Harvesting the Benefits of Iceland’s Energy Resources

E. Hreinsson
{"title":"Harvesting the Benefits of Iceland’s Energy Resources","authors":"E. Hreinsson","doi":"10.1109/UPEC.2019.8893562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Iceland is blessed with rich renewable energy resources in hydro, geothermal and wind. Wind is largely untapped, but a considerable part of the hydro and geothermal resources have been harnessed in the last few decades, mostly for local energy intensive industry (EII). The development has been massive and today, electricity consumption per capita is already, by far the highest in the world, exceeding the OECD average by a factor of almost 7. In spite of this extensive development, there is still room for further expansion, since only about a third of the available economical resources have been tapped. The remainder includes geothermal and hydro projects, categorized for environmental restrictions in the preservation and on-hold categories of the Master Plan (MP), as discussed further in the paper. In addition, almost all wind resources are completely untapped.This paper assesses the potential economic benefit of marketing the renewable electricity of Iceland directly by export in larger markets, as opposed to selling them locally to the EII, which in the past has been the beneficiary of tapping these resources in this isolated power system. However, with maturing submarine link technology, it may well be economical to transmit and integrate these energy resources into EU or UK markets, thereby realizing the economic rent of these resources.The assessment in principle is twofold. (1) First, a one-way, constant bulk transfer to the United Kingdom (UK) is possible, assuming purchase agreements with prices comparable to those paid to renewable or nuclear generators by the UK government in recent years. (2) Secondly a flexible transfer is briefly discussed, where the power flow may even alternate to and from Iceland and be variable, in line with market prices in the UK or hydro conditions on the Icelandic side. The paper estimates numerically the benefits in the first case, as the income from energy sales, minus the cost of generation and transmission across a submarine HVDC link to the UK or EU markets. The 2nd case remains to be investigated.The main results are that the total economic rent is comparable to the total Icelandic state tax income per year, or around 2 - 5 Billion US$ per year, with fully developed hydro and geothermal schemes in Iceland, as further specified below. The question, who will reap these benefits, in addition to the resource owners, is an open one.","PeriodicalId":6670,"journal":{"name":"2019 54th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","volume":"7 1 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 54th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2019.8893562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Iceland is blessed with rich renewable energy resources in hydro, geothermal and wind. Wind is largely untapped, but a considerable part of the hydro and geothermal resources have been harnessed in the last few decades, mostly for local energy intensive industry (EII). The development has been massive and today, electricity consumption per capita is already, by far the highest in the world, exceeding the OECD average by a factor of almost 7. In spite of this extensive development, there is still room for further expansion, since only about a third of the available economical resources have been tapped. The remainder includes geothermal and hydro projects, categorized for environmental restrictions in the preservation and on-hold categories of the Master Plan (MP), as discussed further in the paper. In addition, almost all wind resources are completely untapped.This paper assesses the potential economic benefit of marketing the renewable electricity of Iceland directly by export in larger markets, as opposed to selling them locally to the EII, which in the past has been the beneficiary of tapping these resources in this isolated power system. However, with maturing submarine link technology, it may well be economical to transmit and integrate these energy resources into EU or UK markets, thereby realizing the economic rent of these resources.The assessment in principle is twofold. (1) First, a one-way, constant bulk transfer to the United Kingdom (UK) is possible, assuming purchase agreements with prices comparable to those paid to renewable or nuclear generators by the UK government in recent years. (2) Secondly a flexible transfer is briefly discussed, where the power flow may even alternate to and from Iceland and be variable, in line with market prices in the UK or hydro conditions on the Icelandic side. The paper estimates numerically the benefits in the first case, as the income from energy sales, minus the cost of generation and transmission across a submarine HVDC link to the UK or EU markets. The 2nd case remains to be investigated.The main results are that the total economic rent is comparable to the total Icelandic state tax income per year, or around 2 - 5 Billion US$ per year, with fully developed hydro and geothermal schemes in Iceland, as further specified below. The question, who will reap these benefits, in addition to the resource owners, is an open one.
收获冰岛能源资源的好处
冰岛拥有丰富的水力、地热、风能等可再生能源。风能在很大程度上是未开发的,但在过去的几十年里,相当一部分的水力和地热资源已经被利用,主要用于当地的能源密集型工业(EII)。发展是巨大的,今天,人均用电量已经是世界上最高的,超过经合组织平均水平近7倍。尽管有了这种广泛的发展,但仍有进一步扩大的余地,因为只有大约三分之一的现有经济资源得到利用。其余的包括地热和水电项目,在总体规划(MP)的保护和搁置类别中被归类为环境限制,如本文进一步讨论。此外,几乎所有的风能资源都是完全未开发的。本文评估了在更大的市场上直接出口冰岛可再生电力的潜在经济效益,而不是在当地向EII出售,后者过去一直是在这个孤立的电力系统中开发这些资源的受益者。然而,随着海底链路技术的成熟,将这些能源资源传输和整合到欧盟或英国市场,从而实现这些资源的经济租金,是很经济的。原则上的评估是双重的。(1)首先,假设购买协议的价格与近年来英国政府支付给可再生能源或核能发电机的价格相当,那么向英国(UK)进行单向、持续的大宗转移是可能的。(2)其次,简要讨论了灵活的转移,其中功率流甚至可以交替进出冰岛并且是可变的,与英国的市场价格或冰岛方面的水力条件一致。论文对第一种情况下的收益进行了数值估计,即能源销售收入减去通过海底高压直流输电连接到英国或欧盟市场的发电和输电成本。第二起案件仍待调查。主要结果是,经济租金总额与冰岛每年的国家税收总额相当,或每年约为25亿美元,冰岛的水力和地热计划得到充分开发,如下文进一步说明。除了资源所有者之外,谁将获得这些好处,这是一个悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信