Significance and role of homeostatic model assessment in the evaluation of glucose regulation mechanisms

S. Nikolić, N. Ćurić, R. Mijović, B. Ilinčić, Damir Benc
{"title":"Significance and role of homeostatic model assessment in the evaluation of glucose regulation mechanisms","authors":"S. Nikolić, N. Ćurić, R. Mijović, B. Ilinčić, Damir Benc","doi":"10.2298/MPNS1706155N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Mathematical formulas, such as homeostatic model assessment indexes, proved to be useful for the estimation of insulin resistance. Nevertheless, numerous published results point to a considerable variability of their reference values. The aim of this study was to use homeostatic model assessment indexes and evaluate levels of insulin resistance in nondiabetic patients. Material and Methods. The study included 486 individuals (mean age 36.84 ± 12.86; 17% of males and 83% of females). Blood sampling was performed in order to determine glucose and insulin plasma levels, at the 0th and 120th minute of the oral glucose tolerance test. The indexes were calculated by the use of homeostatic model assessment 2 calculator, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity, and homeostatic model assessment of β-cells function. The results were statistically analyzed using a Data Analysis programme. Results. In the examined population, the average glycemic values of the oral glucose tolerance test were within the euglycemic scope (Gluc 0 = 4.76 ± 0.45 mmol/L; Gluc 120 = 5.24 ± 1.17 mmol/L), while the average values of calculated homeostatic model assessment indexes were: insulin resistance 1.41 ± 0.82; β-cells function 131.54 ± 49.41%, and insulin sensitivity 91.94 ± 47.32%. According to study cut-off values, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance was less than 2. We found 84 (17.28%) individuals with increased insulin resistance. Also, we set the lowest reference value for homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity at less than 50%. With the probability of 66.67% (x̄ ± 1SD), basal insulin level under 11.9 mIU/L can be considered to correspond to physiologic level of insulin resistance. Conclusion. The follow-up of increased insulin resistance and altered secretion of pancreatic β-cells, at early stages of glucose regulation disturbances, may be useful in assessing dynamics and level of glucose regulation disturbances and their appropriate treatment.","PeriodicalId":18511,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski pregled","volume":"112 1","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS1706155N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. Mathematical formulas, such as homeostatic model assessment indexes, proved to be useful for the estimation of insulin resistance. Nevertheless, numerous published results point to a considerable variability of their reference values. The aim of this study was to use homeostatic model assessment indexes and evaluate levels of insulin resistance in nondiabetic patients. Material and Methods. The study included 486 individuals (mean age 36.84 ± 12.86; 17% of males and 83% of females). Blood sampling was performed in order to determine glucose and insulin plasma levels, at the 0th and 120th minute of the oral glucose tolerance test. The indexes were calculated by the use of homeostatic model assessment 2 calculator, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity, and homeostatic model assessment of β-cells function. The results were statistically analyzed using a Data Analysis programme. Results. In the examined population, the average glycemic values of the oral glucose tolerance test were within the euglycemic scope (Gluc 0 = 4.76 ± 0.45 mmol/L; Gluc 120 = 5.24 ± 1.17 mmol/L), while the average values of calculated homeostatic model assessment indexes were: insulin resistance 1.41 ± 0.82; β-cells function 131.54 ± 49.41%, and insulin sensitivity 91.94 ± 47.32%. According to study cut-off values, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance was less than 2. We found 84 (17.28%) individuals with increased insulin resistance. Also, we set the lowest reference value for homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity at less than 50%. With the probability of 66.67% (x̄ ± 1SD), basal insulin level under 11.9 mIU/L can be considered to correspond to physiologic level of insulin resistance. Conclusion. The follow-up of increased insulin resistance and altered secretion of pancreatic β-cells, at early stages of glucose regulation disturbances, may be useful in assessing dynamics and level of glucose regulation disturbances and their appropriate treatment.
稳态模型评估在葡萄糖调节机制评价中的意义和作用
介绍。数学公式,如稳态模型评估指标,被证明是有用的估计胰岛素抵抗。然而,许多已发表的结果表明,它们的参考值存在相当大的可变性。本研究旨在利用稳态模型评价指标评价非糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗水平。材料和方法。研究纳入486例个体(平均年龄36.84±12.86;17%的男性和83%的女性)。在口服葡萄糖耐量试验第0分钟和第120分钟采血,测定血糖和胰岛素的血浆水平。采用稳态模型评估2计算器、稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗、稳态模型评估胰岛素敏感性、稳态模型评估β细胞功能计算指标。使用数据分析程序对结果进行统计分析。结果。在检查人群中,口服糖耐量试验的平均血糖值在正常血糖范围内(葡萄糖0 = 4.76±0.45 mmol/L;葡萄糖120 = 5.24±1.17 mmol/L),计算的稳态模型评价指标平均值为:胰岛素抵抗1.41±0.82;β-细胞功能131.54±49.41%,胰岛素敏感性91.94±47.32%。根据研究截断值,稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗小于2。我们发现84例(17.28%)个体胰岛素抵抗增加。此外,我们将胰岛素敏感性稳态模型评估的最低参考值设定为低于50%。基础胰岛素水平在11.9 mIU/L以下的概率为66.67% (x±1SD),可认为与胰岛素抵抗的生理水平相对应。结论。在葡萄糖调节紊乱的早期阶段,对胰岛素抵抗增加和胰腺β细胞分泌改变的随访可能有助于评估葡萄糖调节紊乱的动态和水平及其适当的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信