‘We Are All in This Together’. Collective Bonuses and Incentives in the United Kingdom and Europe: The Real Performance-Related Pay?

Duncan Brown
{"title":"‘We Are All in This Together’. Collective Bonuses and Incentives in the United Kingdom and Europe: The Real Performance-Related Pay?","authors":"Duncan Brown","doi":"10.1177/0886368720947328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘We are all in this together’ has been a common leadership cry during the coronavirus crisis. But do their rewards designs generally reinforce collective performance? Why have collective bonus and incentive plans made little headway in Europe and what is the evidence on their effectiveness? The author presents findings from a bonus and incentive research review carried out for a major oil company. He found two-thirds of companies operate variable pay plans, with three-quarters of them based on individual performance. Collective plans are, however, spreading in incidence. The research literature he found replicates the North American evidence, indicating collective schemes are associated with higher performance across a variety of metrics. But they are not universally successful. Risks include diminishing effectiveness over time and lack of employee understanding. The research highlights success depends on tailoring to suit the culture and using a range of high-performance work practices. The author concludes success is more likely where collective plans are viewed ‘not just as a vehicle for disseminating incentives but for imparting a sense of shared ownership’.","PeriodicalId":79838,"journal":{"name":"Compensation and benefits review","volume":"19 1","pages":"175 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compensation and benefits review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368720947328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

‘We are all in this together’ has been a common leadership cry during the coronavirus crisis. But do their rewards designs generally reinforce collective performance? Why have collective bonus and incentive plans made little headway in Europe and what is the evidence on their effectiveness? The author presents findings from a bonus and incentive research review carried out for a major oil company. He found two-thirds of companies operate variable pay plans, with three-quarters of them based on individual performance. Collective plans are, however, spreading in incidence. The research literature he found replicates the North American evidence, indicating collective schemes are associated with higher performance across a variety of metrics. But they are not universally successful. Risks include diminishing effectiveness over time and lack of employee understanding. The research highlights success depends on tailoring to suit the culture and using a range of high-performance work practices. The author concludes success is more likely where collective plans are viewed ‘not just as a vehicle for disseminating incentives but for imparting a sense of shared ownership’.
“我们都在这条船上”。英国和欧洲的集体奖金和激励:真正的绩效薪酬?
“我们在一起”是冠状病毒危机期间领导人的共同口号。但他们的奖励设计是否能普遍强化集体绩效?为什么集体奖金和激励计划在欧洲进展甚微?证明其有效性的证据是什么?作者介绍了对一家大型石油公司进行的奖金和激励研究综述的结果。他发现,三分之二的公司实行可变薪酬计划,其中四分之三基于个人表现。然而,集体计划的发生率正在上升。他发现的研究文献复制了北美的证据,表明集体计划与各种指标的更高绩效有关。但它们并非普遍成功。风险包括效率随着时间的推移而降低,以及员工缺乏理解。该研究强调,成功取决于根据企业文化进行调整,并采用一系列高效的工作实践。作者得出结论,如果集体计划“不仅被视为传播激励的工具,而且被视为传授共同所有权意识的工具”,那么成功的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信