2 = 7.01)、抑郁P < 0.05 (c 2 = 5.31)相关。多变量回归分析显示,癫痫发作严重程度和局灶性神经功能缺损是焦虑的唯一预测因子,P < 0.001 (F = 6.35)。结论:我们已经确认了RE患者和认知问题及其临床、社会和人口统计学决定因素中频繁出现的焦虑和抑郁。我们的研究结果证明了对这些患者采取多学科方法的必要性。正常0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table。mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0;mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0;mso-style-noshow:是的;mso-style-priority: 99;mso-style-parent:“”;Mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt;mso-para-margin: 0厘米;mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;mso-pagination: widow-orphan;字体大小:10.0分;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信