Academicians’ Views on the Contribution of International Academic Mobility for Professional Development (The USA Sample)

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Aydın Balyer, Kenan Ozcan
{"title":"Academicians’ Views on the Contribution of International Academic Mobility for Professional Development (The USA Sample)","authors":"Aydın Balyer, Kenan Ozcan","doi":"10.14689/enad.31.1606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to determine academicians’ views on the contribution of international academic mobility to their professional and personal development. The qualitative study was conducted with a “case study” design. The study group consisted of 15 faculty members determined with snowball sampling method. The data were collected with a semi-structured interview technique, and analyzed with an inductive analysis method. Results showed that international academic mobility contributed to academicians’ personal and professional developments. However, the participants some difficulties such as established negative academic practices, staff constraints, inability to participate in decision-making and adaptation to corporate culture. It was also understood that some academicians are thinking of going back abroad because of the frustration with their promotion process. In addition, the academicians working in the fields of science and engineering in the newly established universities have problems with conducting research and producing publications due to the technical infrastructure deficiencies. It was determined that academicians expect project budgets to increase, strengthen workshops and develop laboratory infrastructures, and access to library databases. The regulations and laws regarding academic mobility for international purposes should be rearranged and the conditions should be improved.","PeriodicalId":41153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.31.1606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine academicians’ views on the contribution of international academic mobility to their professional and personal development. The qualitative study was conducted with a “case study” design. The study group consisted of 15 faculty members determined with snowball sampling method. The data were collected with a semi-structured interview technique, and analyzed with an inductive analysis method. Results showed that international academic mobility contributed to academicians’ personal and professional developments. However, the participants some difficulties such as established negative academic practices, staff constraints, inability to participate in decision-making and adaptation to corporate culture. It was also understood that some academicians are thinking of going back abroad because of the frustration with their promotion process. In addition, the academicians working in the fields of science and engineering in the newly established universities have problems with conducting research and producing publications due to the technical infrastructure deficiencies. It was determined that academicians expect project budgets to increase, strengthen workshops and develop laboratory infrastructures, and access to library databases. The regulations and laws regarding academic mobility for international purposes should be rearranged and the conditions should be improved.
学者对国际学术流动对专业发展贡献的看法(以美国为样本)
本研究的目的是确定学者对国际学术流动对其专业和个人发展的贡献的看法。定性研究采用“案例研究”设计。研究组由15名教师组成,采用滚雪球抽样法确定。数据采用半结构化访谈法收集,并采用归纳分析法进行分析。结果显示,国际学术流动有助于院士的个人和专业发展。然而,参与者也面临着一些困难,如既定的负面学术实践、员工的约束、无法参与决策以及对企业文化的适应等。据了解,由于在晋升过程中遇到挫折,一些院士正在考虑回国。此外,由于技术基础设施的不足,在新成立的大学中从事科学和工程领域工作的院士在进行研究和出版出版物方面也存在问题。据确定,院士们期望项目预算增加,加强研讨会和发展实验室基础设施,并获得图书馆数据库。应重新整理有关国际学术流动的法律法规,改善学术流动的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信