Multiple Representation-Based Blended Learning Model for Chemistry Learning in High School

S. Mulyani, Elvi Susanti VH, S. Ariani, S. B. Utomo, Rachma Kharolinasari, Maria Yuliana Panie
{"title":"Multiple Representation-Based Blended Learning Model for Chemistry Learning in High School","authors":"S. Mulyani, Elvi Susanti VH, S. Ariani, S. B. Utomo, Rachma Kharolinasari, Maria Yuliana Panie","doi":"10.20961/paedagogia.v25i1.56298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak presents new challenges and opportunities for teachers and students. The Blended Learning method is reported to be one of the promising alternatives. However, no specific study revealed the proper blended learning model for chemistry learning that require chemistry representation and can improve critical thinking and problem solving skills at high school level. Qualitative research using phenomenological methods was used in this study. The data collection technique used is using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. A total of 22 respondents from master students of chemistry education, lecturers and teachers of chemistry education participated in this study. The blended learning model analyzed in this study are Rotational blended learning models (station class, Lab/Whole Group class, flipped class, and Individual), Flex, Self-Blend, and Enriched-Virtual classes. The study results indicate that the blended learning model that the respondents chose the most suitable for multiple representation-based chemistry learning was the Flipped Class model (50%), while the one that was not selected was the Individual Rotation model.","PeriodicalId":52686,"journal":{"name":"Paedagogia Christiana","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paedagogia Christiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i1.56298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak presents new challenges and opportunities for teachers and students. The Blended Learning method is reported to be one of the promising alternatives. However, no specific study revealed the proper blended learning model for chemistry learning that require chemistry representation and can improve critical thinking and problem solving skills at high school level. Qualitative research using phenomenological methods was used in this study. The data collection technique used is using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. A total of 22 respondents from master students of chemistry education, lecturers and teachers of chemistry education participated in this study. The blended learning model analyzed in this study are Rotational blended learning models (station class, Lab/Whole Group class, flipped class, and Individual), Flex, Self-Blend, and Enriched-Virtual classes. The study results indicate that the blended learning model that the respondents chose the most suitable for multiple representation-based chemistry learning was the Flipped Class model (50%), while the one that was not selected was the Individual Rotation model.
基于多元表示的高中化学混合学习模式
2019冠状病毒病疫情期间的在线远程教育为教师和学生带来了新的挑战和机遇。据报道,混合学习方法是一种很有前途的替代方法。然而,没有具体的研究揭示了适当的混合学习模式,化学学习需要化学表征,可以提高高中水平的批判性思维和解决问题的能力。本研究采用现象学方法进行定性研究。使用的数据收集技术是使用问卷调查、访谈和文档。共有22名化学教育硕士生、化学教育讲师和教师参与了本研究。本研究分析的混合学习模式有轮转混合学习模式(站班、实验室/整个小组班、翻转班和个人班)、Flex、自混合和充实虚拟班。研究结果表明,受访者选择最适合基于多元表征的化学学习的混合学习模式是翻转课堂模式(50%),而未选择的混合学习模式是个体旋转模式(Individual Rotation)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信