Effect of different nitrogen management and Tillage options on soil, nutrient content, uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using under active crop canopy sensor

T. Pratap, M. Haque, Hanuman Singh, M. Ghosh, Vishesh Pratap Singh, Rajneesh Singh
{"title":"Effect of different nitrogen management and Tillage options on soil, nutrient content, uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using under active crop canopy sensor","authors":"T. Pratap, M. Haque, Hanuman Singh, M. Ghosh, Vishesh Pratap Singh, Rajneesh Singh","doi":"10.22271/CHEMI.2021.V9.I2I.11880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted during Rabi at BAC, Research Farm Sabour to access the effect of precession nitrogen management and tillage practices on growth parameter of wheat. The experiment was carried two tillage practices (conventional tillage, CT and Zero tillage, ZT) in main-plots and six different nutrient management practices [viz.N1-Recommended dose of nutrients (150:60:40 kg NPK/ha, full P & K and ½ N at basal +1/2N in two splitting at 1st & 2nd irrigation- Top dressing after irrigation, N2-Recommended dose of nutrients (150:60:40kg NPK/ ha, full P & K and ½ N at basal +½ N in two splitting at 1st & 2nd irrigation-Top dressing before irrigation, N3-SSNM Based on Nutrient Expert (NE), N4-70% N of SSNM based on NE+ remaining N as guided by Green Seeker, N5 Nitrogen enriched plots (225:60:40Kg. NPK/ha.) and N6-SPAD based nutrient management, (75Kg. N as basal +25Kg. N as 1st top dress +25Kg. N at 42 SPAD reading) in sub plots with 3 replications. the conventional tillage recorded slightly higher grain yield than that of the zero tillage during both years of experimentation The maximum grain yield (45.5 and 49.4 q ha-1 in 1st year and 2nd year, respectively) was recorded from the plots received 70% N of SSNM based on nutrient expert system +remaining N guided by Green Seeker treatment and was significantly superior to the rest of the nutrient management practices.","PeriodicalId":13738,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chemical Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chemical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/CHEMI.2021.V9.I2I.11880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi at BAC, Research Farm Sabour to access the effect of precession nitrogen management and tillage practices on growth parameter of wheat. The experiment was carried two tillage practices (conventional tillage, CT and Zero tillage, ZT) in main-plots and six different nutrient management practices [viz.N1-Recommended dose of nutrients (150:60:40 kg NPK/ha, full P & K and ½ N at basal +1/2N in two splitting at 1st & 2nd irrigation- Top dressing after irrigation, N2-Recommended dose of nutrients (150:60:40kg NPK/ ha, full P & K and ½ N at basal +½ N in two splitting at 1st & 2nd irrigation-Top dressing before irrigation, N3-SSNM Based on Nutrient Expert (NE), N4-70% N of SSNM based on NE+ remaining N as guided by Green Seeker, N5 Nitrogen enriched plots (225:60:40Kg. NPK/ha.) and N6-SPAD based nutrient management, (75Kg. N as basal +25Kg. N as 1st top dress +25Kg. N at 42 SPAD reading) in sub plots with 3 replications. the conventional tillage recorded slightly higher grain yield than that of the zero tillage during both years of experimentation The maximum grain yield (45.5 and 49.4 q ha-1 in 1st year and 2nd year, respectively) was recorded from the plots received 70% N of SSNM based on nutrient expert system +remaining N guided by Green Seeker treatment and was significantly superior to the rest of the nutrient management practices.
主动作物冠层传感器下不同氮素管理和耕作方式对小麦土壤、养分含量、吸收和产量的影响
为探讨进动氮肥管理和耕作方式对小麦生长参数的影响,于秋季在北京农业研究中心进行了田间试验。实验两个耕作实践(传统耕作,CT和免耕、ZT型)在主区和六种不同养分管理实践(viz.N1-Recommended剂量的营养(氮磷钾150:60:40公斤/公顷,全P和K和½N基础+ 1/2N两个分裂1 & 2灌溉,灌溉后根外追肥,N2-Recommended剂量的营养(150:60:40kg氮磷钾/公顷,全P和K和½N在两个分裂的基底+½N 1 & 2 irrigation-Top敷料之前灌溉,N3-SSNM以营养专家(NE)为基础,N4-70% N以NE+剩余N为基础,Green Seeker为指导,N5富氮地块(225:60:40Kg)。NPK/ha)和N6-SPAD为基础的养分管理(75Kg)。N为基础+25Kg。N作为第1件正装+25Kg。N在42 SPAD读数时),共3次重复。常规耕作的籽粒产量均略高于免耕,其中以营养专家系统+ Green Seeker处理为指导,施氮量为70%的SSNM +剩余氮处理,第1年和第2年籽粒产量最高,分别为45.5和49.4 q ha-1,显著优于其他养分管理方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信