A Semantic Retrieval System for Case Law

IF 0.5 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
E. P. Ebietomere, G. Ekuobase
{"title":"A Semantic Retrieval System for Case Law","authors":"E. P. Ebietomere, G. Ekuobase","doi":"10.2478/acss-2019-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Legal reasoning, the core of legal practice in many countries, is “stare decisis” and its soundness is usually strengthened by relevant case law consulted. However, the task of relevant case law access and retrieval is tiring to legal practitioners and constitutes a serious drain on their productivity. Existing efforts at addressing this problem are conceptional, restrictive or unreliable. Specifically, existing semantic retrieval (SR) systems for case law are desirous of exceptional retrieval precision. Ontology promises to meet this desire, if introduced to the SR system. As a consequence, an ontology-based SR system for case law has been built using the systems analysis and design methodology. In particular, the component-based software engineering and the agile methodologies are employed to implement the system. Finally, the search and retrieval performance of the resultant SR system has been evaluated using the heuristics evaluation method. The retrieval system has shown to have a search and retrieval performance of about 94 % precision, 80 % recall and 84 % F-measure. Overall, the paper implements the SR system for case law with excellent precision and affirms the superiority of ontology approach over other semantic approaches to SR systems for document retrieval in the legal domain.","PeriodicalId":41960,"journal":{"name":"Applied Computer Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2019-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Legal reasoning, the core of legal practice in many countries, is “stare decisis” and its soundness is usually strengthened by relevant case law consulted. However, the task of relevant case law access and retrieval is tiring to legal practitioners and constitutes a serious drain on their productivity. Existing efforts at addressing this problem are conceptional, restrictive or unreliable. Specifically, existing semantic retrieval (SR) systems for case law are desirous of exceptional retrieval precision. Ontology promises to meet this desire, if introduced to the SR system. As a consequence, an ontology-based SR system for case law has been built using the systems analysis and design methodology. In particular, the component-based software engineering and the agile methodologies are employed to implement the system. Finally, the search and retrieval performance of the resultant SR system has been evaluated using the heuristics evaluation method. The retrieval system has shown to have a search and retrieval performance of about 94 % precision, 80 % recall and 84 % F-measure. Overall, the paper implements the SR system for case law with excellent precision and affirms the superiority of ontology approach over other semantic approaches to SR systems for document retrieval in the legal domain.
判例法语义检索系统
摘要法律推理是许多国家法律实践的核心,其合理性通常通过查阅相关判例法来加强。然而,相关判例法的获取和检索工作对法律从业人员来说是一项繁重的任务,严重消耗了他们的生产力。解决这一问题的现有努力是概念性的、限制性的或不可靠的。具体而言,现有的判例法语义检索(SR)系统对检索精度的要求很高。如果将本体引入到SR系统中,则有望满足这一愿望。因此,使用系统分析和设计方法构建了基于本体的判例法SR系统。特别地,采用了基于组件的软件工程和敏捷方法来实现该系统。最后,利用启发式评价方法对合成的SR系统的搜索和检索性能进行了评价。该检索系统的检索精度为94%,查全率为80%,F-measure为84%。总体而言,本文以优异的精度实现了判例法检索系统,并肯定了本体方法相对于其他语义方法在法律领域文档检索检索系统中的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Computer Systems
Applied Computer Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信