Political value-congruent climate change communication: an efficacy study from Germany and Austria (Congruencia de valores en la comunicación política del cambio climático: un estudio de eficacia de Alemania y Austria)

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Naara Ulmke, Johannes Klackl, Jochim Hansen, Pascal Lempe, Verena Finsterwalder, Lucas Hagedorn, Tom Rosenzweig, Lena Ramstetter, Tilmann Hüppauf, E. Jonas
{"title":"Political value-congruent climate change communication: an efficacy study from Germany and Austria (Congruencia de valores en la comunicación política del cambio climático: un estudio de eficacia de Alemania y Austria)","authors":"Naara Ulmke, Johannes Klackl, Jochim Hansen, Pascal Lempe, Verena Finsterwalder, Lucas Hagedorn, Tom Rosenzweig, Lena Ramstetter, Tilmann Hüppauf, E. Jonas","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2023.2204728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To successfully battle climate change, it is crucial to reach people across political camps and national borders. Research from dual-party systems indicates that climate change communication is most effective when it addresses how climate action promotes recipients’ political values. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no such evidence from multi-party systems. To fill this gap, we conducted three studies in two Central European, German-speaking countries: Germany and Austria. In Study 1, we framed conservative and liberal climate protection messages using values from Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values. Liberals agreed more with the liberally framed than with the conservatively framed climate protection message. In Study 2, we framed the climate protection message based on moral foundations. Conservative participants agreed more with the conservatively framed climate protection message than with the liberally framed one. Study 3 integrated values from multiple frameworks, and ultimately conservatives as well as liberals agreed more to climate protection statements that touched on values reflecting their political ideology. Thus, empirical findings from dual-party systems hold for countries with more than two parties.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"10 1","pages":"183 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2023.2204728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT To successfully battle climate change, it is crucial to reach people across political camps and national borders. Research from dual-party systems indicates that climate change communication is most effective when it addresses how climate action promotes recipients’ political values. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no such evidence from multi-party systems. To fill this gap, we conducted three studies in two Central European, German-speaking countries: Germany and Austria. In Study 1, we framed conservative and liberal climate protection messages using values from Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values. Liberals agreed more with the liberally framed than with the conservatively framed climate protection message. In Study 2, we framed the climate protection message based on moral foundations. Conservative participants agreed more with the conservatively framed climate protection message than with the liberally framed one. Study 3 integrated values from multiple frameworks, and ultimately conservatives as well as liberals agreed more to climate protection statements that touched on values reflecting their political ideology. Thus, empirical findings from dual-party systems hold for countries with more than two parties.
政治价值观一致的气候变化沟通:来自德国和奥地利的有效性研究
要成功应对气候变化,跨越政治阵营和国界与人们取得联系至关重要。来自两党制的研究表明,当气候变化沟通涉及气候行动如何促进接受者的政治价值观时,它是最有效的。然而,据我们所知,多党制没有这样的证据。为了填补这一空白,我们在两个中欧德语国家:德国和奥地利进行了三项研究。在研究1中,我们使用施瓦茨的人类基本价值观理论来构建保守和自由的气候保护信息。与保守的气候保护信息相比,自由主义者更同意自由框架的信息。在研究2中,我们基于道德基础构建了气候保护信息。保守派参与者更同意保守框架的气候保护信息,而不是自由框架的信息。研究3综合了来自多个框架的价值观,最终保守派和自由派都更同意涉及反映其政治意识形态的价值观的气候保护声明。因此,两党制的实证研究结果适用于两个以上政党的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信