J12 HD brain-train: enhancing neural plasticity using real-time FMRI neurofeedback training

M. Papoutsi, Joerg Magerkurth, O. Josephs, Sophia E. Pépés, Temi Ibitoye, R. Reilmann, N. Weiskopf, D. Langbehn, G. Rees, S. Tabrizi
{"title":"J12 HD brain-train: enhancing neural plasticity using real-time FMRI neurofeedback training","authors":"M. Papoutsi, Joerg Magerkurth, O. Josephs, Sophia E. Pépés, Temi Ibitoye, R. Reilmann, N. Weiskopf, D. Langbehn, G. Rees, S. Tabrizi","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims Methods that can normalize neuronal function, such as neurofeedback (NF) training, could support symptom management in HD as primary or adjunct treatments to other disease-modifying therapies. During NF training, participants receive feedback on the activity of a target brain region and learn by trial and error to regulate it. The aim of the present study was to test whether HD patients can learn to regulate their brain activity using NF training and to compare two different NF training protocols to establish which one is more effective. Methods Thirty-two HD patients completed a real-time fMRI NF training paradigm consisting of 4 training visits (4–14 days apart). Half of the participants received feedback derived from their own brain activity measured using BOLD contrast fMRI (treatment group), while the other half received sham feedback derived from unrelated participants in the treatment group (control group). Participants were further divided in two subgroups, one receiving neurofeedback derived from the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA), and another receiving neurofeedback based on the cross-correlation of SMA and left striatum activity (a measure of connectivity). Participants were blinded to group allocation. Results To evaluate successful learning, we tested for a linear increase in participants’ ability to enhance fMRI activity/connectivity voluntarily across visits. Participants in the SMA-activity NF group were the only group that showed a linear increase across visits. We also evaluated participants’ capacity to upregulate their brain activity after the end of training in the absence of explicit feedback (transfer effects). The SMA-activity NF group was again the only group that showed successful upregulation. Conclusions Our results suggest that SMA-activity NF training is a more promising approach than connectivity-based NF training. Future larger trials focusing only on activity-based NF training, are now needed to enable us to gather more evidence on the efficacy of the method in symptom-management in HD.","PeriodicalId":16509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","volume":"17 1","pages":"A102 - A102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aims Methods that can normalize neuronal function, such as neurofeedback (NF) training, could support symptom management in HD as primary or adjunct treatments to other disease-modifying therapies. During NF training, participants receive feedback on the activity of a target brain region and learn by trial and error to regulate it. The aim of the present study was to test whether HD patients can learn to regulate their brain activity using NF training and to compare two different NF training protocols to establish which one is more effective. Methods Thirty-two HD patients completed a real-time fMRI NF training paradigm consisting of 4 training visits (4–14 days apart). Half of the participants received feedback derived from their own brain activity measured using BOLD contrast fMRI (treatment group), while the other half received sham feedback derived from unrelated participants in the treatment group (control group). Participants were further divided in two subgroups, one receiving neurofeedback derived from the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA), and another receiving neurofeedback based on the cross-correlation of SMA and left striatum activity (a measure of connectivity). Participants were blinded to group allocation. Results To evaluate successful learning, we tested for a linear increase in participants’ ability to enhance fMRI activity/connectivity voluntarily across visits. Participants in the SMA-activity NF group were the only group that showed a linear increase across visits. We also evaluated participants’ capacity to upregulate their brain activity after the end of training in the absence of explicit feedback (transfer effects). The SMA-activity NF group was again the only group that showed successful upregulation. Conclusions Our results suggest that SMA-activity NF training is a more promising approach than connectivity-based NF training. Future larger trials focusing only on activity-based NF training, are now needed to enable us to gather more evidence on the efficacy of the method in symptom-management in HD.
HD脑训练:利用实时FMRI神经反馈训练增强神经可塑性
背景和目的使神经元功能正常化的方法,如神经反馈(NF)训练,可以支持HD的症状管理,作为其他疾病改善疗法的主要或辅助治疗。在NF训练中,参与者接收到目标脑区活动的反馈,并通过试错来学习如何调节它。本研究的目的是测试HD患者是否可以学习使用NF训练来调节他们的大脑活动,并比较两种不同的NF训练方案,以确定哪一种更有效。方法32例HD患者完成实时fMRI NF训练范式,包括4次训练访问(间隔4 ~ 14天)。一半的参与者接受的反馈来自他们自己的大脑活动,使用BOLD对比fMRI(治疗组)测量,而另一半接受的是来自治疗组(对照组)无关参与者的虚假反馈。参与者被进一步分为两组,一组接受来自辅助运动区(SMA)的神经反馈,另一组接受基于SMA和左纹状体活动相互关联的神经反馈(一种连通性的测量)。参与者对分组分配不知情。为了评估成功的学习,我们测试了参与者在访问期间自愿增强fMRI活动/连接的能力是否呈线性增长。sma活动NF组的参与者是唯一在每次访问中显示线性增加的组。我们还评估了参与者在训练结束后在没有明确反馈的情况下上调大脑活动的能力(转移效应)。sma活性NF组再次成为唯一成功上调的组。结论与基于连接的NF训练相比,SMA-activity训练是一种更有希望的训练方法。现在需要进行更大规模的试验,只关注基于活动的NF训练,以使我们能够收集更多关于该方法在HD症状管理中的有效性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信