Do the offline and social media Big Five have the same dimensional structure, mean levels, and predictive validity of social media outcomes?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Cameron J. Bunker, Virginia S. Y. Kwan
{"title":"Do the offline and social media Big Five have the same dimensional structure, mean levels, and predictive validity of social media outcomes?","authors":"Cameron J. Bunker, Virginia S. Y. Kwan","doi":"10.5817/cp2021-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractPrior studies found that the Big Five personality traits are significant predictors of social media outcomes, but they did not specify the situational context of the Big Five. The assumption is that people have the same personality on social media as offline. The present research addressed whether the Big Five are the same on social media as offline in terms of dimensional structure, mean levels, and predictive validity of social media outcomes. Across two samples, 943 college students completed measures of social media outcomes and two versions of the Big Five Inventory-2 adapted from Soto and John (2017), specifying offline and social media contexts. Findings revealed that all of the five dimensions emerged in both contexts, except that a few items might not apply well to the social media context. The mean levels of all five traits were significantly different between contexts, suggesting that the dimensional structure of the offline and social media Big Five are similar but peoples’ levels of expression of the Big Five are not the same between these contexts. Conscientiousness and extraversion were the least similar dimensions out of the five between the contexts. There were also differences in predictive validity between the offline and social media Big Five showing that heavier social media users are more open, conscientious, and extraverted on social media, whereas they are lower on these traits offline. Consequently, studying offline and social media contexts separately and jointly is critical for understanding how the Big Five predict social media outcomes.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2021-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

AbstractPrior studies found that the Big Five personality traits are significant predictors of social media outcomes, but they did not specify the situational context of the Big Five. The assumption is that people have the same personality on social media as offline. The present research addressed whether the Big Five are the same on social media as offline in terms of dimensional structure, mean levels, and predictive validity of social media outcomes. Across two samples, 943 college students completed measures of social media outcomes and two versions of the Big Five Inventory-2 adapted from Soto and John (2017), specifying offline and social media contexts. Findings revealed that all of the five dimensions emerged in both contexts, except that a few items might not apply well to the social media context. The mean levels of all five traits were significantly different between contexts, suggesting that the dimensional structure of the offline and social media Big Five are similar but peoples’ levels of expression of the Big Five are not the same between these contexts. Conscientiousness and extraversion were the least similar dimensions out of the five between the contexts. There were also differences in predictive validity between the offline and social media Big Five showing that heavier social media users are more open, conscientious, and extraverted on social media, whereas they are lower on these traits offline. Consequently, studying offline and social media contexts separately and jointly is critical for understanding how the Big Five predict social media outcomes.
线下和社交媒体五大公司对社交媒体结果的维度结构、平均水平和预测有效性是否相同?
摘要先前的研究发现,五大人格特质对社交媒体结果有显著的预测作用,但它们并没有明确五大人格特质的情境背景。假设人们在社交媒体上和在线下的个性是一样的。本研究从维度结构、平均水平和对社交媒体结果的预测有效性等方面探讨了五大品牌在社交媒体上是否与线下相同。在两个样本中,943名大学生完成了社交媒体结果的测量,以及改编自Soto和John(2017)的两种版本的“五大清单2”,具体说明了线下和社交媒体环境。调查结果显示,除了少数项目可能不适用于社交媒体环境外,这五个维度在两种情况下都出现了。五种特征的平均水平在不同情境下存在显著差异,表明离线和社交媒体大五种特征的维度结构相似,但人们对大五种特征的表达水平在不同情境下并不相同。尽责性和外向性是五个维度中最不相似的。线下和社交媒体五大用户之间的预测效度也存在差异,这表明重度社交媒体用户在社交媒体上更开放、更认真、更外向,而他们在线下的这些特质则较低。因此,对线下和社交媒体背景分别或共同进行研究,对于理解五大媒介如何预测社交媒体结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信