Gendered Experiments: Beyond the Realist/Experimental Divide

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nonia Williams
{"title":"Gendered Experiments: Beyond the Realist/Experimental Divide","authors":"Nonia Williams","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2022.2021029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carole Sweeney’s Vagabond Fictions; Gender and Experiment in British Women’s Writing, 1945–1970 is a highly engaging and convincing work of feminist critical recovery. Her focus is five of the most interesting mid-century female ‘British’ experimental writers: Anna Kavan, Brigid Brophy, Christine Brooke-Rose, Eva Figes and Ann Quin. Sweeney shows how the work of these writers is experimental in both content and form, and in this, how ‘Gender and Experiment’ are inextricably bound up. Sweeney brilliantly and wittily articulates this in terms of ‘aesthetic and thematic vagabondage’ (6), the latter of which ‘exhibits a movement away from domestic space, or shows it to be creatively and intellectually limiting for women, and into states of transit, transformation and displacement’ (2). At the same time, Sweeney is careful to avoid connecting femininity and experimentation in a way that ends up essentialising both. In this, Vagabond Fictions deliberately diverges from the argument made in Friedman and Fuch’s Breaking the Sequence, which equates realism with patriarchal structures and pits female writers’ experimentation against this. While Sweeney finds the concept of the ‘alternative fictional space’ (22) of women’s experimental writing useful, she rejects the earlier book’s realism/experimentalism and patriarchal/feminist oppositions. She reconsiders and rejects the so-called return to realism in writing post world war two; instead, Sweeney argues—and here her work contributes to the much needed deconstruction of the realist/experimental divide— the era is characterised by malleable and blurred boundaries between realist and experimental writing. Carole Sweeney, Vagabond Fictions: Gender and Experiment in British Women’s Writing, 19451970, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2020, 304 pp., HB 9781474426176","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"167 1","pages":"149 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2021029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carole Sweeney’s Vagabond Fictions; Gender and Experiment in British Women’s Writing, 1945–1970 is a highly engaging and convincing work of feminist critical recovery. Her focus is five of the most interesting mid-century female ‘British’ experimental writers: Anna Kavan, Brigid Brophy, Christine Brooke-Rose, Eva Figes and Ann Quin. Sweeney shows how the work of these writers is experimental in both content and form, and in this, how ‘Gender and Experiment’ are inextricably bound up. Sweeney brilliantly and wittily articulates this in terms of ‘aesthetic and thematic vagabondage’ (6), the latter of which ‘exhibits a movement away from domestic space, or shows it to be creatively and intellectually limiting for women, and into states of transit, transformation and displacement’ (2). At the same time, Sweeney is careful to avoid connecting femininity and experimentation in a way that ends up essentialising both. In this, Vagabond Fictions deliberately diverges from the argument made in Friedman and Fuch’s Breaking the Sequence, which equates realism with patriarchal structures and pits female writers’ experimentation against this. While Sweeney finds the concept of the ‘alternative fictional space’ (22) of women’s experimental writing useful, she rejects the earlier book’s realism/experimentalism and patriarchal/feminist oppositions. She reconsiders and rejects the so-called return to realism in writing post world war two; instead, Sweeney argues—and here her work contributes to the much needed deconstruction of the realist/experimental divide— the era is characterised by malleable and blurred boundaries between realist and experimental writing. Carole Sweeney, Vagabond Fictions: Gender and Experiment in British Women’s Writing, 19451970, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2020, 304 pp., HB 9781474426176
性别实验:超越现实主义/实验的鸿沟
卡罗尔·斯威尼的流浪小说;《1945-1970年英国女性写作中的性别与实验》是一部引人入胜、令人信服的女权主义批评复兴作品。她关注的是本世纪中叶最有趣的五位“英国”女性实验作家:安娜·卡万、布里吉德·布罗菲、克里斯汀·布鲁克-罗斯、伊娃·菲格斯和安·奎因。斯威尼展示了这些作家的作品在内容和形式上都是实验性的,在这一点上,“性别和实验”是如何密不可分的。斯威尼用“美学和主题的流浪”(6)巧妙地表达了这一点,后者“展示了一种远离家庭空间的运动,或者显示了它对女性的创造性和智力限制,并进入了过渡、转变和流离失所的状态”(2)。与此同时,斯威尼小心翼翼地避免将女性气质和实验联系起来,以一种最终将两者本质化的方式。在这一点上,《流浪小说》有意偏离了弗里德曼和富赫在《打破顺序》一书中提出的观点,后者将现实主义与父权结构等同起来,并将女性作家的实验与之对立起来。虽然斯威尼发现女性实验写作的“另类虚构空间”(22)的概念很有用,但她拒绝了早期书中现实主义/实验主义和父权/女权主义的对立。她重新思考并拒绝了二战后写作中所谓的回归现实主义;相反,斯威尼认为,这个时代的特点是现实主义和实验写作之间的界限具有可塑性和模糊性。在这里,她的作品有助于解构现实主义/实验主义的鸿沟。卡罗尔·斯威尼,《流浪小说:英国女性写作中的性别与实验》,1945年至1970年,爱丁堡,爱丁堡大学出版社,2020年,304页,HB 9781474426176
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women-A Cultural Review
Women-A Cultural Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信