Non-Targeted Self-Measured Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control in Public and Private Health Systems in Brazil

Q4 Medicine
Gabriela de Oliveira Salazar, G. D. O. Almeida, J. A. Barreto-Filho, M. Almeida-Santos, E. Melo, F. Aidar, José Ícaro Nunes Cruz, J. Oliveira, L. Baumworcel, A. Sousa
{"title":"Non-Targeted Self-Measured Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control in Public and Private Health Systems in Brazil","authors":"Gabriela de Oliveira Salazar, G. D. O. Almeida, J. A. Barreto-Filho, M. Almeida-Santos, E. Melo, F. Aidar, José Ícaro Nunes Cruz, J. Oliveira, L. Baumworcel, A. Sousa","doi":"10.36660/ijcs.202220144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is estimated that more than 30% of the Brazilian population has systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), and mostly as an uncontrolled disease. The most recent Brazilian Guideline of Hypertension recommends the practice of self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) as one of the strategies for a better control of SAH, but there is no consensus about the efficiency of this tool. Objective: To assess the control of SAH and the practice of non-targeted self-measured BP (SMBP) among hypertensive users of the Unified Health System (SUS) and the Supplementary Network (SN). Methods: This is a cross-sectional, observational, analytical study, with a stratified probability sample. One thousand volunteers were investigated, being 500 from SUS and 500 from the SN. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed considering a 5% significance level. Results: Patients from SUS presented inferior sociodemographic data (schooling, social status) in relation to those of the SN (p < 0.001), and showed lower control of SAH (p = 0.014), as well as more visits to the emergency room in the past year due to hypertension (p = 0.002), and fewer regular appointments with the cardiologist (p = 0.004). SMBP was equally present in both assessed groups (p = 0.567), even though users of the SN have been more advised to not conduct such a practice (p = 0.002). SMBP (p < 0.001) was an independent factor for uncontrolled SAH both in SUS (OR = 3.424) and in the SN (OR = 3.474). Conclusion: Patients in SUS presented lower SAH control. The practice of SMBP, mostly practiced with an uncalibrated digital device, was equally present in both groups and became an independent factor of uncontrolled SAH.","PeriodicalId":32690,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.202220144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is estimated that more than 30% of the Brazilian population has systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), and mostly as an uncontrolled disease. The most recent Brazilian Guideline of Hypertension recommends the practice of self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) as one of the strategies for a better control of SAH, but there is no consensus about the efficiency of this tool. Objective: To assess the control of SAH and the practice of non-targeted self-measured BP (SMBP) among hypertensive users of the Unified Health System (SUS) and the Supplementary Network (SN). Methods: This is a cross-sectional, observational, analytical study, with a stratified probability sample. One thousand volunteers were investigated, being 500 from SUS and 500 from the SN. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed considering a 5% significance level. Results: Patients from SUS presented inferior sociodemographic data (schooling, social status) in relation to those of the SN (p < 0.001), and showed lower control of SAH (p = 0.014), as well as more visits to the emergency room in the past year due to hypertension (p = 0.002), and fewer regular appointments with the cardiologist (p = 0.004). SMBP was equally present in both assessed groups (p = 0.567), even though users of the SN have been more advised to not conduct such a practice (p = 0.002). SMBP (p < 0.001) was an independent factor for uncontrolled SAH both in SUS (OR = 3.424) and in the SN (OR = 3.474). Conclusion: Patients in SUS presented lower SAH control. The practice of SMBP, mostly practiced with an uncalibrated digital device, was equally present in both groups and became an independent factor of uncontrolled SAH.
巴西公共和私人卫生系统的非目标自我测量血压和高血压控制
背景:据估计,超过30%的巴西人患有全身性动脉高血压(SAH),并且大多数是一种无法控制的疾病。最新的巴西高血压指南建议将自我测量血压(BP)作为更好地控制SAH的策略之一,但对于该工具的效率尚无共识。目的:评价统一卫生系统(SUS)和补充网络(SN)高血压用户的SAH控制情况和非目标自测血压(SMBP)的使用情况。方法:这是一项横断面、观察性、分析性研究,采用分层概率样本。1000名志愿者接受了调查,其中500人来自SUS, 500人来自SN。考虑5%的显著性水平进行单因素和多因素分析。结果:SUS患者的社会人口学资料(学校教育、社会地位)低于SN患者(p < 0.001), SAH控制率较低(p = 0.014),过去一年因高血压就诊急诊室的次数较多(p = 0.002),与心脏病专家的定期就诊次数较少(p = 0.004)。SMBP在两个评估组中同样存在(p = 0.567),即使SN的用户被更多地建议不要进行这种做法(p = 0.002)。SMBP (p < 0.001)是SUS (OR = 3.424)和SN (OR = 3.474)未控制的SAH的独立因素。结论:SUS患者SAH控制率较低。SMBP的实践,大多是用未校准的数字设备进行的,在两组中都同样存在,并成为不受控制的SAH的独立因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信