Disharmony of Domestic Refining Provisons for Mineral and Coal in Indonesian Laws and Regulations

Ira Fadilla Rohmadanti, Febriansyah Ramadhan, Ilham Dwi Rafiqi
{"title":"Disharmony of Domestic Refining Provisons for Mineral and Coal in Indonesian Laws and Regulations","authors":"Ira Fadilla Rohmadanti, Febriansyah Ramadhan, Ilham Dwi Rafiqi","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.31236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic refining practices of minerals and coal in Indonesia have not run efficiently and provided provisions for the country. The challenge of realizing the purification policy comes in turn, one of which is the problem of regulation. Hence, this study aims to examine and analyze mineral and coal (referred to as minerba) refining policy in the country in the laws and regulations, ranging from the level of legislation to implementing regulations. The research method used is normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that domestic minerba refining policies stated in many rules tends to be not one-way and is flexible, indicated by frequent changes in domestic refining policy. As a result, it causes disharmony between the Minerba Bill and the implementing regulations. Some implementing regulations, particularly Ministerial Regulations, are not in accordance with the principle of the obligation to increase the value-add by carrying out processing and refining domestically. Moreover, the regulation is considered contradictory due to providing opportunities for exporting minerals that have not been processed and refined, leading to reduced state revenues and impact on state losses.","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.31236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Domestic refining practices of minerals and coal in Indonesia have not run efficiently and provided provisions for the country. The challenge of realizing the purification policy comes in turn, one of which is the problem of regulation. Hence, this study aims to examine and analyze mineral and coal (referred to as minerba) refining policy in the country in the laws and regulations, ranging from the level of legislation to implementing regulations. The research method used is normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that domestic minerba refining policies stated in many rules tends to be not one-way and is flexible, indicated by frequent changes in domestic refining policy. As a result, it causes disharmony between the Minerba Bill and the implementing regulations. Some implementing regulations, particularly Ministerial Regulations, are not in accordance with the principle of the obligation to increase the value-add by carrying out processing and refining domestically. Moreover, the regulation is considered contradictory due to providing opportunities for exporting minerals that have not been processed and refined, leading to reduced state revenues and impact on state losses.
印尼法律法规中关于矿产和煤炭国内精炼规定的不协调
印度尼西亚国内的矿物和煤炭精炼作业效率不高,为该国提供了供应。实现净化政策的挑战接踵而至,其中之一就是监管问题。因此,本研究旨在从法律法规层面,从立法层面到实施法规层面,对该国的矿产和煤炭(简称minerba)精炼政策进行审查和分析。所使用的研究方法是使用成文法和概念方法的规范性法律研究。结果表明,许多规则中规定的国内矿产品炼制政策往往不是单向的,而是灵活的,表现为国内炼制政策的频繁变化。因此,它造成了Minerba法案与实施条例之间的不协调。一些实施条例,特别是部级条例,不符合国内加工炼制增加附加值的义务原则。此外,该规定被认为是矛盾的,因为它为出口未经加工和精炼的矿物提供了机会,导致国家收入减少,并对国家损失产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信