{"title":"La máquina como exoconciencia literaria en algunas obras de César Aira, Mario Levrero y Ricardo Pigia","authors":"V. Mora","doi":"10.25185/6.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the very beginning of Literature, there’s a deep link between human beings and imaginary androids. The presence of this ancient topic in nowadays literature should by no means be regarded as extraordinary, insofar those machines in current times are involved in worldwide scientific and philosophical discussions about the ethical limits of Artificial Intelligence and the trueness and scales of their cognition and awareness. The main idea of this paper is that there are good grounds to suppose that our perceiving and reasoning skills are indeed reproductible and developable by machines, not only in the view of neuroscientific theories that maintain expanded or distributed cognition, but also in the imagination of some Latin-American writers, such as Mario Levrero (La maquina de pensar en Gladys), Cesar Aira (in many books, especially in El pequeno monje budista) and Ricardo Piglia (La ciudad ausente). Those authors seem to explore the possibility of a fictious exoconsciousness.","PeriodicalId":52962,"journal":{"name":"Humanidades","volume":"3 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25185/6.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From the very beginning of Literature, there’s a deep link between human beings and imaginary androids. The presence of this ancient topic in nowadays literature should by no means be regarded as extraordinary, insofar those machines in current times are involved in worldwide scientific and philosophical discussions about the ethical limits of Artificial Intelligence and the trueness and scales of their cognition and awareness. The main idea of this paper is that there are good grounds to suppose that our perceiving and reasoning skills are indeed reproductible and developable by machines, not only in the view of neuroscientific theories that maintain expanded or distributed cognition, but also in the imagination of some Latin-American writers, such as Mario Levrero (La maquina de pensar en Gladys), Cesar Aira (in many books, especially in El pequeno monje budista) and Ricardo Piglia (La ciudad ausente). Those authors seem to explore the possibility of a fictious exoconsciousness.
从文学的一开始,人类和想象中的机器人就有着很深的联系。这个古老的话题出现在当今的文学作品中,绝不应该被认为是非同寻常的,因为在当今时代,这些机器参与了关于人工智能的伦理限制以及它们的认知和意识的真实性和规模的全球科学和哲学讨论。本文的主要观点是,我们有充分的理由假设我们的感知和推理技能确实可以被机器复制和发展,不仅在维持扩展或分布式认知的神经科学理论的观点中,而且在一些拉丁美洲作家的想象中,如马里奥·莱维罗(La maquina de pensar en Gladys),凯撒·艾拉(在许多书中,特别是在El pequeno monje budista)和里卡多·皮格里亚(La ciudad ausente)。这些作者似乎在探索一种虚构的外意识的可能性。