Social Media and the Hermeneutics of Participation in the Digital Culture

Oscar Diamante
{"title":"Social Media and the Hermeneutics of Participation in the Digital Culture","authors":"Oscar Diamante","doi":"10.31944/2019922.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pervasive social media and the mobile technologies today, with their features of connectivity, interactivity, participatory, and user-productivity, have provided us new ways of relating with one another and with the world. The participatory culture that social media have helped form stirs up new forms of political participation, economic production, and sociality. However, this also brings about fresh anxieties, tension, and conflict of interests. Critics doubt the optimism and ask whether the goods that social media brings in fact just screen the real negative effects upon our individual character and the social order; thus, their call for a critical theory of the digital culture. In that light, this paper studies the structure of participation in and with social media as part of the hermeneutic phenomenon. Concerned with the status of human understanding, philosophical hermeneutics presents a concept of participation that is integral in the notion of understanding as conversation. The paper also highlights the contrasts between the manipulative tendency of the technical reason and the involved and deliberative character of human practice (praxis). Philosophical hermeneutics, then, as practical philosophy, combats the notion of understanding and participation that is dominated by instrumental and techOscar R. Diamante University of Santo Tomas","PeriodicalId":83395,"journal":{"name":"Unitas (Helsinki, Finland : English edition)","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unitas (Helsinki, Finland : English edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31944/2019922.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pervasive social media and the mobile technologies today, with their features of connectivity, interactivity, participatory, and user-productivity, have provided us new ways of relating with one another and with the world. The participatory culture that social media have helped form stirs up new forms of political participation, economic production, and sociality. However, this also brings about fresh anxieties, tension, and conflict of interests. Critics doubt the optimism and ask whether the goods that social media brings in fact just screen the real negative effects upon our individual character and the social order; thus, their call for a critical theory of the digital culture. In that light, this paper studies the structure of participation in and with social media as part of the hermeneutic phenomenon. Concerned with the status of human understanding, philosophical hermeneutics presents a concept of participation that is integral in the notion of understanding as conversation. The paper also highlights the contrasts between the manipulative tendency of the technical reason and the involved and deliberative character of human practice (praxis). Philosophical hermeneutics, then, as practical philosophy, combats the notion of understanding and participation that is dominated by instrumental and techOscar R. Diamante University of Santo Tomas
社交媒体与参与数字文化的解释学
当今无处不在的社交媒体和移动技术,以其连接性、互动性、参与性和用户生产力的特点,为我们提供了与他人以及与世界联系的新方式。社交媒体帮助形成的参与性文化激发了政治参与、经济生产和社会性的新形式。然而,这也带来了新的焦虑、紧张和利益冲突。批评者质疑这种乐观主义,并质疑社交媒体带来的好处实际上只是掩盖了对我们个人性格和社会秩序的真正负面影响;因此,他们呼吁对数字文化进行批判理论。鉴于此,本文将参与社交媒体的结构作为解释学现象的一部分来研究。关注人类理解的状态,哲学解释学提出了一个参与的概念,这个概念是作为对话的理解概念中不可或缺的一部分。文章还强调了技术理性的操纵倾向与人类实践的涉入性和协商性之间的对比。哲学解释学,作为实践哲学,反对由工具和技术主导的理解和参与的概念(圣托马斯大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书