Effect of Bio-Agents, Neem Leaf Extract and Fungicides Against Alternaria Leaf Blight of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

S. S. Kakraliya, Dechan Choskit, D. Pandit, Sonali Abrol
{"title":"Effect of Bio-Agents, Neem Leaf Extract and Fungicides Against Alternaria Leaf Blight of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)","authors":"S. S. Kakraliya, Dechan Choskit, D. Pandit, Sonali Abrol","doi":"10.4172/2329-6836.1000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment was conducted under in vitro and field conditions to observe the effect of bio-agents, botanical and fungicides against Alternaria triticina. Eight treatments were taken up with three replications and data collected was analyzed using CRD. Maximum inhibition percent mycelia growth was observed in Propiconazole (89.72%), Hexaconazole (88.44%), Vitavax (87.70%), followed by Trichoderma harzianum (85.50%), Trichoderma viride (83.30%), Pseudomonas fluorescens (80.73%) and neem leaf extract (73.57%) as compared to control (0). An experiment was conducted under field condition to observe the effect of bio-agents, neem leaf extract and fungicides against Alternaria triticina. Eight treatments were taken up with three replications and data collected was analyzed using RBD. Maximum plant height (cm) was observed in T. viride (78.82 cm) followed by T. harzianum (78.27 cm) as compared to control (70.04 cm). T. viride was significantly superior as compared to other treatments. Minimum disease intensity per cent and production of wheat was recorded in treatment Propiconazole @0.1% (18.24% and 37.00 q/ha respectively) followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens @0.5% (20.51% and 30.44 q/ha), as compared to control (43.18% and 20.41 q/ha). Propiconazole was significantly superior as compared to other treatments.","PeriodicalId":18897,"journal":{"name":"Natural products chemistry & research","volume":"47 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural products chemistry & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6836.1000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The experiment was conducted under in vitro and field conditions to observe the effect of bio-agents, botanical and fungicides against Alternaria triticina. Eight treatments were taken up with three replications and data collected was analyzed using CRD. Maximum inhibition percent mycelia growth was observed in Propiconazole (89.72%), Hexaconazole (88.44%), Vitavax (87.70%), followed by Trichoderma harzianum (85.50%), Trichoderma viride (83.30%), Pseudomonas fluorescens (80.73%) and neem leaf extract (73.57%) as compared to control (0). An experiment was conducted under field condition to observe the effect of bio-agents, neem leaf extract and fungicides against Alternaria triticina. Eight treatments were taken up with three replications and data collected was analyzed using RBD. Maximum plant height (cm) was observed in T. viride (78.82 cm) followed by T. harzianum (78.27 cm) as compared to control (70.04 cm). T. viride was significantly superior as compared to other treatments. Minimum disease intensity per cent and production of wheat was recorded in treatment Propiconazole @0.1% (18.24% and 37.00 q/ha respectively) followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens @0.5% (20.51% and 30.44 q/ha), as compared to control (43.18% and 20.41 q/ha). Propiconazole was significantly superior as compared to other treatments.
生物制剂、印楝叶提取物和杀菌剂防治小麦白叶枯病的效果研究
在田间和体外条件下,研究了生物药剂、植物药剂和杀菌剂对小麦锈菌的防治效果。8个处理,3个重复,收集数据用CRD进行分析。以丙环康唑(89.72%)、六康唑(88.44%)、维他伐(87.70%)对菌丝生长的抑制率最高,其次为哈茨木霉(85.50%)、绿色木霉(83.30%)、荧光假单胞菌(80.73%)和印楝叶提取物(73.57%),与对照(0)比较。采用田间试验,观察生物制剂、印楝叶提取物和杀菌剂对小麦锈菌的抑制效果。8个处理,3个重复,收集的数据用RBD进行分析。植株高度最高的品种为绿t (78.82 cm),其次为哈兹纳姆(78.27 cm),而对照品种为70.04 cm。与其他处理相比,绿t显着优于其他处理。与对照(43.18%和20.41 q/ha)相比,0.1%丙环唑处理(分别为18.24%和37.00 q/ha)和0.5%荧光假单胞菌处理(分别为20.51%和30.44 q/ha)的小麦病强和产量最低。丙环康唑治疗效果明显优于其他治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信