Visual marker detection and decoding in AR systems: a comparative study

Xiang Zhang, S. Fronz, Nassir Navab
{"title":"Visual marker detection and decoding in AR systems: a comparative study","authors":"Xiang Zhang, S. Fronz, Nassir Navab","doi":"10.1109/ISMAR.2002.1115078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual markers are widely used in existing augmented reality (AR) applications. In most of such applications, the performance of an AR system depends highly on the tracking system for visual marker detection, tracking, and pose estimation. Currently, there are more than one marker based tracking/calibration systems available. It is thus desirable for the user to know which marker tracking system is likely to perform the best for a specific AR application. For this purpose, we compare several marker systems all using planar square coded visual markers. We present the evaluation results, both qualitatively and quantitatively, for the usability, efficiency, accuracy, and reliability. For a particular AR application, there are different marker detection and tracking requirements. Therefore, the purpose of this work is not to rank existing marker systems; instead, we try to analyze the strength and weakness of various aspects of the marker tracking systems and provide AR application developers with this information.","PeriodicalId":92225,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"258","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality : (ISMAR) [proceedings]. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2002.1115078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 258

Abstract

Visual markers are widely used in existing augmented reality (AR) applications. In most of such applications, the performance of an AR system depends highly on the tracking system for visual marker detection, tracking, and pose estimation. Currently, there are more than one marker based tracking/calibration systems available. It is thus desirable for the user to know which marker tracking system is likely to perform the best for a specific AR application. For this purpose, we compare several marker systems all using planar square coded visual markers. We present the evaluation results, both qualitatively and quantitatively, for the usability, efficiency, accuracy, and reliability. For a particular AR application, there are different marker detection and tracking requirements. Therefore, the purpose of this work is not to rank existing marker systems; instead, we try to analyze the strength and weakness of various aspects of the marker tracking systems and provide AR application developers with this information.
AR系统中视觉标记检测与解码的比较研究
视觉标记广泛应用于现有的增强现实(AR)应用中。在大多数这样的应用中,AR系统的性能高度依赖于视觉标记检测、跟踪和姿态估计的跟踪系统。目前,有多个基于标记的跟踪/校准系统可用。因此,用户需要知道哪个标记跟踪系统可能对特定的AR应用程序执行得最好。为此,我们比较了几种使用平面方形编码视觉标记的标记系统。我们给出了可用性、效率、准确性和可靠性的定性和定量评估结果。对于特定的AR应用程序,有不同的标记检测和跟踪需求。因此,这项工作的目的不是对现有的评分系统进行排名;相反,我们试图分析标记跟踪系统的各个方面的优缺点,并为AR应用程序开发人员提供这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信