Challenges in Contact Tracing and Sampling in Three Districts of Western Rajasthan during the COVID-19 Pandemic

L. N. Sinha, S. Bodat, D. Kaur, D. Tanwar, A. Deep, A. Mathur, N. Mathur
{"title":"Challenges in Contact Tracing and Sampling in Three Districts of Western Rajasthan during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"L. N. Sinha, S. Bodat, D. Kaur, D. Tanwar, A. Deep, A. Mathur, N. Mathur","doi":"10.37506/ijphrd.v13i1.17374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Contact tracing commenced in districts of Western Rajasthan in March 2020 to control the spread of Covid-19.It was an ongoing process involving isolation and sampling of contacts. Multi department Quick and Rapid response teams (Q/RRT) worked continuously as the pandemic passed through different stages. The objectives of the study was to compare the challenges faced during contact tracing and document good practices in place. Methods: A cross –sectional study was done among contact tracers using a semi structured questionnaire in Google forms in three districts of Pali, Jodhpur and Barmer. Keeping power of study at 80%, 5% error and 95% confidence interval, assuming 50% prevalence of effective contact tracing and 10 % non-response total 400, i.e 133 participants from each district. Results: Major challenges faced by tracers were resistance to contact sampling (64%)lack of training (49%), and random sampling workload (47%). Overall 36% of contacts had downloaded the Aarogya setu app but among them only 68% were using the app. Trainings, workload distribution and inter-sectoral coordination was best in Jodhpur, Barmer and Pali respectively. Conclusions: Trainings helped in better field management of resistance to sampling among contacts. Excessive workload of lab technicians lead to errors in reporting. Transport for sampling of contacts was a challenge in remote areas. The Aarogya setu app was not used by all contacts. Regular feedback meetings by local administration helped in effective contact tracing.","PeriodicalId":13368,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v13i1.17374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Contact tracing commenced in districts of Western Rajasthan in March 2020 to control the spread of Covid-19.It was an ongoing process involving isolation and sampling of contacts. Multi department Quick and Rapid response teams (Q/RRT) worked continuously as the pandemic passed through different stages. The objectives of the study was to compare the challenges faced during contact tracing and document good practices in place. Methods: A cross –sectional study was done among contact tracers using a semi structured questionnaire in Google forms in three districts of Pali, Jodhpur and Barmer. Keeping power of study at 80%, 5% error and 95% confidence interval, assuming 50% prevalence of effective contact tracing and 10 % non-response total 400, i.e 133 participants from each district. Results: Major challenges faced by tracers were resistance to contact sampling (64%)lack of training (49%), and random sampling workload (47%). Overall 36% of contacts had downloaded the Aarogya setu app but among them only 68% were using the app. Trainings, workload distribution and inter-sectoral coordination was best in Jodhpur, Barmer and Pali respectively. Conclusions: Trainings helped in better field management of resistance to sampling among contacts. Excessive workload of lab technicians lead to errors in reporting. Transport for sampling of contacts was a challenge in remote areas. The Aarogya setu app was not used by all contacts. Regular feedback meetings by local administration helped in effective contact tracing.
在COVID-19大流行期间,拉贾斯坦邦西部三个地区接触者追踪和抽样面临的挑战
导语:为控制Covid-19的传播,拉贾斯坦邦西部地区于2020年3月开始追踪接触者。这是一个持续的过程,涉及对接触者进行隔离和抽样。随着大流行经历不同阶段,多部门快速反应小组(Q/RRT)不断开展工作。该研究的目的是比较接触者追踪过程中面临的挑战,并记录现有的良好做法。方法:在巴利、焦特布尔和巴默三个地区使用半结构化问卷对接触者进行横断面研究。假设有效接触者追踪率为50%,无应答率为10%,总共400人,即来自每个地区的133名参与者,将研究效力保持在80%,5%误差和95%置信区间。结果:示踪人员面临的主要挑战是对接触抽样的抗拒(64%)、缺乏培训(49%)和随机抽样工作量(47%)。总体而言,36%的联系人下载了Aarogya setu应用程序,但其中只有68%的人在使用该应用程序。培训、工作量分配和部门间协调在焦特布尔、巴默和巴利语分别是最好的。结论:培训有助于更好地管理接触者的抽样抗性。实验室技术人员的过度工作量导致报告错误。在偏远地区,运送接触者取样是一项挑战。并不是所有联系人都使用了Aarogya setu应用。地方行政部门定期召开反馈会议有助于有效追踪接触者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信