Circulatory responses to propofol-ketamine combination compared to propofol alone for sedation during spinal anesthesia

S. Nengroo, A. Lone, I. Naqash
{"title":"Circulatory responses to propofol-ketamine combination compared to propofol alone for sedation during spinal anesthesia","authors":"S. Nengroo, A. Lone, I. Naqash","doi":"10.4314/IJMU.V6I2.68188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was undertaken to establish the efficacy of low dose propofol-ketamine infusion in maintaining hemodynamic stability when used for sedation as compared to propofol alone during spinal anesthesia. Sixty adult patients of either sex, belonging to ASA physical status I and II undergoing urological procedures were studied in a randomized manner. After administering spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, patients were assigned to two groups of 30 patients each. Group I (propofol-ketamine combination) received intial loading dose of propofol and ketamine followed by a continuous infusion of low dose propofol and ketamine whereas group II (propofol alone) received a bolus dose of propofol followed by a continuous infusion of propofol only. Hemodynamic parameters like heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and sedation scores rated on a five point scale were recorded at baseline and at the predetermined intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after spinal anesthesia. It was found that heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in group I patients at various intervals as compared to group II patients, however sedation scores revealed no significant difference at different time intervals between the two groups. In conclusion propofol-ketamine combination was found to confer hemodynamic stability during spinal anesthesia as compared to propofol alone.","PeriodicalId":14472,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Medical Update - EJOURNAL","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Medical Update - EJOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/IJMU.V6I2.68188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to establish the efficacy of low dose propofol-ketamine infusion in maintaining hemodynamic stability when used for sedation as compared to propofol alone during spinal anesthesia. Sixty adult patients of either sex, belonging to ASA physical status I and II undergoing urological procedures were studied in a randomized manner. After administering spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, patients were assigned to two groups of 30 patients each. Group I (propofol-ketamine combination) received intial loading dose of propofol and ketamine followed by a continuous infusion of low dose propofol and ketamine whereas group II (propofol alone) received a bolus dose of propofol followed by a continuous infusion of propofol only. Hemodynamic parameters like heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and sedation scores rated on a five point scale were recorded at baseline and at the predetermined intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after spinal anesthesia. It was found that heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in group I patients at various intervals as compared to group II patients, however sedation scores revealed no significant difference at different time intervals between the two groups. In conclusion propofol-ketamine combination was found to confer hemodynamic stability during spinal anesthesia as compared to propofol alone.
丙泊酚-氯胺酮联合应用与丙泊酚单用脊柱麻醉时的循环反应比较
本研究旨在建立低剂量异丙酚-氯胺酮输注在脊髓麻醉中维持血液动力学稳定性的效果,并与单用异丙酚进行比较。本研究以随机方式研究了60例ASA身体状态为I和II的接受泌尿外科手术的成年患者。在给予0.5%布比卡因脊髓麻醉后,将患者分为两组,每组30例。组1(异丙酚-氯胺酮联合)初始负荷剂量异丙酚和氯胺酮,然后连续输注低剂量异丙酚和氯胺酮,而组2(异丙酚单独)接受大剂量异丙酚,然后仅持续输注异丙酚。在基线和脊髓麻醉后5、10、15、20、25、30、45、60、75和90分钟的预定时间间隔记录心率、收缩压、舒张压等血液动力学参数和镇静评分(五分制)。结果发现,I组患者心率、收缩压和舒张压在不同时间间隔内均明显高于II组患者,而镇静评分在不同时间间隔内无显著差异。总之,与单独使用异丙酚相比,丙泊酚-氯胺酮联合使用可使脊髓麻醉期间的血流动力学稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信