Claiming the City through the Cape Verdean Festivities of Kola San Jon in Lisbon: A Lefebvrian Case Study

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Carolino, Francesco Biagi
{"title":"Claiming the City through the Cape Verdean Festivities of Kola San Jon in Lisbon: A Lefebvrian Case Study","authors":"J. Carolino, Francesco Biagi","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2021.2024765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As cities experience the effects of increasing inequalities, so social movements, scholars and even mainstream institutions are once again placing Lefebvre's notion of the “right to the city” on the agenda. This new popularity often strips the concept of its political meaning, namely by approaching Lefebvre's notion as juridical and as an aspect of a more general way of proceeding by planning, that has effects in terms of what is recognised as part of the political sphere, and of claiming the city. We aim to contribute to the debate through the discussion of a case study interested in a yearly festive event in central Lisbon. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre's lexicon for an interpretation of popular involvement with public urban life, the article starts with an account of Lisbon's Fordist socio-spatial segregation, and the neoliberal deepening of gentrification and profit-making urban regeneration. It then focuses on the Cape Verdean performative event Kola San Jon in the context of Lisbon's Festas da Cidade, and the active involvement of inhabitants of Cova da Moura, a marginalised neighbourhood which has, over the years, drawn on cultural and civic activities for reclaiming a voice in the public space.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"85 1","pages":"133 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2021.2024765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT As cities experience the effects of increasing inequalities, so social movements, scholars and even mainstream institutions are once again placing Lefebvre's notion of the “right to the city” on the agenda. This new popularity often strips the concept of its political meaning, namely by approaching Lefebvre's notion as juridical and as an aspect of a more general way of proceeding by planning, that has effects in terms of what is recognised as part of the political sphere, and of claiming the city. We aim to contribute to the debate through the discussion of a case study interested in a yearly festive event in central Lisbon. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre's lexicon for an interpretation of popular involvement with public urban life, the article starts with an account of Lisbon's Fordist socio-spatial segregation, and the neoliberal deepening of gentrification and profit-making urban regeneration. It then focuses on the Cape Verdean performative event Kola San Jon in the context of Lisbon's Festas da Cidade, and the active involvement of inhabitants of Cova da Moura, a marginalised neighbourhood which has, over the years, drawn on cultural and civic activities for reclaiming a voice in the public space.
通过佛得角在里斯本的科拉圣乔恩庆祝活动来占领城市:一个列非弗人的案例研究
随着城市日益加剧的不平等现象的影响,社会运动、学者甚至主流机构都再次将列斐伏尔的“城市权”概念提上日程。这种新的流行往往剥离了其政治意义的概念,即通过将列斐伏尔的概念接近为司法概念,并将其作为一种更一般的方式进行规划,这在被认为是政治领域的一部分方面产生了影响,并声称拥有城市。我们的目标是通过讨论一个对里斯本市中心一年一度的节日活动感兴趣的案例研究来促进辩论。利用亨利·列斐伏尔的词汇来解释大众对公共城市生活的参与,文章首先描述了里斯本的福特主义社会空间隔离,以及新自由主义对士绅化和盈利城市再生的深化。然后重点关注佛得角在里斯本节日背景下的表演活动Kola San Jon,以及Cova da Moura居民的积极参与,Cova da Moura是一个边缘化的社区,多年来,该社区通过文化和公民活动在公共空间中重新获得声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信