Accuracy of automatic QT measurement techniques

N. McLaughlin, R. Campbell, A. Murray
{"title":"Accuracy of automatic QT measurement techniques","authors":"N. McLaughlin, R. Campbell, A. Murray","doi":"10.1109/CIC.1993.378348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare, against manual measurement, 3 algorithms for automatic QT interval measurement using eight 4 lead ECGs recorded from normal subjects. The algorithms investigated determined T wave end from (a) the intercept of the isoelectric line and maximum T wave slope, thresholds applied to (b) the T wave and (c) the differential of the T wave. Mean manual-automatic QT measurement differences of 27 to 29 ms for algorithm a, -2 to 20 ms for b and -5 to 4 ms for c were found. The standard deviations (SD) of the manual-automatic differences varied from 9 to 30 ms. Failure to measure the QT interval (1 to 12 cases) occurred with only algorithm b. Each algorithm performed differently with the mean and SD of the differences, and failure rate for b, dependent on threshold and isoelectric levels used.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":20445,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","volume":"95 1","pages":"863-866"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.1993.378348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare, against manual measurement, 3 algorithms for automatic QT interval measurement using eight 4 lead ECGs recorded from normal subjects. The algorithms investigated determined T wave end from (a) the intercept of the isoelectric line and maximum T wave slope, thresholds applied to (b) the T wave and (c) the differential of the T wave. Mean manual-automatic QT measurement differences of 27 to 29 ms for algorithm a, -2 to 20 ms for b and -5 to 4 ms for c were found. The standard deviations (SD) of the manual-automatic differences varied from 9 to 30 ms. Failure to measure the QT interval (1 to 12 cases) occurred with only algorithm b. Each algorithm performed differently with the mean and SD of the differences, and failure rate for b, dependent on threshold and isoelectric levels used.<>
QT自动测量技术的准确性
本研究的目的是比较使用正常受试者8张4导联心电图自动测量QT间期的3种算法与人工测量方法的比较。所研究的算法从(a)等电线的截距和最大T波斜率,(b) T波的阈值和(c) T波的微分来确定T波结束。发现算法a的平均手动-自动QT测量差异为27 ~ 29 ms,算法b为-2 ~ 20 ms,算法c为-5 ~ 4 ms。手动-自动差异的标准偏差(SD)为9 ~ 30 ms。只有算法b无法测量QT间期(1至12例)。每种算法的表现不同,差异的平均值和SD,以及b的失败率,取决于所使用的阈值和等电水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信