LACK OF ONE COMMON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE? IS REGULATION ON THE EU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE NECESSARY IN THE EU?

Q4 Social Sciences
Ana Đanić Čeko
{"title":"LACK OF ONE COMMON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE? IS REGULATION ON THE EU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE NECESSARY IN THE EU?","authors":"Ana Đanić Čeko","doi":"10.46763/bssr20150094djc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The result of expanding jurisdiction of the European Union (hereinafter: EU) is not only the increase in number of sectors in which special administrative procedures are enforced, but also the increase in number of corresponding bodies and agencies. The current state is characterised by lack of coordination and uniformity and absence of codified procedural rules which makes it difficult for the EU citizens to easily and completely understand their administrative rights and contributes to deterioration of their legal protection. This is not in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (hereinafter: Charter), which guarantees its citizens the right to good administration (Article 41). The authors deem that the standardization of the sectoral administrative rules would lead to simplification and rationalisation of the administrative procedures. European Administrative Law is developed through the practice of the Court of Justice of the EU (hereinafter: CJEU) that has formulated a series of general administrative principles to be followed in order for administrative procedures to maintain their legitimacy. Nevertheless, the legislator is considered to be the one who determines clear procedural rules, thus contributing to legal safety and predictability. Discussing the need for codification of the Law on Administrative Procedure of the European Union (hereinafter: EU APA) has thus become even more relevant. However, the question that constantly arises is whether the regulation on common administrative procedure is necessary in the EU legislation and if so to what extent. The necessity to regulate the minimum of common procedural standards and principles of good Ana ĐANIĆ ĈEKO, Tunjica PETRAŠEVIĆ 94 Balkan Social Science Review, Vol. 15, June 2020, 93-117 administration along with the procedures of EU institutions when resolving individual cases of physical and legal persons is emphasised by the European Parliament Resolution of 15 th January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on the Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union (2012/2024(INL)). The legal basis contained in the Article 298 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: TFEU) is also emphasized. This paper will conclude with a brief review of the results of public consultation on the European Union‟s administrative law.","PeriodicalId":36799,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Social Science Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"94-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr20150094djc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The result of expanding jurisdiction of the European Union (hereinafter: EU) is not only the increase in number of sectors in which special administrative procedures are enforced, but also the increase in number of corresponding bodies and agencies. The current state is characterised by lack of coordination and uniformity and absence of codified procedural rules which makes it difficult for the EU citizens to easily and completely understand their administrative rights and contributes to deterioration of their legal protection. This is not in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (hereinafter: Charter), which guarantees its citizens the right to good administration (Article 41). The authors deem that the standardization of the sectoral administrative rules would lead to simplification and rationalisation of the administrative procedures. European Administrative Law is developed through the practice of the Court of Justice of the EU (hereinafter: CJEU) that has formulated a series of general administrative principles to be followed in order for administrative procedures to maintain their legitimacy. Nevertheless, the legislator is considered to be the one who determines clear procedural rules, thus contributing to legal safety and predictability. Discussing the need for codification of the Law on Administrative Procedure of the European Union (hereinafter: EU APA) has thus become even more relevant. However, the question that constantly arises is whether the regulation on common administrative procedure is necessary in the EU legislation and if so to what extent. The necessity to regulate the minimum of common procedural standards and principles of good Ana ĐANIĆ ĈEKO, Tunjica PETRAŠEVIĆ 94 Balkan Social Science Review, Vol. 15, June 2020, 93-117 administration along with the procedures of EU institutions when resolving individual cases of physical and legal persons is emphasised by the European Parliament Resolution of 15 th January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on the Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union (2012/2024(INL)). The legal basis contained in the Article 298 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: TFEU) is also emphasized. This paper will conclude with a brief review of the results of public consultation on the European Union‟s administrative law.
缺少一个共同的行政程序?欧盟是否有必要对欧盟行政程序进行监管?
欧洲联盟(以下简称欧盟)管辖权扩大的结果,不仅是执行特别行政程序的部门增加,而且相应的机构和机构也增加了。欧盟行政管理的现状表现为缺乏协调统一和程序化规则的缺失,这使得欧盟公民难以轻松、完整地理解其行政权利,并导致其法律保护的恶化。这不符合《欧洲联盟基本权利宪章》(以下简称《宪章》),该宪章保障其公民享有良好管理的权利(第41条)。发件人认为,部门行政规则的标准化将导致行政程序的简化和合理化。欧洲行政法是通过欧盟法院(以下简称:CJEU)的实践而发展起来的,它制定了一系列行政程序必须遵循的一般行政原则,以保持行政程序的合法性。然而,立法者被认为是确定明确程序规则的人,从而有助于法律安全和可预测性。因此,讨论《欧洲联盟行政程序法》(以下简称《欧盟行政程序法》)的法典化必要性就显得更为重要。然而,欧盟立法中对共同行政程序的规定是否必要,以及在何种程度上必要,一直是人们关注的问题。规范善意善意最低限度共同程序标准和原则的必要性ĐANIĆ ĈEKO, Tunjica PETRAŠEVIĆ 94《巴尔干社会科学评论》第15卷,2020年6月,2013年1月15日欧洲议会决议(2012/2024(INL))向欧盟行政程序法委员会提出建议,强调了93-117行政管理以及欧盟机构在解决自然人和法人个案时的程序。还强调《欧洲联盟运作条约》(下称:《欧洲联盟运作条约》)第298(1)条所载的法律基础。本文最后将简要回顾欧盟行政法公众咨询的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Balkan Social Science Review
Balkan Social Science Review Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信