Step-by-Step Process for Assessing the Economic Impact of Regional Medical Campuses in Canada

Geneviève Maltais LaPointe, K. Lemky, P. Gagné, Jill Konkin, Karl Stobbe, Gervan Fearon
{"title":"Step-by-Step Process for Assessing the Economic Impact of Regional Medical Campuses in Canada","authors":"Geneviève Maltais LaPointe, K. Lemky, P. Gagné, Jill Konkin, Karl Stobbe, Gervan Fearon","doi":"10.24926/jrmc.v6i1.4554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regional medical campuses (RMCs) create positive economic impacts in communities and small cities. RMCs increase educational capacity, medical services, and address the shortage or maldistribution of physicians in rural areas. Our paper answers the question: How do you assess the economic impact of a RMC?\nMethods: The Canadian Input-Output (I-O) model and the Simplified American Council on Education (ACE) model are adapted to assess the economic impact of an individual RMC using a step-by-step process. The models are tested using data from three Canadian RMCs.\nResults: A comparison of the two models found similarities with data requirements and spreadsheet calculations. However, the Canadian I-O model spreadsheet is linked to Statistics Canada multipliers and calculations are more complex. Outputs are calculated for multiple economic variables. The Simplified ACE model, in contrast, uses a single multiplier and provides a single number by input category and a cumulative total of all impacts.\nConclusion: Both models successfully assess economic impacts of RMC. The step-by-step process allows RMC administrators and others to understand the limitations of each model, but also facilitates an in-house economic assessment of RMC. The authors provide guidance on choosing the best model.","PeriodicalId":92811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of regional medical campuses","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of regional medical campuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/jrmc.v6i1.4554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regional medical campuses (RMCs) create positive economic impacts in communities and small cities. RMCs increase educational capacity, medical services, and address the shortage or maldistribution of physicians in rural areas. Our paper answers the question: How do you assess the economic impact of a RMC? Methods: The Canadian Input-Output (I-O) model and the Simplified American Council on Education (ACE) model are adapted to assess the economic impact of an individual RMC using a step-by-step process. The models are tested using data from three Canadian RMCs. Results: A comparison of the two models found similarities with data requirements and spreadsheet calculations. However, the Canadian I-O model spreadsheet is linked to Statistics Canada multipliers and calculations are more complex. Outputs are calculated for multiple economic variables. The Simplified ACE model, in contrast, uses a single multiplier and provides a single number by input category and a cumulative total of all impacts. Conclusion: Both models successfully assess economic impacts of RMC. The step-by-step process allows RMC administrators and others to understand the limitations of each model, but also facilitates an in-house economic assessment of RMC. The authors provide guidance on choosing the best model.
逐步评估加拿大区域医学校园经济影响的过程
背景:区域医学校园(rmc)在社区和小城市创造了积极的经济影响。农村医疗保健中心提高了教育能力和医疗服务,并解决了农村地区医生短缺或分布不均的问题。我们的论文回答了这个问题:如何评估RMC的经济影响?方法:采用加拿大投入产出(I-O)模型和简化的美国教育委员会(ACE)模型,采用逐步的过程来评估单个RMC的经济影响。这些模型使用来自三家加拿大rmc的数据进行了测试。结果:两个模型的比较发现了数据需求和电子表格计算的相似之处。然而,加拿大的I-O模型电子表格与加拿大统计局的乘数相关联,计算更加复杂。产出是根据多个经济变量计算的。相比之下,简化ACE模型使用单个乘数,并根据输入类别和所有影响的累积总数提供单个数字。结论:两个模型都成功地评估了RMC的经济影响。一步一步的过程允许RMC管理员和其他人了解每个模型的局限性,但也促进了RMC的内部经济评估。作者提供了选择最佳模型的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信