The indonesian government strategy of herd immunity in handling of pandemic COVID 19

Andi Azikin, Baharuddin Thahir, Andi Masrich, S. Zulaika, Jatnika Dwi Asri, Anya Risnawati Soerya Putri, Etin Indrayani, Y. Cahyono, Djuhrijjani, Fitriani, Intan Rachmina Koho, Asri Setiani
{"title":"The indonesian government strategy of herd immunity in handling of pandemic COVID 19","authors":"Andi Azikin, Baharuddin Thahir, Andi Masrich, S. Zulaika, Jatnika Dwi Asri, Anya Risnawati Soerya Putri, Etin Indrayani, Y. Cahyono, Djuhrijjani, Fitriani, Intan Rachmina Koho, Asri Setiani","doi":"10.31838/SRP.2021.1.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The health protocol in the PSBB policy has become less effective in preventing the spread of the COVID 19 virus because human transactions and activities (as a medium for the spread of the COVID 19 virus) in public spaces still occur, with various spreads through various transmissions, either by direct contact, droplet or airborne. The 3 M health protocol (Wearing a mask, maintaining distance and washing hands), cannot guarantee that the health protocol can run within 24 hours perfectly, as a result the spread of the COVID virus is getting more massive, both in offices, schools / pesantren, markets / spending centers even within the family environment there are clusters of the spread of the COVID virus. This can be seen from the large number of mass gatherings that have occurred, both religious activities, election processes etc, even according to the COVID 19 task force Doni Monardo explained that from March to December 2020 tens of thousands who came from various countries to Indonesia, 2,800 confirmed positive people for COVID 19. The correct handling of COVID 19 should be the Karangtina area (Lockdown) as mandated by Law No. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, because there is no social interaction or community activity in public spaces, and the government guarantees the basic needs of the community for free, but why does the government not adopt a regional quarantine policy.","PeriodicalId":22121,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31838/SRP.2021.1.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The health protocol in the PSBB policy has become less effective in preventing the spread of the COVID 19 virus because human transactions and activities (as a medium for the spread of the COVID 19 virus) in public spaces still occur, with various spreads through various transmissions, either by direct contact, droplet or airborne. The 3 M health protocol (Wearing a mask, maintaining distance and washing hands), cannot guarantee that the health protocol can run within 24 hours perfectly, as a result the spread of the COVID virus is getting more massive, both in offices, schools / pesantren, markets / spending centers even within the family environment there are clusters of the spread of the COVID virus. This can be seen from the large number of mass gatherings that have occurred, both religious activities, election processes etc, even according to the COVID 19 task force Doni Monardo explained that from March to December 2020 tens of thousands who came from various countries to Indonesia, 2,800 confirmed positive people for COVID 19. The correct handling of COVID 19 should be the Karangtina area (Lockdown) as mandated by Law No. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, because there is no social interaction or community activity in public spaces, and the government guarantees the basic needs of the community for free, but why does the government not adopt a regional quarantine policy.
印度尼西亚政府在应对COVID - 19大流行中的群体免疫战略
由于公共场所的人类交易和活动(作为COVID - 19病毒传播的媒介)仍然存在,通过直接接触、飞沫或空气传播的各种传播方式进行各种传播,因此PSBB政策中的卫生协议在防止COVID - 19病毒传播方面的效果有所降低。3m卫生协议(戴口罩、保持距离和洗手)不能保证卫生协议在24小时内完美运行,因此COVID病毒的传播越来越大规模,无论是在办公室、学校/商店、市场/消费中心,甚至在家庭环境中都有COVID病毒传播的聚集性。这可以从发生的大量群众集会中看出,包括宗教活动,选举过程等,甚至根据COVID - 19特别工作组,Doni Monardo解释说,从2020年3月到12月,来自各国的数万人来到印度尼西亚,有2,800人被确诊为COVID - 19阳性。正确的应对方式应该是《2018年卫生检疫法》第6号规定的“卡朗格蒂纳地区(封锁)”,因为公共场所没有社会交往和社区活动,政府免费保障社区的基本需求,但为什么不采取地区隔离政策?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信