Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Cell Diameter, Specific Membrane Capacitance and Cytoplasmic Conductivity Leveraging Microfluidic Constriction Channel
{"title":"Classification of White Blood Cells Based on Cell Diameter, Specific Membrane Capacitance and Cytoplasmic Conductivity Leveraging Microfluidic Constriction Channel","authors":"Huiwen Tan, Minruihong Wang, Yi Zhang, Xukun Huang, Deyong Chen, Min-Hsien Wu, Junbo Wang, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the classification of white blood cells based on cell diameter D<inf>c</inf>, specific membrane capacitance C<inf>sm</inf> and cytoplasmic conductivity <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex> leveraging a double T-type constriction channel based microfluidic platform. As a demonstration, D<inf>c</inf>, C<inf>sm</inf> and <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex> of granulocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=683$</tex>), monocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=203$</tex>) and lymphocytes (<tex>$\\mathrm{n}_{\\text{cell}}=856$</tex>) were quantified as <tex>$9.23\\pm 0.60$</tex> vs. <tex>$9.40\\pm 0.54$</tex> vs. <tex>$6.64\\pm 0.41\\ \\mu \\mathrm{m},\\ 1.22\\pm 0.20$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.55\\pm 0.40$</tex> vs. <tex>$1.54\\pm 0.27\\ \\mu \\mathrm{F}/\\text{cm}^{2},\\ 0.35\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.53\\pm 0.06$</tex> vs. <tex>$0.46 \\pm 0.06\\ \\mathrm{S}/\\mathrm{m}$</tex>. Successful classification rates of white blood cells were quantified as 71.6% (D<inf>c</inf>), 60.4% (C<inf>sm</inf>), 73.6% (<tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex>) and 95.2% (D<inf>c</inf> & C<inf>sm</inf> & <tex>$\\sigma_{\\text{cy}}$</tex>).","PeriodicalId":6814,"journal":{"name":"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)","volume":"11 1","pages":"1028-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper reports the classification of white blood cells based on cell diameter Dc, specific membrane capacitance Csm and cytoplasmic conductivity $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$ leveraging a double T-type constriction channel based microfluidic platform. As a demonstration, Dc, Csm and $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$ of granulocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=683$), monocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=203$) and lymphocytes ($\mathrm{n}_{\text{cell}}=856$) were quantified as $9.23\pm 0.60$ vs. $9.40\pm 0.54$ vs. $6.64\pm 0.41\ \mu \mathrm{m},\ 1.22\pm 0.20$ vs. $1.55\pm 0.40$ vs. $1.54\pm 0.27\ \mu \mathrm{F}/\text{cm}^{2},\ 0.35\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.53\pm 0.06$ vs. $0.46 \pm 0.06\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m}$. Successful classification rates of white blood cells were quantified as 71.6% (Dc), 60.4% (Csm), 73.6% ($\sigma_{\text{cy}}$) and 95.2% (Dc & Csm & $\sigma_{\text{cy}}$).