{"title":"Death and Violence in Contemporary Theatre, Drama, and Novel (Oliver Frljić, Anja Hilling, Simona Semenič, and G. W. Sebald)","authors":"Tomaž Toporišič","doi":"10.2478/mik-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary For the purpose of my examination of how literature and art take part in the circulation of significations and representations in the construction of social reality, I concentrate on a specific feature that links and unites the work of four contemporary European authors—the inflation of death and violence, or the “overflow of corpses” in their novels, plays, and performances. My first example will be Bosnian-Croatian theatre director Oliver Frljić, his disturbing, shocking performances in which he uses his own personal, wartime, and political traumas to ask universal questions about the boundaries of artistic and social freedom, individual and collective responsibility, tolerance and stereotypes. As the second and third example I will take plays by two (no longer) dramatic writers, Anja Hilling and Simona Semenič—two outstanding representatives of German and Slovene (no longer) dramatic theatre and drama, exploring in their texts a tension between repetition and representation in which the first mechanism undermines and challenges the second and produces a specific poetic or aesthetic device—an effect of ostranenie or defamiliarisation (Shklovsky). The third example will consist of the novels by Winfried Georg Sebald, in which the German author uses the device of his wanderings between signs, punctuated by black and white photographs, producing a specific emblematic of a mutation of space and time, in which history and geography cross-fertilise, tracing out paths and weaving networks. Besides examining the contestation of subject positions, I concentrate on the dialectics of art and society, where fluid, uncontainable subjects are constantly pushing the contours. Revising the critical consensus that contemporary art primarily engages with the real, the essay describes how theatre and fiction today navigate the complexities of the discourse as well as social realities; how the discussed artists all share the belief that creative expression must also be destruction. Art has to go beyond what we are and what we can identify through understanding. Thus, art negotiates, inflects discursive circulation of stories, idioms, controversies, testimonies, and pieces of (mis)information in the face of global uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":36225,"journal":{"name":"Art History and Criticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Summary For the purpose of my examination of how literature and art take part in the circulation of significations and representations in the construction of social reality, I concentrate on a specific feature that links and unites the work of four contemporary European authors—the inflation of death and violence, or the “overflow of corpses” in their novels, plays, and performances. My first example will be Bosnian-Croatian theatre director Oliver Frljić, his disturbing, shocking performances in which he uses his own personal, wartime, and political traumas to ask universal questions about the boundaries of artistic and social freedom, individual and collective responsibility, tolerance and stereotypes. As the second and third example I will take plays by two (no longer) dramatic writers, Anja Hilling and Simona Semenič—two outstanding representatives of German and Slovene (no longer) dramatic theatre and drama, exploring in their texts a tension between repetition and representation in which the first mechanism undermines and challenges the second and produces a specific poetic or aesthetic device—an effect of ostranenie or defamiliarisation (Shklovsky). The third example will consist of the novels by Winfried Georg Sebald, in which the German author uses the device of his wanderings between signs, punctuated by black and white photographs, producing a specific emblematic of a mutation of space and time, in which history and geography cross-fertilise, tracing out paths and weaving networks. Besides examining the contestation of subject positions, I concentrate on the dialectics of art and society, where fluid, uncontainable subjects are constantly pushing the contours. Revising the critical consensus that contemporary art primarily engages with the real, the essay describes how theatre and fiction today navigate the complexities of the discourse as well as social realities; how the discussed artists all share the belief that creative expression must also be destruction. Art has to go beyond what we are and what we can identify through understanding. Thus, art negotiates, inflects discursive circulation of stories, idioms, controversies, testimonies, and pieces of (mis)information in the face of global uncertainties.
为了研究文学和艺术如何参与社会现实建构中意义和表征的循环,我集中研究了四位当代欧洲作家作品的一个特定特征——死亡和暴力的膨胀,或者他们的小说、戏剧和表演中的“尸体泛滥”。我的第一个例子是波斯尼亚-克罗地亚戏剧导演奥利弗·弗莱季奇(Oliver frljiki),他的表演令人不安,令人震惊,他利用自己的个人、战争和政治创伤,提出了关于艺术和社会自由、个人和集体责任、宽容和刻板印象的边界的普遍问题。作为第二个和第三个例子,我将以两位(不再)戏剧作家的戏剧为例,安雅·希林和西蒙娜·塞门伊——德国和斯洛文尼亚(不再)戏剧戏剧和戏剧的两位杰出代表,在他们的文本中探索重复和再现之间的紧张关系,其中第一种机制破坏和挑战第二种机制,并产生一种特定的诗歌或美学手段——一种ostranenie或陌陌感的效果(什克洛夫斯基)。第三个例子是Winfried Georg Sebald的小说,在他的小说中,这位德国作家使用了他在标志之间徘徊的手法,用黑白照片点缀,产生了空间和时间突变的具体象征,其中历史和地理相互交融,追踪路径并编织网络。除了研究主体立场的争论,我还专注于艺术与社会的辩证法,其中流动的、不可遏制的主体不断地推动着轮廓。这篇文章修正了当代艺术主要与现实接触的批判性共识,描述了戏剧和小说今天如何驾驭话语和社会现实的复杂性;讨论的艺术家们都有一个共同的信念,那就是创造性的表达也必须是毁灭。艺术必须超越我们的本质,超越我们通过理解所能认同的东西。因此,面对全球的不确定性,艺术协商、影响故事、习语、争议、证词和(错误)信息的话语循环。