Lung Ultrasound using a Handheld Device to Diagnose COVID-19 in the Emergency Department

Abdulrahman M. Alfuraih, Abdussalam Alshehri, Hani M. Alshehri, Sami A. Alamri, Tariq S. Aleyyed, Khalid Alaufi, Mohammed J. Alsaadi
{"title":"Lung Ultrasound using a Handheld Device to Diagnose COVID-19 in the Emergency Department","authors":"Abdulrahman M. Alfuraih, Abdussalam Alshehri, Hani M. Alshehri, Sami A. Alamri, Tariq S. Aleyyed, Khalid Alaufi, Mohammed J. Alsaadi","doi":"10.2991/dsahmj.k.210823.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has critically struck healthcare systems and burdened emergency services. To date, there is no accurate and rapid point-of-care diagnostic test. This study aimed to investigate Lung Ultrasound (LUS) against Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test in suspected COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department. In 20 eligible patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 49 ± 15 years), 12 had a positive RT-PCR test and undergone an LUS examination over 12 lung zones using a handheld ultrasound device. Each zone was semiquantitatively scored according to the Lung Ultrasound Scoring System (LUSS) from 0 to 3 based on the severity of findings (pleural line irregularity, B-lines, consolidations) and documented the presence of light beam artifacts. A second blinded reader scored the images to investigate interreader reproducibility. The LUSS score had a modest diagnostic performance at 66.6% [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 34.9–90.0%] sensitivity and 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8%) specificity. The light beam artifact was more prevalent and sensitive to COVID-19 patients with 81.8% (95% CI, 48.2–97.7%) sensitivity and 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8%) specificity. LUS had an almost perfect interreader reproducibility for LUSS (Kendall’s W = 0.961; 95% CI, 0.894–0.985) and light beam artifact (Cohen’s κ = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.683–1.00). Overall, LUS using handheld devices can offer a safe, reproducible, rapid, and feasible first-line tool for detecting COVID-19 patients in emergency departments. The light beam artifact was more sensitive and specific to COVID-19 patients and can be useful for effectively triaging suspected cases.","PeriodicalId":52781,"journal":{"name":"Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/dsahmj.k.210823.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has critically struck healthcare systems and burdened emergency services. To date, there is no accurate and rapid point-of-care diagnostic test. This study aimed to investigate Lung Ultrasound (LUS) against Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test in suspected COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department. In 20 eligible patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 49 ± 15 years), 12 had a positive RT-PCR test and undergone an LUS examination over 12 lung zones using a handheld ultrasound device. Each zone was semiquantitatively scored according to the Lung Ultrasound Scoring System (LUSS) from 0 to 3 based on the severity of findings (pleural line irregularity, B-lines, consolidations) and documented the presence of light beam artifacts. A second blinded reader scored the images to investigate interreader reproducibility. The LUSS score had a modest diagnostic performance at 66.6% [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 34.9–90.0%] sensitivity and 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8%) specificity. The light beam artifact was more prevalent and sensitive to COVID-19 patients with 81.8% (95% CI, 48.2–97.7%) sensitivity and 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8%) specificity. LUS had an almost perfect interreader reproducibility for LUSS (Kendall’s W = 0.961; 95% CI, 0.894–0.985) and light beam artifact (Cohen’s κ = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.683–1.00). Overall, LUS using handheld devices can offer a safe, reproducible, rapid, and feasible first-line tool for detecting COVID-19 patients in emergency departments. The light beam artifact was more sensitive and specific to COVID-19 patients and can be useful for effectively triaging suspected cases.
在急诊科使用手持设备进行肺部超声诊断COVID-19
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重打击了卫生保健系统,给应急服务带来了负担。迄今为止,没有准确和快速的即时诊断测试。本研究旨在探讨肺部超声(LUS)对急诊疑似COVID-19患者逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的影响。在20例符合条件的患者(平均年龄±标准差,49±15岁)中,12例RT-PCR检测阳性,并使用手持式超声设备对12个肺区进行LUS检查。根据肺超声评分系统(LUSS)根据发现的严重程度(胸膜线不规则、b线、实变)对每个区域进行半定量评分,评分范围从0到3,并记录光束伪影的存在。第二个盲读器对图像进行评分,以调查解读器的再现性。LUSS评分具有中等诊断性能,敏感性为66.6%[95%置信区间(CI), 34.9-90.0%],特异性为75.0% (95% CI, 34.9-96.8%)。光束伪影在COVID-19患者中更为普遍和敏感,敏感性为81.8% (95% CI, 48.2-97.7%),特异性为75.0% (95% CI, 34.9-96.8%)。LUS对LUSS具有几乎完美的解释器重现性(Kendall’s W = 0.961;95% CI, 0.894-0.985)和光束伪影(Cohen’s κ = 0.890;95% ci, 0.683-1.00)。总之,使用手持设备的LUS可以为急诊科检测COVID-19患者提供安全、可重复、快速和可行的一线工具。光束伪像对COVID-19患者更敏感和特异性,可用于有效分诊疑似病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
49 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信