Social Injustice by Prescription?

Abstract

Since independence, Tanzania has instituted healthcare reforms in the quest for improving availability, quality, and social equity in access to public medical services. The extent to which the most recent healthcare reforms have impacted the existing patterns of medicinal prescription writing is largely opaque in the literature. This paper relies on data from two hospitals in Dar es Salaam. It emerges that the practice of categorising healthcare seekers into groups depending upon their varied health status and their entitlement to benefits has resulted in differential prescription allocations that might be interpreted as inequitable. The majority of very low income patients finance their healthcare through out-of-pocket payments and support of the Community Health Fund; this group receives a greater ratio of services with zero prescriptions, less poly-pharmacy and fewer prescribed generic medications than the proportion received by well-to-do patients with healthcare insurance. However, the medical and non-medical determinants of this differential in prescription allocation remain unclear, and so too, the ethical implications of such patterns in Tanzania’s out-patient medical service system are inconclusive.