Percutaneous Endoscopic Necrosectomy of Walled-Off Necrosis in Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

G. Lauri, M. Di Stasi, G. Marinone, P. Arcidiacono, S. Russo, R. Conigliaro, G. Aragona
{"title":"Percutaneous Endoscopic Necrosectomy of Walled-Off Necrosis in Post-ERCP Pancreatitis","authors":"G. Lauri, M. Di Stasi, G. Marinone, P. Arcidiacono, S. Russo, R. Conigliaro, G. Aragona","doi":"10.47496/sl.ajscr.2022.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute pancreatitis is the most frequent complication in patients who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with an incidence rate of 3.5-9.7% [1]. 5-10% of these develop acute necrotizing pancreatitis, which may have a pancreatic or peripancreatic localization in 75-80% [2]. We describe a case report of post-ERCP acute necrotizing pancreatitis with walled-off necrosis (WON) treated with percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) [3]. Case Report: A 60-year-old man with obstructive jaundice and common bile duct stones at abdominal CT scan underwent ERCP to clear the biliary tract. In the following days, due to the onset of severe acute pancreatitis and sepsis, he repeated the abdominal CT scan where multiple necrotic collections were found around the pancreas with extension to the pelvic paracolic gutters. Following a step-up approach, targeted antibiotic therapy was started. After four weeks, it was not possible to perform Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided drainage because of the distance from the stomach or the duodenum to the WON. Then percutaneous drainage was radiologically inserted into the collections through the left side of the abdomen of the patient to flush with hydrogen peroxide every day. Due to the persistent infection and necrosis in the collections, an esophageal fully covered self-expanding metal stent was temporarily inserted through the percutaneous fistula in order to increase the caliber of the fistula and to perform PEN. Discussion: The step-up approach suggests endoscopic or percutaneous drainage of infected WON as the first interventional method, depending on the location of the WON and the local expertise [1]. PEN is a safe and effective alternative to surgical treatment with a technical success rate of 47-93% and a complication rate of no more than 20% [4]. Conclusion: PEN is an advanced endoscopic technique that is showing promising results but still needs randomized controlled trials to establish safety and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":7649,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgery and Clinical Case Reports","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgery and Clinical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47496/sl.ajscr.2022.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis is the most frequent complication in patients who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with an incidence rate of 3.5-9.7% [1]. 5-10% of these develop acute necrotizing pancreatitis, which may have a pancreatic or peripancreatic localization in 75-80% [2]. We describe a case report of post-ERCP acute necrotizing pancreatitis with walled-off necrosis (WON) treated with percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) [3]. Case Report: A 60-year-old man with obstructive jaundice and common bile duct stones at abdominal CT scan underwent ERCP to clear the biliary tract. In the following days, due to the onset of severe acute pancreatitis and sepsis, he repeated the abdominal CT scan where multiple necrotic collections were found around the pancreas with extension to the pelvic paracolic gutters. Following a step-up approach, targeted antibiotic therapy was started. After four weeks, it was not possible to perform Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided drainage because of the distance from the stomach or the duodenum to the WON. Then percutaneous drainage was radiologically inserted into the collections through the left side of the abdomen of the patient to flush with hydrogen peroxide every day. Due to the persistent infection and necrosis in the collections, an esophageal fully covered self-expanding metal stent was temporarily inserted through the percutaneous fistula in order to increase the caliber of the fistula and to perform PEN. Discussion: The step-up approach suggests endoscopic or percutaneous drainage of infected WON as the first interventional method, depending on the location of the WON and the local expertise [1]. PEN is a safe and effective alternative to surgical treatment with a technical success rate of 47-93% and a complication rate of no more than 20% [4]. Conclusion: PEN is an advanced endoscopic technique that is showing promising results but still needs randomized controlled trials to establish safety and efficacy.
经皮内镜坏死性坏死切除术治疗ercp后胰腺炎
简介:急性胰腺炎是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)患者最常见的并发症,发生率为3.5-9.7%[1]。其中5-10%发展为急性坏死性胰腺炎,75-80%可发生胰腺或胰腺周围病变[2]。我们报道了一例经皮内镜下坏死切除术(PEN)治疗ercp后急性坏死性胰腺炎伴壁闭塞性坏死(WON)的病例[3]。病例报告:60岁男性梗阻性黄疸和胆总管结石在腹部CT扫描行ERCP清除胆道。在接下来的几天里,由于发生了严重的急性胰腺炎和脓毒症,他重复了腹部CT扫描,发现胰腺周围有多发坏死集合,并延伸到盆腔结肠旁沟。在逐步采取措施后,开始了靶向抗生素治疗。四周后,由于胃或十二指肠距离WON较远,无法进行超声内镜引导引流。然后通过患者左侧腹部经皮置管引流,每天用双氧水冲洗。由于收集物的持续感染和坏死,为了增加瘘口的口径并进行PEN,我们暂时通过经皮瘘置入食管全覆盖自膨胀金属支架。讨论:根据WON的位置和当地的专业知识,建议将内镜或经皮引流感染WON作为第一介入方法[1]。PEN是一种安全有效的手术治疗替代方法,技术成功率为47-93%,并发症发生率不超过20%[4]。结论:PEN是一种先进的内窥镜技术,显示出良好的效果,但仍需要随机对照试验来确定安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信