Endovascular Occlusion Balloon for Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Tears During Transvenous Lead Extraction.

R. Azarrafiy, D. Tsang, B. Wilkoff, R. Carrillo
{"title":"Endovascular Occlusion Balloon for Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Tears During Transvenous Lead Extraction.","authors":"R. Azarrafiy, D. Tsang, B. Wilkoff, R. Carrillo","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSuperior vena cava (SVC) tears are one of the most lethal complications in transvenous lead extraction. An endovascular balloon can occlude the SVC in the event of a laceration, preventing blood loss and offering a more controlled surgical field for repair. An early study demonstrated that proper use of this device is associated with reduced mortality. Thereafter, high-volume extractors at the Eleventh Annual Lead Management Symposium developed a best practice protocol for the endovascular balloon.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe collected data on adverse events in lead extraction from July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. Data were prospectively collected from both a US Food and Drug Administration-maintained database and physician reports of adverse events as they occurred. We gathered case details directly from extracting physicians. Confirmed SVC tears were analyzed for patient demographics, case details, and index hospitalization mortality.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018, 116 confirmed SVC events were identified, of which 44.0% involved proper balloon use and 56.0% involved no use or improper use. When an endovascular balloon was properly used, 45 of 51 patients (88.2%) survived in comparison to 37 of 65 patients (56.9%) when a balloon was not used or improperly used (P=0.0002). Furthermore, multivariate regression modeling found that proper balloon deployment was an independent, negative predictor of in-hospital mortality for patients who experienced an SVC laceration (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.40; P<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFrom July 1, 2016, through July 31, 2018, patients undergoing lead extraction were more likely to survive SVC tears when treatment included an endovascular balloon.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

BACKGROUND Superior vena cava (SVC) tears are one of the most lethal complications in transvenous lead extraction. An endovascular balloon can occlude the SVC in the event of a laceration, preventing blood loss and offering a more controlled surgical field for repair. An early study demonstrated that proper use of this device is associated with reduced mortality. Thereafter, high-volume extractors at the Eleventh Annual Lead Management Symposium developed a best practice protocol for the endovascular balloon. METHODS We collected data on adverse events in lead extraction from July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. Data were prospectively collected from both a US Food and Drug Administration-maintained database and physician reports of adverse events as they occurred. We gathered case details directly from extracting physicians. Confirmed SVC tears were analyzed for patient demographics, case details, and index hospitalization mortality. RESULTS From July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018, 116 confirmed SVC events were identified, of which 44.0% involved proper balloon use and 56.0% involved no use or improper use. When an endovascular balloon was properly used, 45 of 51 patients (88.2%) survived in comparison to 37 of 65 patients (56.9%) when a balloon was not used or improperly used (P=0.0002). Furthermore, multivariate regression modeling found that proper balloon deployment was an independent, negative predictor of in-hospital mortality for patients who experienced an SVC laceration (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS From July 1, 2016, through July 31, 2018, patients undergoing lead extraction were more likely to survive SVC tears when treatment included an endovascular balloon.
血管内封堵球囊治疗经静脉拔铅时上腔静脉撕裂。
背景:上腔静脉(SVC)撕裂是经静脉铅提取术中最致命的并发症之一。在发生撕裂伤时,血管内球囊可以阻塞SVC,防止失血,并为修复提供更可控的手术区域。一项早期研究表明,正确使用这种装置与降低死亡率有关。此后,在第十一届年度铅管理研讨会上,大容量提取器制定了血管内球囊的最佳实践方案。方法收集2016年7月1日至2018年7月31日期间拔铅不良事件的数据。前瞻性地从美国食品和药物管理局维护的数据库和发生不良事件时的医生报告中收集数据。我们直接从抽取的医生那里收集病例细节。对确诊的SVC撕裂进行患者人口统计学、病例细节和住院死亡率指数分析。结果2016年7月1日至2018年7月31日,共发现116例SVC确诊事件,其中44.0%涉及正确使用球囊,56.0%涉及未使用或不正确使用球囊。当正确使用血管内球囊时,51例患者中有45例(88.2%)存活,而未使用或不正确使用球囊时,65例患者中有37例(56.9%)存活(P=0.0002)。此外,多变量回归模型发现,正确的球囊部署是SVC撕裂伤患者住院死亡率的独立负向预测因子(优势比,0.13;95% ci, 0.04-0.40;P < 0.001)。结论从2016年7月1日至2018年7月31日,接受铅提取的患者在接受血管内球囊治疗时更有可能存活于SVC撕裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信