The need for art: The outlines of individuality in the flood of images

Lamija Neimarlija
{"title":"The need for art: The outlines of individuality in the flood of images","authors":"Lamija Neimarlija","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2210099n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presented in this paper begins from the time of turmoil in the field of arts and thinking (about art) in the late 19th and early 20th century. The shift from traditional techniques and operational procedures to modern ones, which is followed back from the time of industrial revolution, contributed to the elimination of art as the relevant operational procedure and consequently to the elimination of the values on which the traditional art survived. Although modern art drew its inspiration from the well of resistance to tradition and social reality in which the masses played an important role, the paper attempts to follow the task the art has inherited from earlier times - the artistic display of sense at the level of image, which differentiates it in the recent cultural, economic and intellectual conditions from the mass industrial production of consumable images. The paper examines the possibility of differentiation of artistic image in postmodern period, at the time of excessive expansion of mass media and electronic simulation techniques, following the realisation that the modernist ideal of progress and the exclusivity of art are unviable. The paper presents the arguments of the philosophers who deny the possibility of art in postmodern era. Contrary to that, it indicates that there is a vast area of artistic production which testifies with its exquisite experiential and cognitive value in the field of image to the need for artistic mimesis and its articulation of reality at the time of simulation.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2210099n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research presented in this paper begins from the time of turmoil in the field of arts and thinking (about art) in the late 19th and early 20th century. The shift from traditional techniques and operational procedures to modern ones, which is followed back from the time of industrial revolution, contributed to the elimination of art as the relevant operational procedure and consequently to the elimination of the values on which the traditional art survived. Although modern art drew its inspiration from the well of resistance to tradition and social reality in which the masses played an important role, the paper attempts to follow the task the art has inherited from earlier times - the artistic display of sense at the level of image, which differentiates it in the recent cultural, economic and intellectual conditions from the mass industrial production of consumable images. The paper examines the possibility of differentiation of artistic image in postmodern period, at the time of excessive expansion of mass media and electronic simulation techniques, following the realisation that the modernist ideal of progress and the exclusivity of art are unviable. The paper presents the arguments of the philosophers who deny the possibility of art in postmodern era. Contrary to that, it indicates that there is a vast area of artistic production which testifies with its exquisite experiential and cognitive value in the field of image to the need for artistic mimesis and its articulation of reality at the time of simulation.
对艺术的需要:图像洪流中个性的轮廓
本文的研究从19世纪末和20世纪初艺术领域和思想(关于艺术)的动荡时期开始。从工业革命时期开始,从传统技术和操作程序向现代技术和操作程序的转变,导致了艺术作为相关操作程序的消失,从而导致了传统艺术赖以生存的价值的消失。虽然现代艺术的灵感来自于对传统和社会现实的反抗,而大众在其中扮演了重要的角色,但本文试图遵循艺术从早期继承的任务——在图像层面上的感觉的艺术表现,这在最近的文化、经济和智力条件下将其与可消费图像的大规模工业生产区分开来。本文考察了后现代时期艺术形象分化的可能性,在大众传媒和电子模拟技术过度扩张的时代,在意识到现代主义的进步理想和艺术的排他性是不可持续的之后。本文介绍了后现代时期否认艺术可能性的哲学家们的论点。与此相反,它表明,有一个广阔的艺术生产领域,以其在图像领域中精湛的经验和认知价值,证明了艺术模仿的需要及其在模拟时对现实的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信