J. Frolík, P. Stránská, J. Votrubova, Barbora Emmerova, D. Vanek
{"title":"People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia)","authors":"J. Frolík, P. Stránská, J. Votrubova, Barbora Emmerova, D. Vanek","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six graves situated on the edge of the settled town suburb of Český Brod have been dated to the 2nd half of the 15th century. The group of graves situated outside the regular cemetery, and with one exception reverently buried individuals, raised the question regarding its interpretation. Anthropological study identified six men of different age with many post-traumatic changes on the bones, excessive physical strain and numerous other pathologies. DNA-based examination ruled out the possibility that they were members of minority groups (Jews, Gypsies). People buried on this site are interpreted as people in a marginal position in contemporary society. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First genetics), based mainly on the verification of a possible relationship between the buried individuals. Anthropology could give the essential knowledge about the physical condition of the buried, their illness or injuries. The selection of the samples for DNA analysis was based on visual observations of the skeletal remains. It was decided to use only intact teeth as these provide a very high success rate (Katzmarzyk 2007). 2. Description of the Site and Finds 2.1 Description of the Terrain The terrain at the site was rather simple. The subsoil consisted of weathered rock (red or rusty mudstone) at a depth of 0.9– 1.2 m below the roadway surface. The individual graves (A, B, C, F and G) and also two shallow pits (feature D with a depth of 0.17 m and feature E with 0.42 m) were deepened Figure 1. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, excavated area marked with a black circle on the Cadastral contour map. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First into the subsoil and had the same backfill (red-brown clayey silt [45%] with interlayers of grey clayey silt [45%] and a small amount of charcoal and daub). The pit features and graves were covered with a single layer – dark-grey sandyloamy soil [80%] with stones (mudstone [15%], pebbles [3%] and small brick fragments [2%]) – of a thickness of 0.2–0.5 m. This layer was covered with a pavement of quarry stones and dark-brown soil up to 0.3 m in thickness, which had survived only in the northern half of the trench pit. At some spots there was a charcoal interlayer below this pavement and above it the 0.3-metre-thick sand bedding of the current pavement. The terrain was disturbed by modern excavations (the holes from former old and recent sewerage work). The trench dug for the cables that had partially disturbed graves A and B, and also feature E, was situated approximately in the centre of the uncovered area. 2.2 Stratigraphy The stratigraphic situation of the found features and graves is extremely simple. The subsoil consists of rock, into which the individual features were deepened. This situation proves the clearing of the terrain, consisting of the original soil’s removal. The features are up to three times superimposed. For example, settlement feature D has been disturbed by grave G, which was subsequently covered or disturbed by graves A and F. At the same time, grave A has disturbed grave B (the skull from this grave was moved into the backfill of grave A). We encountered a double superposition in the case of graves C2 and C1. Settlement feature E holds a solitary stratigraphic position; we consider that its distance to the closest grave G precludes a possible mutual contact (the surface between them was disturbed by sewerage work). Interestingly, the graves show a double superposition, which proves that the area was not just used once for burial, but used repeatedly – at least for a short time. The graves and the other features were superimposed by a single settlement layer, which itself was covered by the modern road pavement. The pavement covered the section containing graves A, B, F and G. Above the pavement, finally, the whole surface was superimposed by today’s roadway and its bedding. According to their orientation, the graves can be divided into two groups: graves B, C1, C2 and G (thus all the stratigraphically-older graves + grave C1) are oriented northwest-southeast. However, the younger graves, A and F, are aligned southwest-northeast, which may reflect two different burial periods. The graves can be dated on the grounds of the finds in the backfill of their grave pits, mainly from the ceramic fragments. The youngest elements belong to the 15th century (vessel fragments with glaze on their inside and roller-stamp decoration); most of the graves show a mixture of fragments from the 12th to 15th centuries. Pottery from older features Figure 2. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, in front of house No. 407; excavated area with graves highlighted: light grey – the younger graves A and F; dark grey – the other graves; drawn by P. Pinc, digitized by D. Dvořáček. 0 1 m IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First that were disturbed by the digging of the original grave pits had come into the graves. Graves G (containing ceramics decorated with roller stamp and glaze on the inside) and grave B (without any ceramic fragments) are the oldest. With the only exception of grave A, the general position of the buried individual conforms to the usual habit. The person in grave A, according to the position of their hands, had been irreverently thrown into the pit. The absence of the remains of any items of clothing (buttons, belt buckles or shoes) shows that the deceased were either naked or wrapped, for example, in only a blanket. There are no traces of coffins (the occasional finds of nails do not prove their existence) and the position of the skeleton in grave A excludes the existence of a coffin. The terrain situation does not clearly show whether the grave group was complete or only formed part of a larger group; it did not continue westwards, northwards or eastwards, in the area of the excavated roadway. The burials could have continued below the house (the margin of the trench pit was formed by some digging for former sewerage work); however, we are lacking convincing evidence. It is not at all clear if the graves were in some way marked at the surface. Multiple burials in one pit (C1 and C2) and the spatial delimitation of graves A, B, G and F could be used as arguments for a marking on the surface. On the other hand, the mutual relation between the grave pairs B+G and A+F points to the opposite conclusion. Within the scope of the topography of Český Brod, the grave group is situated on a main arterial road leading to the former royal, and now regional, towns of Kouřim and Kolín; in view of the terrain configuration and the position of the Kouřimská brána (Kouřim Gate), this road must have had, more or less, the same course in the past. According to research undertaken in 2006–2007, the Kouřimské předměstí (Kouřim Suburb) spread along this way or road since at least the 13th century and the inhabited area ended nearby to the graves. So the graves were thus situated at the margin of a suburb. The common inhabitants of Český Brod were buried in the churchyard of St Gotthard (in the town centre), and, after 1560, at the Trinity Chapel south-east of the town centre (Poche et al. 1977, 210–211), which chronologically excludes the grave group in question. 2.3 Description of Individual Graves 2.3.1 Grave A Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved length: 1.75 m, max. width: 0.45 cm, depth: 0.52 m – Figure 3). The lower part of the pit was destroyed by the sewage connection work. The skeleton was stretched out, with outstretched legs, the right arm was bent at the elbow and laid across the chest and the left arm framed the head. The lower half of the lower limbs was missing (right leg from the knee downwards, left leg in the ankle). Orientation: south-west (head), north-east; backfill: red-brown loamy earth (30%) with smaller stones (mudstone 70%); finds: pottery fragments, imprints of plaster/mortar, building material, a bronze wire, a coin (bags 1205 and 1206) and human bones (bags 1209–11). The other human bones had been lifted in the course of the excavation for the sewage work (bags 1238 and 1239 – without any differentiation between graves A and F). A human skull (bag 1208 – see grave B) was found in the backfill (above the skeleton). Figure 3. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, in front of house No. 407; graves A and F, drawn by P. Pinc, digitized by D. Dvořáček. 0 1 m IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First 2.3.2 Grave B Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved length: 0.95 m, max. width: 0.7 m, depth: 0.52 m). The lowest part of the grave pit was preserved as an unclear imprint in the east wall of the trench dug for a sewage connection, so the original length of the grave pit can be estimated at 1.95 m. The lower half of the grave pit was destroyed by the sewage work (Figure 4). The skeleton was stretched out with slightly bent arms. The skull was missing (moved during the excavation of grave pit A into its backfill – see above). The lower part of the skeleton, including the pelvis, is lost; orientation: west-north-west (head), east-south-eastwards; backfill: cf. grave A; finds: only human bones (bags 1212 and 1213). Additional human bones had already been found during the excavation for the sewage connection (bag 1241). 2.3.3 Grave C1 Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved leng","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Six graves situated on the edge of the settled town suburb of Český Brod have been dated to the 2nd half of the 15th century. The group of graves situated outside the regular cemetery, and with one exception reverently buried individuals, raised the question regarding its interpretation. Anthropological study identified six men of different age with many post-traumatic changes on the bones, excessive physical strain and numerous other pathologies. DNA-based examination ruled out the possibility that they were members of minority groups (Jews, Gypsies). People buried on this site are interpreted as people in a marginal position in contemporary society. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First genetics), based mainly on the verification of a possible relationship between the buried individuals. Anthropology could give the essential knowledge about the physical condition of the buried, their illness or injuries. The selection of the samples for DNA analysis was based on visual observations of the skeletal remains. It was decided to use only intact teeth as these provide a very high success rate (Katzmarzyk 2007). 2. Description of the Site and Finds 2.1 Description of the Terrain The terrain at the site was rather simple. The subsoil consisted of weathered rock (red or rusty mudstone) at a depth of 0.9– 1.2 m below the roadway surface. The individual graves (A, B, C, F and G) and also two shallow pits (feature D with a depth of 0.17 m and feature E with 0.42 m) were deepened Figure 1. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, excavated area marked with a black circle on the Cadastral contour map. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First into the subsoil and had the same backfill (red-brown clayey silt [45%] with interlayers of grey clayey silt [45%] and a small amount of charcoal and daub). The pit features and graves were covered with a single layer – dark-grey sandyloamy soil [80%] with stones (mudstone [15%], pebbles [3%] and small brick fragments [2%]) – of a thickness of 0.2–0.5 m. This layer was covered with a pavement of quarry stones and dark-brown soil up to 0.3 m in thickness, which had survived only in the northern half of the trench pit. At some spots there was a charcoal interlayer below this pavement and above it the 0.3-metre-thick sand bedding of the current pavement. The terrain was disturbed by modern excavations (the holes from former old and recent sewerage work). The trench dug for the cables that had partially disturbed graves A and B, and also feature E, was situated approximately in the centre of the uncovered area. 2.2 Stratigraphy The stratigraphic situation of the found features and graves is extremely simple. The subsoil consists of rock, into which the individual features were deepened. This situation proves the clearing of the terrain, consisting of the original soil’s removal. The features are up to three times superimposed. For example, settlement feature D has been disturbed by grave G, which was subsequently covered or disturbed by graves A and F. At the same time, grave A has disturbed grave B (the skull from this grave was moved into the backfill of grave A). We encountered a double superposition in the case of graves C2 and C1. Settlement feature E holds a solitary stratigraphic position; we consider that its distance to the closest grave G precludes a possible mutual contact (the surface between them was disturbed by sewerage work). Interestingly, the graves show a double superposition, which proves that the area was not just used once for burial, but used repeatedly – at least for a short time. The graves and the other features were superimposed by a single settlement layer, which itself was covered by the modern road pavement. The pavement covered the section containing graves A, B, F and G. Above the pavement, finally, the whole surface was superimposed by today’s roadway and its bedding. According to their orientation, the graves can be divided into two groups: graves B, C1, C2 and G (thus all the stratigraphically-older graves + grave C1) are oriented northwest-southeast. However, the younger graves, A and F, are aligned southwest-northeast, which may reflect two different burial periods. The graves can be dated on the grounds of the finds in the backfill of their grave pits, mainly from the ceramic fragments. The youngest elements belong to the 15th century (vessel fragments with glaze on their inside and roller-stamp decoration); most of the graves show a mixture of fragments from the 12th to 15th centuries. Pottery from older features Figure 2. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, in front of house No. 407; excavated area with graves highlighted: light grey – the younger graves A and F; dark grey – the other graves; drawn by P. Pinc, digitized by D. Dvořáček. 0 1 m IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First that were disturbed by the digging of the original grave pits had come into the graves. Graves G (containing ceramics decorated with roller stamp and glaze on the inside) and grave B (without any ceramic fragments) are the oldest. With the only exception of grave A, the general position of the buried individual conforms to the usual habit. The person in grave A, according to the position of their hands, had been irreverently thrown into the pit. The absence of the remains of any items of clothing (buttons, belt buckles or shoes) shows that the deceased were either naked or wrapped, for example, in only a blanket. There are no traces of coffins (the occasional finds of nails do not prove their existence) and the position of the skeleton in grave A excludes the existence of a coffin. The terrain situation does not clearly show whether the grave group was complete or only formed part of a larger group; it did not continue westwards, northwards or eastwards, in the area of the excavated roadway. The burials could have continued below the house (the margin of the trench pit was formed by some digging for former sewerage work); however, we are lacking convincing evidence. It is not at all clear if the graves were in some way marked at the surface. Multiple burials in one pit (C1 and C2) and the spatial delimitation of graves A, B, G and F could be used as arguments for a marking on the surface. On the other hand, the mutual relation between the grave pairs B+G and A+F points to the opposite conclusion. Within the scope of the topography of Český Brod, the grave group is situated on a main arterial road leading to the former royal, and now regional, towns of Kouřim and Kolín; in view of the terrain configuration and the position of the Kouřimská brána (Kouřim Gate), this road must have had, more or less, the same course in the past. According to research undertaken in 2006–2007, the Kouřimské předměstí (Kouřim Suburb) spread along this way or road since at least the 13th century and the inhabited area ended nearby to the graves. So the graves were thus situated at the margin of a suburb. The common inhabitants of Český Brod were buried in the churchyard of St Gotthard (in the town centre), and, after 1560, at the Trinity Chapel south-east of the town centre (Poche et al. 1977, 210–211), which chronologically excludes the grave group in question. 2.3 Description of Individual Graves 2.3.1 Grave A Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved length: 1.75 m, max. width: 0.45 cm, depth: 0.52 m – Figure 3). The lower part of the pit was destroyed by the sewage connection work. The skeleton was stretched out, with outstretched legs, the right arm was bent at the elbow and laid across the chest and the left arm framed the head. The lower half of the lower limbs was missing (right leg from the knee downwards, left leg in the ankle). Orientation: south-west (head), north-east; backfill: red-brown loamy earth (30%) with smaller stones (mudstone 70%); finds: pottery fragments, imprints of plaster/mortar, building material, a bronze wire, a coin (bags 1205 and 1206) and human bones (bags 1209–11). The other human bones had been lifted in the course of the excavation for the sewage work (bags 1238 and 1239 – without any differentiation between graves A and F). A human skull (bag 1208 – see grave B) was found in the backfill (above the skeleton). Figure 3. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, in front of house No. 407; graves A and F, drawn by P. Pinc, digitized by D. Dvořáček. 0 1 m IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First 2.3.2 Grave B Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved length: 0.95 m, max. width: 0.7 m, depth: 0.52 m). The lowest part of the grave pit was preserved as an unclear imprint in the east wall of the trench dug for a sewage connection, so the original length of the grave pit can be estimated at 1.95 m. The lower half of the grave pit was destroyed by the sewage work (Figure 4). The skeleton was stretched out with slightly bent arms. The skull was missing (moved during the excavation of grave pit A into its backfill – see above). The lower part of the skeleton, including the pelvis, is lost; orientation: west-north-west (head), east-south-eastwards; backfill: cf. grave A; finds: only human bones (bags 1212 and 1213). Additional human bones had already been found during the excavation for the sewage connection (bag 1241). 2.3.3 Grave C1 Oblong grave pit with rounded corners (preserved leng
位于Český布罗德郊区定居城镇边缘的六座坟墓可以追溯到15世纪下半叶。这群坟墓位于常规墓地之外,除了一个被虔诚地埋葬的人之外,提出了对其解释的问题。人类学研究确定了六名不同年龄的男性,他们的骨头上有许多创伤后的变化,过度的身体疲劳和许多其他病理。基于dna的检查排除了他们是少数民族(犹太人、吉普赛人)成员的可能性。埋葬在这里的人被解读为在当代社会处于边缘地位的人。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线第一Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov的中世纪墓地(波西米亚中部)在线第一遗传学),主要基于对埋葬个体之间可能关系的验证。人类学可以提供关于被埋葬者的身体状况、他们的疾病或受伤的基本知识。DNA分析样本的选择是基于对骨骼残骸的视觉观察。决定只使用完整的牙齿,因为它们提供了非常高的成功率(卡兹马兹克2007)。2. 现场描述及发现2.1地形描述现场地形相当简单。底土由风化岩石(红色或生锈的泥岩)组成,深度为巷道表面以下0.9 - 1.2米。单个坟墓(A、B、C、F和G)和两个浅坑(特征D深度为0.17 m,特征E深度为0.42 m)加深(图1)。Český布罗德-普罗科帕veliksamho街,在地籍等高线地图上用黑色圆圈标出的挖掘区域。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线首先Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov(中部波西米亚)的中世纪墓地首先进入底土并具有相同的回填(红棕色粘土淤泥[45%]与灰色粘土淤泥[45%]中间层和少量木炭和涂抹)。坑特征和坟墓被单层覆盖——深灰色砂质土[80%]和石头(泥岩[15%],鹅卵石[3%]和小砖碎片[2%]),厚度为0.2-0.5米。这一层覆盖着一层采石场的石头和深褐色的土壤,厚度达0.3米,这些土壤只在壕沟的北半部幸存下来。在某些地方,路面下面有一层木炭夹层,上面是目前路面的0.3米厚的砂层。地形被现代挖掘(以前旧的和最近的污水处理工作造成的洞)扰乱了。为电缆挖掘的沟渠部分扰乱了坟墓A和B,以及特征E,大约位于未覆盖区域的中心。发现的地物和坟墓的地层情况极为简单。底土由岩石组成,其中加深了个别特征。这种情况证明了地形的清理,包括原始土壤的清除。这些特征被叠加了三次。例如,沉降特征D被坟墓G干扰,随后被坟墓A和f覆盖或干扰,同时,坟墓A也干扰了坟墓B(坟墓A的头骨被移到坟墓A的回填中)。在坟墓C2和C1的情况下,我们遇到了双重叠加。沉降特征E具有孤立的地层位置;我们认为它与最近的坟墓G的距离排除了相互接触的可能(它们之间的表面受到污水工程的干扰)。有趣的是,这些坟墓显示出双重叠加,这证明该地区不仅被用来埋葬一次,而且被反复使用——至少在很短的一段时间内。坟墓和其他特征叠加在一个单一的沉降层上,该沉降层本身被现代道路路面覆盖。路面覆盖了A、B、F和g墓地的部分。最后,在路面之上,整个地面都被今天的道路和它的垫层所覆盖。根据墓葬的方位,可分为B、C1、C2、G两组墓葬(即所有地层古墓葬+ C1墓葬),均为西北—东南走向。然而,较年轻的坟墓A和F是西南-东北方向的,这可能反映了两个不同的埋葬时期。这些坟墓的年代可以根据他们的坟墓坑的回填中发现的东西来确定,主要来自陶瓷碎片。最年轻的元素属于15世纪(内部有釉的容器碎片和滚轴印章装饰);大多数坟墓都混杂着12至15世纪的碎片。图2。Český Brod - Prokopa veliksamho街,门前的房子。 407;墓葬突出的发掘区域:浅灰色——较年轻的墓葬A和F;深灰色——其他的坟墓;P. Pinc绘制,D. Dvořáček数字化。1 m IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线第一Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov的中世纪墓地(波西米亚中部)在线第一被原始墓穴挖掘所打扰的人已经进入坟墓。其中,最古老的坟墓是G墓(内部装饰有滚轴印章和釉面的陶瓷)和B墓(没有任何陶瓷碎片)。除了A墓外,被埋葬的人的一般位置符合通常的习惯。坟墓A里的人,从他们双手的位置来看,是被不敬地扔进坑里的。没有任何衣物(纽扣、皮带扣或鞋子)的残骸表明,死者要么赤身裸体,要么只裹着一条毯子。没有棺材的痕迹(偶尔发现的钉子不能证明它们的存在),骷髅在坟墓A中的位置排除了棺材的存在。地形情况并不能清楚地表明坟墓群是完整的还是只是一个更大群体的一部分;它没有继续向西,向北或向东,在挖掘巷道的区域。墓葬可能在房子下面继续进行(壕沟坑的边缘是由于以前的排污工程而形成的);然而,我们缺乏令人信服的证据。目前还不清楚这些坟墓是否以某种方式在地表上做了标记。一个坑中有多个墓葬(C1和C2),坟墓A、B、G和F的空间划分可以作为地表标记的参数。另一方面,坟墓对B+G和A+F之间的相互关系指向相反的结论。在Český Brod的地形范围内,墓地群位于通往前皇家城镇Kouřim和Kolín的主干道上,现在是区域城镇;鉴于地形配置和Kouřimská brána (Kouřim门)的位置,这条路在过去一定或多或少有相同的路线。根据2006-2007年进行的研究,至少从13世纪开始,Kouřimské předměstí (Kouřim郊区)沿着这条路或道路蔓延,居民区在坟墓附近结束。所以这些坟墓就这样坐落在郊区的边缘。Český Brod的普通居民被埋葬在圣哥达的教堂墓地(在镇中心),1560年后,在镇中心东南的三一教堂(Poche et al. 1977, 210-211),按时间顺序排除了有问题的坟墓群。2.3个别墓葬的描述2.3.1墓葬A一个圆角长方形墓坑(保存长度:1.75 m,最大。宽度:0.45 cm,深度:0.52 m -图3)。坑的下部被污水连接工程破坏。骨架伸展着,两条腿伸展着,右臂在肘部弯曲,横放在胸前,左臂支撑着头部。下肢下半部分缺失(右腿膝盖以下,左腿脚踝)。方位:西南(头部)、东北;回填土:红棕色壤土(30%),较小石块(泥岩70%);发现:陶器碎片、石膏/灰浆的印记、建筑材料、铜丝、硬币(袋子1205和1206)和人骨(袋子1209-11)。其他的人骨是在污水处理工作的挖掘过程中被挖掘出来的(1238号和1239号袋子——没有区分坟墓A和坟墓F)。在回填中发现了一个人头骨(1208号袋子——见坟墓B)(在骨骼的上方)。图3。Český Brod - Prokopa veliksamho街,407号房子前;坟墓A和坟墓F, P. Pinc绘制,D. Dvořáček数字化。01 m IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线第一Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov(中部波西米亚)的中世纪墓地在线第一2.3.2坟墓B圆角椭圆形坟墓坑(保存长度:0.95米,最大。宽0.7 m,深0.52 m),坑的最低部分在污水渠东壁留下了不清楚的印记,因此估计坑的原始长度为1.95 m。墓坑的下半部分被排污工程破坏了(图4)。骨架伸展着,手臂微微弯曲。头骨不见了(在A坑的挖掘过程中被移到了回填中——见上文)。骨骼的下半部分,包括骨盆,都不见了;方位:西北偏西(头部),东南偏东;回填:参照A级坟场;发现:只有人骨(袋子1212和1213)。在挖掘下水道连接处的过程中,已经发现了更多的人骨(袋子1241)。2.3. C1圆形墓坑,有圆角(保留棱)