Kobiety jako oskarżycielki w rzymskich postępowaniach karnych?

D. Nowicka
{"title":"Kobiety jako oskarżycielki w rzymskich postępowaniach karnych?","authors":"D. Nowicka","doi":"10.19195/0524-4544.335.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the issue of the legal legitimation of Roman women to bring a formal accusation in cases other than their own or regarding — to some extent — their relatives, which is still debatable in Roman law literature. The analysis concerns mostly crimen maiestatis and crimen annonae trials, regarding which sources seem to be particularly disputable. Despite ambivalent conclusions drawn on their basis by various authors, it occurs that women could act as both informers and formal accusers in those cases of a very specific nature, which constituted a serious departure from general rules concerning their legitimation, but was rooted in the utilitas publica concept.","PeriodicalId":82260,"journal":{"name":"Panstwo i prawo : organ Zrzeszenia Prawnikow Demokratow w Polsce","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panstwo i prawo : organ Zrzeszenia Prawnikow Demokratow w Polsce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/0524-4544.335.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the issue of the legal legitimation of Roman women to bring a formal accusation in cases other than their own or regarding — to some extent — their relatives, which is still debatable in Roman law literature. The analysis concerns mostly crimen maiestatis and crimen annonae trials, regarding which sources seem to be particularly disputable. Despite ambivalent conclusions drawn on their basis by various authors, it occurs that women could act as both informers and formal accusers in those cases of a very specific nature, which constituted a serious departure from general rules concerning their legitimation, but was rooted in the utilitas publica concept.
本文主要探讨罗马妇女在非本人案件或在某种程度上涉及其亲属案件中提出正式指控的法律正当性问题,这一问题在罗马法文献中仍有争议。该分析主要涉及未婚犯和未婚犯审判,关于这两个来源似乎特别有争议。尽管不同的作者根据这些结论得出了矛盾的结论,但在那些性质非常具体的案件中,妇女既可以充当告密者,也可以充当正式的指控者,这严重背离了关于其合法性的一般规则,但却植根于公共效用概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信