Blastocyst Prediction of Day-3 Cleavage-Stage Embryos Using Machine Learning

Dung P. Nguyen, Q. T. Pham, Thanh L. Tran, L. Vuong, T. Ho
{"title":"Blastocyst Prediction of Day-3 Cleavage-Stage Embryos Using Machine Learning","authors":"Dung P. Nguyen, Q. T. Pham, Thanh L. Tran, L. Vuong, T. Ho","doi":"10.1142/s266131822150016x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Embryo selection plays an important role in the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, morphological embryo assessment has a number of limitations, including the time required, lack of accuracy, and inconsistency. This study determined whether a machine learning-based model could predict blastocyst formation using day-3 embryo images. Methods:Day-3 embryo images from IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles performed at My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital between August 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to inform model development. Day-3 embryo images derived from two-pronuclear (2PN) zygotes with known blastocyst formation data were extracted from the CCM-iBIS time-lapse incubator (Astec, Japan) at 67 hours post ICSI, and labeled as blastocyst/non-blastocyst based on results at 116 hours post ICSI. Images were used as the input dataset to train (85%) and validate (15%) the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, then model accuracy was determined using the training and validation dataset. The performance of 13 experienced embryologists for predicting blastocyst formation based on 100 day-3 embryo images was also evaluated. Results:A total of 1,135 images were allocated into training ([Formula: see text] = 967) and validation ([Formula: see text] = 168) sets, with an even distribution for blastocyst formation outcome. The accuracy of the final model for blastocyst formation was 97.72% in the training dataset and 76.19% in the validation dataset. The final model predicted blastocyst formation from day-3 embryo images in the validation dataset with an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.81). Embryologists predicted blastocyst formation with the accuracy of 70.07% (95% CI 68.12%–72.03%), sensitivity of 87.04% (95% CI 82.56%–91.52%), and specificity of 30.93% (95% CI 29.35%–32.51%). Conclusions:The CNN-based machine learning model using day-3 embryo images predicted blastocyst formation more accurately than experienced embryologists. The CNN-based model is a potential tool to predict additional IVF outcomes.","PeriodicalId":34382,"journal":{"name":"Fertility Reproduction","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s266131822150016x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background:Embryo selection plays an important role in the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, morphological embryo assessment has a number of limitations, including the time required, lack of accuracy, and inconsistency. This study determined whether a machine learning-based model could predict blastocyst formation using day-3 embryo images. Methods:Day-3 embryo images from IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles performed at My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital between August 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to inform model development. Day-3 embryo images derived from two-pronuclear (2PN) zygotes with known blastocyst formation data were extracted from the CCM-iBIS time-lapse incubator (Astec, Japan) at 67 hours post ICSI, and labeled as blastocyst/non-blastocyst based on results at 116 hours post ICSI. Images were used as the input dataset to train (85%) and validate (15%) the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, then model accuracy was determined using the training and validation dataset. The performance of 13 experienced embryologists for predicting blastocyst formation based on 100 day-3 embryo images was also evaluated. Results:A total of 1,135 images were allocated into training ([Formula: see text] = 967) and validation ([Formula: see text] = 168) sets, with an even distribution for blastocyst formation outcome. The accuracy of the final model for blastocyst formation was 97.72% in the training dataset and 76.19% in the validation dataset. The final model predicted blastocyst formation from day-3 embryo images in the validation dataset with an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.81). Embryologists predicted blastocyst formation with the accuracy of 70.07% (95% CI 68.12%–72.03%), sensitivity of 87.04% (95% CI 82.56%–91.52%), and specificity of 30.93% (95% CI 29.35%–32.51%). Conclusions:The CNN-based machine learning model using day-3 embryo images predicted blastocyst formation more accurately than experienced embryologists. The CNN-based model is a potential tool to predict additional IVF outcomes.
利用机器学习预测第3天卵裂期胚胎的囊胚
背景:胚胎选择对体外受精(IVF)的成功起着重要作用。然而,形态学胚胎评估有许多局限性,包括所需的时间,缺乏准确性和不一致。这项研究确定了基于机器学习的模型是否可以使用第3天的胚胎图像预测囊胚形成。方法:回顾性分析2018年8月至2019年6月在美德府南医院进行的IVF/胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期的第3天胚胎图像,为模型开发提供信息。在ICSI后67小时,从CCM-iBIS定时培养箱(Astec,日本)中提取具有已知囊胚形成数据的双原核(2PN)受精卵的第3天胚胎图像,并根据ICSI后116小时的结果标记为囊胚/非囊胚。使用图像作为输入数据集对卷积神经网络(CNN)模型进行训练(85%)和验证(15%),然后使用训练和验证数据集确定模型的精度。13名经验丰富的胚胎学家根据100天的胚胎图像预测囊胚形成的表现也进行了评估。结果:共有1135张图像被分配到训练集([公式:见文]= 967)和验证集([公式:见文]= 168),囊胚形成结果分布均匀。最终的囊胚形成模型在训练数据集中的准确率为97.72%,在验证数据集中的准确率为76.19%。最终模型根据验证数据集中第3天的胚胎图像预测囊胚形成,曲线下面积为0.75(95%置信区间[CI] 0.69-0.81)。胚胎学家预测囊胚形成的准确率为70.07% (95% CI 68.12% ~ 72.03%),敏感性为87.04% (95% CI 82.56% ~ 91.52%),特异性为30.93% (95% CI 29.35% ~ 32.51%)。结论:使用第3天胚胎图像的基于cnn的机器学习模型比经验丰富的胚胎学家更准确地预测囊胚形成。基于cnn的模型是预测其他试管婴儿结果的潜在工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信