Developing supplementary reading materials to promote critical thinking for the X grade students of vocational high school based on the 2013 Curriculum

C. Utami
{"title":"Developing supplementary reading materials to promote critical thinking for the X grade students of vocational high school based on the 2013 Curriculum","authors":"C. Utami","doi":"10.36597/JELP.V3I1.2864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is aimed at developing supplementary reading materials to promote critical thinking as a part of the 21st-century competencies (Critical thinking, Creativity and Innovation, Communication and Collaboration) and to reveal the effectiveness of the developed product. The methodology was Research and Development by Borg and Gall (1983). The research steps consist of three main stages; (1) preliminary study covering document analysis, classroom observation, and need analysis, (2) development covering drafting, internal experts judgement, revision, a prototype of the product, (3) field testing covering try out, reflection and interview, external expert judgement, revision, and final product. In analyzing the data, the researcher used descriptive qualitative research. It was adapted from Qualitative Data Analysis by Miles, Huberman & Saldana (1994) that are condensing data, displaying data, drawing, and verifying conclusion. The results of the preliminary study showed that supplementary reading materials to promote the 4’Cs were needed. The textbook evaluation revealed that there were four chapters (chapter 1, chapter 5, chapter 8 and chapter 12) which need to be developed. In need analysis, the researcher interviewed three English teachers and nine students who were in low, middle and high level from the same class. Based on the data, the teachers and the students required the developed product. The researcher then made abound of drafts which were then revised into the prototype of the product. The developed product was tried out in class X TKJ A SMKN 1 Saptosari by having collaboration with the fellow teachers. To catch the real situation, the researcher recorded the teaching and learning process, wrote the transcripts, noted the classroom observation, and did reflection. After the final revision, the supplementary reading materials came to the final product. The try out proved that the developed supplementary reading materials are effective in promoting critical thinking. Based on the analysis, the students are able to complete the tasks that were designed to promote critical thinking ( making predictions, differentiating relevant and irrelevant information, relating different concepts, thinking inductively, and comparing or analyzing the texts).","PeriodicalId":32887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","volume":"10 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36597/JELP.V3I1.2864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is aimed at developing supplementary reading materials to promote critical thinking as a part of the 21st-century competencies (Critical thinking, Creativity and Innovation, Communication and Collaboration) and to reveal the effectiveness of the developed product. The methodology was Research and Development by Borg and Gall (1983). The research steps consist of three main stages; (1) preliminary study covering document analysis, classroom observation, and need analysis, (2) development covering drafting, internal experts judgement, revision, a prototype of the product, (3) field testing covering try out, reflection and interview, external expert judgement, revision, and final product. In analyzing the data, the researcher used descriptive qualitative research. It was adapted from Qualitative Data Analysis by Miles, Huberman & Saldana (1994) that are condensing data, displaying data, drawing, and verifying conclusion. The results of the preliminary study showed that supplementary reading materials to promote the 4’Cs were needed. The textbook evaluation revealed that there were four chapters (chapter 1, chapter 5, chapter 8 and chapter 12) which need to be developed. In need analysis, the researcher interviewed three English teachers and nine students who were in low, middle and high level from the same class. Based on the data, the teachers and the students required the developed product. The researcher then made abound of drafts which were then revised into the prototype of the product. The developed product was tried out in class X TKJ A SMKN 1 Saptosari by having collaboration with the fellow teachers. To catch the real situation, the researcher recorded the teaching and learning process, wrote the transcripts, noted the classroom observation, and did reflection. After the final revision, the supplementary reading materials came to the final product. The try out proved that the developed supplementary reading materials are effective in promoting critical thinking. Based on the analysis, the students are able to complete the tasks that were designed to promote critical thinking ( making predictions, differentiating relevant and irrelevant information, relating different concepts, thinking inductively, and comparing or analyzing the texts).
基于2013年版课程,开发促进职业高中X年级学生批判性思维的辅助阅读材料
本研究旨在开发辅助阅读材料,以促进批判性思维作为21st-centuryÂ能力(批判性思维,创造力和创新,沟通和协作)的一部分,并揭示开发产品的有效性。方法是Borg和Gall(1983)的《研究与发展》。研究步骤主要分为三个阶段;(1)初步研究,包括文献分析、课堂观察和需求分析;(2)开发,包括起草、内部专家判断、修改、产品原型;(3)现场测试,包括试用、反思和访谈、外部专家判断、修改和最终产品。在分析数据时,研究者使用了描述性定性研究。它改编自Miles, Huberman和Saldana(1994)的定性数据分析,即压缩数据,显示数据,绘制和验证结论。初步研究结果表明,需要补充阅读材料来促进4€™c。评价结果显示,有1章、5章、8章、12章等4章有待完善。在need analysis中,研究者对同一班级的3名英语教师和9名低、中、高水平的学生进行了访谈。根据这些数据,教师和学生对开发的产品提出了要求。然后,研究人员制作了大量的草稿,然后将其修改为产品的原型。开发的产品已在X TKJ A SMKN 1 Saptosari班与其他老师合作试用。为了捕捉真实情况,研究者记录了教与学的过程,写了成绩单,记录了课堂观察,做了反思。经过最后的复习,补充阅读材料就成了最终的成品。实验证明,开发的辅助阅读材料对培养批判性思维是有效的。在分析的基础上,学生能够完成旨在促进批判性思维的任务(做出预测,区分相关和不相关的信息,将不同的概念联系起来,归纳思考,比较或分析文本)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信