A 20-year intellectual journey with “EMES” through the land of social enterprise

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
M. Nyssens, J. Defourny, S. Adam
{"title":"A 20-year intellectual journey with “EMES” through the land of social enterprise","authors":"M. Nyssens, J. Defourny, S. Adam","doi":"10.1108/sej-05-2023-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn 2022, the EMES Network celebrated its 20th anniversary. The purpose of this paper is to trace the intellectual path of social enterprise (SE) research that has unfolded through some of the major EMES research projects.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis journey is recounted through three major milestones: the emergence and development of the EMES approach; the identification of various SE schools of thought; the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.\n\n\nFindings\nThe first section digs into the roots of the EMES approach – an ideal-type which allowed researchers to explore an SE field that was then largely unknown. In a second stage, a reading grid was developed to identify the different SE conceptions, their convergences and their divergences. In a third step, the ICSEM Project, acknowledging the impossibility to provide a single, universal definition of SE, aimed to identify SE models across the world. Defourny and Nyssens developed an SE typology and made the hypothesis that it was neither country-specific nor even context-specific. Based on the EMES ideal-type (which constituted a particularly relevant tool to inform the diversity of SE models), data were collected on over 700 SEs worldwide; three major SE models were found in almost all the countries covered.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis contribution does not aim to summarise all the – numerous and fruitful – research projects carried out by EMES members, but to show the common thread that runs through several of them.\n","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-05-2023-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose In 2022, the EMES Network celebrated its 20th anniversary. The purpose of this paper is to trace the intellectual path of social enterprise (SE) research that has unfolded through some of the major EMES research projects. Design/methodology/approach This journey is recounted through three major milestones: the emergence and development of the EMES approach; the identification of various SE schools of thought; the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project. Findings The first section digs into the roots of the EMES approach – an ideal-type which allowed researchers to explore an SE field that was then largely unknown. In a second stage, a reading grid was developed to identify the different SE conceptions, their convergences and their divergences. In a third step, the ICSEM Project, acknowledging the impossibility to provide a single, universal definition of SE, aimed to identify SE models across the world. Defourny and Nyssens developed an SE typology and made the hypothesis that it was neither country-specific nor even context-specific. Based on the EMES ideal-type (which constituted a particularly relevant tool to inform the diversity of SE models), data were collected on over 700 SEs worldwide; three major SE models were found in almost all the countries covered. Originality/value This contribution does not aim to summarise all the – numerous and fruitful – research projects carried out by EMES members, but to show the common thread that runs through several of them.
与“EMES”一起走过社会企业的20年知识之旅
2022年,EMES网络庆祝成立20周年。本文的目的是通过一些主要的EMES研究项目来追踪社会企业(SE)研究的智力路径。设计/方法/方法这段旅程通过三个主要里程碑来叙述:EMES方法的出现和发展;不同SE思想流派的认同;国际比较社会企业模式(ICSEM)项目第一部分深入探讨了EMES方法的根源,这是一种理想的方法,它允许研究人员探索当时基本上未知的SE领域。在第二阶段,开发了一个阅读网格来识别不同的SE概念,它们的趋同和分歧。在第三步中,ICSEM项目承认不可能提供一个单一的、通用的SE定义,旨在识别世界范围内的SE模型。Defourny和Nyssens提出了一种SE类型学,并假设它既不是特定国家的,也不是特定环境的。基于EMES理想类型(它构成了告知SE模型多样性的一个特别相关的工具),收集了全球700多个SE的数据;在几乎所有被调查的国家都发现了三种主要的SE模型。原创性/价值本文的目的不是总结EMES成员开展的所有(数量众多且成果丰硕的)研究项目,而是展示贯穿其中几个项目的共同主线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信